Analytical comparison of the acoustic analogy and Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Lighthill acoustic analogy, as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation, is compared with the Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces. A comparison of the two governing equations reveals that the main Kirchhoff advantage (namely nonlinear flow effects are included in the surface integration) is also available to the FW-H method if the integration surface used in the FW-H equation is not assumed impenetrable. The FW-H equation is analytically superior for aeroacoustics because it is based upon the conservation laws of fluid mechanics rather than the wave equation. This means that the FW-H equation is valid even if the integration surface is in the nonlinear region. This is demonstrated numerically in the paper. The Kirchhoff approach can lead to substantial errors if the integration surface is not positioned in the linear region. These errors may be hard to identify. Finally, new metrics based on the Sobolev norm are introduced which may be used to compare input data for both quadrupole noise calculations and Kirchhoff noise predictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-696
Number of pages10
JournalAnnual Forum Proceedings - American Helicopter Society
Volume1
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

acoustics
Acoustics
Aeroacoustics
mechanic
Fluid mechanics
Wave equations
conservation
Conservation
Law

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

@article{c6949679e44d408e95d3074d28461f19,
title = "Analytical comparison of the acoustic analogy and Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces",
abstract = "The Lighthill acoustic analogy, as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation, is compared with the Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces. A comparison of the two governing equations reveals that the main Kirchhoff advantage (namely nonlinear flow effects are included in the surface integration) is also available to the FW-H method if the integration surface used in the FW-H equation is not assumed impenetrable. The FW-H equation is analytically superior for aeroacoustics because it is based upon the conservation laws of fluid mechanics rather than the wave equation. This means that the FW-H equation is valid even if the integration surface is in the nonlinear region. This is demonstrated numerically in the paper. The Kirchhoff approach can lead to substantial errors if the integration surface is not positioned in the linear region. These errors may be hard to identify. Finally, new metrics based on the Sobolev norm are introduced which may be used to compare input data for both quadrupole noise calculations and Kirchhoff noise predictions.",
author = "Brentner, {Kenneth Steven} and F. Farassat",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "687--696",
journal = "Annual Forum Proceedings - American Helicopter Society",
issn = "0733-4249",
publisher = "American Helicopter Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytical comparison of the acoustic analogy and Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces

AU - Brentner, Kenneth Steven

AU - Farassat, F.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The Lighthill acoustic analogy, as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation, is compared with the Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces. A comparison of the two governing equations reveals that the main Kirchhoff advantage (namely nonlinear flow effects are included in the surface integration) is also available to the FW-H method if the integration surface used in the FW-H equation is not assumed impenetrable. The FW-H equation is analytically superior for aeroacoustics because it is based upon the conservation laws of fluid mechanics rather than the wave equation. This means that the FW-H equation is valid even if the integration surface is in the nonlinear region. This is demonstrated numerically in the paper. The Kirchhoff approach can lead to substantial errors if the integration surface is not positioned in the linear region. These errors may be hard to identify. Finally, new metrics based on the Sobolev norm are introduced which may be used to compare input data for both quadrupole noise calculations and Kirchhoff noise predictions.

AB - The Lighthill acoustic analogy, as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation, is compared with the Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces. A comparison of the two governing equations reveals that the main Kirchhoff advantage (namely nonlinear flow effects are included in the surface integration) is also available to the FW-H method if the integration surface used in the FW-H equation is not assumed impenetrable. The FW-H equation is analytically superior for aeroacoustics because it is based upon the conservation laws of fluid mechanics rather than the wave equation. This means that the FW-H equation is valid even if the integration surface is in the nonlinear region. This is demonstrated numerically in the paper. The Kirchhoff approach can lead to substantial errors if the integration surface is not positioned in the linear region. These errors may be hard to identify. Finally, new metrics based on the Sobolev norm are introduced which may be used to compare input data for both quadrupole noise calculations and Kirchhoff noise predictions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030681975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030681975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030681975

VL - 1

SP - 687

EP - 696

JO - Annual Forum Proceedings - American Helicopter Society

JF - Annual Forum Proceedings - American Helicopter Society

SN - 0733-4249

ER -