Annual Presidential Address Is EUGene a Collective Bad?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The EUGene software program has become widely used in quantitative international relations. Originally planned to develop expected utility data, over time it has become a general-purpose tool for constructing data sets for use in the study of international conflict, particularly data sets with the dyad-year as the unit of analysis. However, the way in which EUGene has made data set construction easier has also led to some criticism of the program. In this article, I address some of these criticisms and argue that EUGene is still a valuable tool. I also present data suggesting that the use of statistical methods in quantitative studies of international relations has changed, with the use of more, and more sophisticated, methods in published articles over time. The use of more sophisticated methods make tools such as EUGene particularly valuable, as they make it quicker to perform routine data preparation tasks, leaving more time for analysis and data interpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-330
Number of pages16
JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

international relations
criticism
data preparation
international conflict
statistical method
dyad
interpretation
Criticism
International relations
time
International conflict
Unit of analysis
Dyads
Statistical methods
Preparation
Software
Expected utility
software

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{25817a5da4fc44e88e3c2cabc3eaafb7,
title = "Annual Presidential Address Is EUGene a Collective Bad?",
abstract = "The EUGene software program has become widely used in quantitative international relations. Originally planned to develop expected utility data, over time it has become a general-purpose tool for constructing data sets for use in the study of international conflict, particularly data sets with the dyad-year as the unit of analysis. However, the way in which EUGene has made data set construction easier has also led to some criticism of the program. In this article, I address some of these criticisms and argue that EUGene is still a valuable tool. I also present data suggesting that the use of statistical methods in quantitative studies of international relations has changed, with the use of more, and more sophisticated, methods in published articles over time. The use of more sophisticated methods make tools such as EUGene particularly valuable, as they make it quicker to perform routine data preparation tasks, leaving more time for analysis and data interpretation.",
author = "{Bennett, Jr.}, {David Scott}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0738894211413055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "315--330",
journal = "Conflict Management and Peace Science",
issn = "0738-8942",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Annual Presidential Address Is EUGene a Collective Bad? / Bennett, Jr., David Scott.

In: Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.09.2011, p. 315-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Annual Presidential Address Is EUGene a Collective Bad?

AU - Bennett, Jr., David Scott

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - The EUGene software program has become widely used in quantitative international relations. Originally planned to develop expected utility data, over time it has become a general-purpose tool for constructing data sets for use in the study of international conflict, particularly data sets with the dyad-year as the unit of analysis. However, the way in which EUGene has made data set construction easier has also led to some criticism of the program. In this article, I address some of these criticisms and argue that EUGene is still a valuable tool. I also present data suggesting that the use of statistical methods in quantitative studies of international relations has changed, with the use of more, and more sophisticated, methods in published articles over time. The use of more sophisticated methods make tools such as EUGene particularly valuable, as they make it quicker to perform routine data preparation tasks, leaving more time for analysis and data interpretation.

AB - The EUGene software program has become widely used in quantitative international relations. Originally planned to develop expected utility data, over time it has become a general-purpose tool for constructing data sets for use in the study of international conflict, particularly data sets with the dyad-year as the unit of analysis. However, the way in which EUGene has made data set construction easier has also led to some criticism of the program. In this article, I address some of these criticisms and argue that EUGene is still a valuable tool. I also present data suggesting that the use of statistical methods in quantitative studies of international relations has changed, with the use of more, and more sophisticated, methods in published articles over time. The use of more sophisticated methods make tools such as EUGene particularly valuable, as they make it quicker to perform routine data preparation tasks, leaving more time for analysis and data interpretation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053596390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053596390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0738894211413055

DO - 10.1177/0738894211413055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80053596390

VL - 28

SP - 315

EP - 330

JO - Conflict Management and Peace Science

JF - Conflict Management and Peace Science

SN - 0738-8942

IS - 4

ER -