Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reverses luteal phase steroid production in oocyte donors

R. S. Morris, R. J. Paulson, S. R. Lindhelm, R. S. Legro, R. A. Lobo, M. V. Sauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition would affect ovarian steroid synthesis in the oocyte donors undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulalion (COH). Setting: The IVF program of the University of Southern California. Design: Prospective matched clinical trial. Patients: Twelve oocyte donors were studied in 28 hyperstimulation cycles. Interventions: Donors underwent a standard COH protocol. Follicle aspiration was performed 34 hours after administration of hCG. After the procedure, seven donors were administered the ACE inhibitor, captopril, 6.25 mg orally twice daily for 4 days. The remaining patients served as Main Outcome Measures: Serum E2, P, plasma prorenin, active renin, and angiotensin II (Ang II). Results: Angiotensin II increased after aspiration in both groups hut was significantly lower in those receiving captopril. Peak P in the captopril group was significantly lower than controls (81.8 ± 27.8 versus 208.5 ± 23.9 ng/mL [conversion factor to SI unit, 3.180]). Peak E2 was significantly higher (2,222.4 ± 875.3 versus 425.6 ± 490.4 pg/mL [conversion factor to SI unit, 3.671]). Active renin and Ang II correlated with P. Conclusions: In stimulated cycles, inhibition of Ang II production appears to raise serum E2 and lower P levels. Angiotensin II, therefore, may have a role in the regulation of ovarian steroid synthesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)854-858
Number of pages5
JournalFertility and sterility
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reverses luteal phase steroid production in oocyte donors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this