Angels and Demons Are Among Us: Assessing Individual Differences in Belief in Pure Evil and Belief in Pure Good

Russell J. Webster, Donald A. Saucier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted five studies to demonstrate that individuals' beliefs in pure evil (BPE) and in pure good (BPG) are valid and important psychological constructs. First, these studies together demonstrated that BPE and BPG are reliable, unitary, and stable constructs each composed of eight theoretically interdependent dimensions. Second, these studies showed that across a wide variety of different measures, higher BPE consistently related to greater intergroup aggression (e.g., supporting the death penalty and preemptive military aggression) and less intergroup prosociality (e.g., opposing criminal rehabilitation, proracial policies, and beneficial social programs), while higher BPG consistently related to less intergroup aggression (e.g., opposing proviolent foreign relations and torture) and greater intergroup prosociality (e.g., supporting criminal rehabilitation and support for diplomacy). In sum, these studies evidence that BPE and BPG relate to aggressive and prosocial orientations toward others and have strong potential to advance current theories on prejudice, aggression, and prosociality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1455-1470
Number of pages16
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume39
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013

Fingerprint

Aggression
Individuality
Rehabilitation
Capital Punishment
Torture
Public Policy
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{ee4d22f61b424bc29ff183196a3ef655,
title = "Angels and Demons Are Among Us: Assessing Individual Differences in Belief in Pure Evil and Belief in Pure Good",
abstract = "We conducted five studies to demonstrate that individuals' beliefs in pure evil (BPE) and in pure good (BPG) are valid and important psychological constructs. First, these studies together demonstrated that BPE and BPG are reliable, unitary, and stable constructs each composed of eight theoretically interdependent dimensions. Second, these studies showed that across a wide variety of different measures, higher BPE consistently related to greater intergroup aggression (e.g., supporting the death penalty and preemptive military aggression) and less intergroup prosociality (e.g., opposing criminal rehabilitation, proracial policies, and beneficial social programs), while higher BPG consistently related to less intergroup aggression (e.g., opposing proviolent foreign relations and torture) and greater intergroup prosociality (e.g., supporting criminal rehabilitation and support for diplomacy). In sum, these studies evidence that BPE and BPG relate to aggressive and prosocial orientations toward others and have strong potential to advance current theories on prejudice, aggression, and prosociality.",
author = "Webster, {Russell J.} and Saucier, {Donald A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167213496282",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1455--1470",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "11",

}

Angels and Demons Are Among Us : Assessing Individual Differences in Belief in Pure Evil and Belief in Pure Good. / Webster, Russell J.; Saucier, Donald A.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 11, 01.11.2013, p. 1455-1470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angels and Demons Are Among Us

T2 - Assessing Individual Differences in Belief in Pure Evil and Belief in Pure Good

AU - Webster, Russell J.

AU - Saucier, Donald A.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - We conducted five studies to demonstrate that individuals' beliefs in pure evil (BPE) and in pure good (BPG) are valid and important psychological constructs. First, these studies together demonstrated that BPE and BPG are reliable, unitary, and stable constructs each composed of eight theoretically interdependent dimensions. Second, these studies showed that across a wide variety of different measures, higher BPE consistently related to greater intergroup aggression (e.g., supporting the death penalty and preemptive military aggression) and less intergroup prosociality (e.g., opposing criminal rehabilitation, proracial policies, and beneficial social programs), while higher BPG consistently related to less intergroup aggression (e.g., opposing proviolent foreign relations and torture) and greater intergroup prosociality (e.g., supporting criminal rehabilitation and support for diplomacy). In sum, these studies evidence that BPE and BPG relate to aggressive and prosocial orientations toward others and have strong potential to advance current theories on prejudice, aggression, and prosociality.

AB - We conducted five studies to demonstrate that individuals' beliefs in pure evil (BPE) and in pure good (BPG) are valid and important psychological constructs. First, these studies together demonstrated that BPE and BPG are reliable, unitary, and stable constructs each composed of eight theoretically interdependent dimensions. Second, these studies showed that across a wide variety of different measures, higher BPE consistently related to greater intergroup aggression (e.g., supporting the death penalty and preemptive military aggression) and less intergroup prosociality (e.g., opposing criminal rehabilitation, proracial policies, and beneficial social programs), while higher BPG consistently related to less intergroup aggression (e.g., opposing proviolent foreign relations and torture) and greater intergroup prosociality (e.g., supporting criminal rehabilitation and support for diplomacy). In sum, these studies evidence that BPE and BPG relate to aggressive and prosocial orientations toward others and have strong potential to advance current theories on prejudice, aggression, and prosociality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885572368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885572368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167213496282

DO - 10.1177/0146167213496282

M3 - Article

C2 - 23885037

AN - SCOPUS:84885572368

VL - 39

SP - 1455

EP - 1470

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 11

ER -