Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model

Alison Breland, Robert L. Balster, Caroline Cobb, Pebbles Fagan, Jonathan Foulds, J. Randy Koch, Thokozeni Lipato, Najat Saliba, Alan Shihadeh, Shumei Sun, Thomas Eissenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are a relatively new class of tobacco products and a subject of much debate for scientists and policymakers worldwide. Objective data that address the ECIG risk- benefit ratio for individual and public health are needed, and addressing this need requires a multidisciplinary approach that spans several areas of psychology as well as chemistry, toxicant inhalation, and physiology. This multidisciplinary approach would benefit from methods that are reliable, valid, and swift. For this reason, we formed a multidisciplinary team to develop methods that could answer questions about ECIGs and other potential modified risk tobacco products. Our team includes scientists with expertise in psychology (clinical, community, and experimental) and other disciplines, including aerosol research, analytical chemistry, biostatistics, engineering, internal medicine, and public health. The psychologists on our team keep other members focused on factors that influence individual behavior, and other team members keep the psychologists aware of other issues, such as product design. Critically, all team members are willing to extend their interests beyond the boundaries of their discipline to collaborate effectively with the shared goal of producing therigorous science needed to inform empirically based tobacco policy. In addition, our trainees gain valuable knowledge from these collaborations and learn that other disciplines are accessible, exciting, and can enhance their own research. Multidisciplinary work presents challenges: learning other scientists' languages and staying focused on our core mission. Overall, our multidisciplinary team has led to several major findings that inform the scientific, regulatory, and public health communities about ECIGs and their effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-379
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Public Health
Psychology
Tobacco Products
Biostatistics
Experimental Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Internal Medicine
Aerosols
Research
Inhalation
Tobacco
Language
Odds Ratio
Learning
Electronic Cigarettes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Breland, A., Balster, R. L., Cobb, C., Fagan, P., Foulds, J., Koch, J. R., ... Eissenberg, T. (2019). Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model. American Psychologist, 74(3), 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000426
Breland, Alison ; Balster, Robert L. ; Cobb, Caroline ; Fagan, Pebbles ; Foulds, Jonathan ; Koch, J. Randy ; Lipato, Thokozeni ; Saliba, Najat ; Shihadeh, Alan ; Sun, Shumei ; Eissenberg, Thomas. / Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model. In: American Psychologist. 2019 ; Vol. 74, No. 3. pp. 368-379.
@article{0601a876ec134f788d781acf8d59589f,
title = "Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model",
abstract = "Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are a relatively new class of tobacco products and a subject of much debate for scientists and policymakers worldwide. Objective data that address the ECIG risk- benefit ratio for individual and public health are needed, and addressing this need requires a multidisciplinary approach that spans several areas of psychology as well as chemistry, toxicant inhalation, and physiology. This multidisciplinary approach would benefit from methods that are reliable, valid, and swift. For this reason, we formed a multidisciplinary team to develop methods that could answer questions about ECIGs and other potential modified risk tobacco products. Our team includes scientists with expertise in psychology (clinical, community, and experimental) and other disciplines, including aerosol research, analytical chemistry, biostatistics, engineering, internal medicine, and public health. The psychologists on our team keep other members focused on factors that influence individual behavior, and other team members keep the psychologists aware of other issues, such as product design. Critically, all team members are willing to extend their interests beyond the boundaries of their discipline to collaborate effectively with the shared goal of producing therigorous science needed to inform empirically based tobacco policy. In addition, our trainees gain valuable knowledge from these collaborations and learn that other disciplines are accessible, exciting, and can enhance their own research. Multidisciplinary work presents challenges: learning other scientists' languages and staying focused on our core mission. Overall, our multidisciplinary team has led to several major findings that inform the scientific, regulatory, and public health communities about ECIGs and their effects.",
author = "Alison Breland and Balster, {Robert L.} and Caroline Cobb and Pebbles Fagan and Jonathan Foulds and Koch, {J. Randy} and Thokozeni Lipato and Najat Saliba and Alan Shihadeh and Shumei Sun and Thomas Eissenberg",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/amp0000426",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "368--379",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Breland, A, Balster, RL, Cobb, C, Fagan, P, Foulds, J, Koch, JR, Lipato, T, Saliba, N, Shihadeh, A, Sun, S & Eissenberg, T 2019, 'Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model', American Psychologist, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000426

Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model. / Breland, Alison; Balster, Robert L.; Cobb, Caroline; Fagan, Pebbles; Foulds, Jonathan; Koch, J. Randy; Lipato, Thokozeni; Saliba, Najat; Shihadeh, Alan; Sun, Shumei; Eissenberg, Thomas.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 74, No. 3, 01.04.2019, p. 368-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model

AU - Breland, Alison

AU - Balster, Robert L.

AU - Cobb, Caroline

AU - Fagan, Pebbles

AU - Foulds, Jonathan

AU - Koch, J. Randy

AU - Lipato, Thokozeni

AU - Saliba, Najat

AU - Shihadeh, Alan

AU - Sun, Shumei

AU - Eissenberg, Thomas

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are a relatively new class of tobacco products and a subject of much debate for scientists and policymakers worldwide. Objective data that address the ECIG risk- benefit ratio for individual and public health are needed, and addressing this need requires a multidisciplinary approach that spans several areas of psychology as well as chemistry, toxicant inhalation, and physiology. This multidisciplinary approach would benefit from methods that are reliable, valid, and swift. For this reason, we formed a multidisciplinary team to develop methods that could answer questions about ECIGs and other potential modified risk tobacco products. Our team includes scientists with expertise in psychology (clinical, community, and experimental) and other disciplines, including aerosol research, analytical chemistry, biostatistics, engineering, internal medicine, and public health. The psychologists on our team keep other members focused on factors that influence individual behavior, and other team members keep the psychologists aware of other issues, such as product design. Critically, all team members are willing to extend their interests beyond the boundaries of their discipline to collaborate effectively with the shared goal of producing therigorous science needed to inform empirically based tobacco policy. In addition, our trainees gain valuable knowledge from these collaborations and learn that other disciplines are accessible, exciting, and can enhance their own research. Multidisciplinary work presents challenges: learning other scientists' languages and staying focused on our core mission. Overall, our multidisciplinary team has led to several major findings that inform the scientific, regulatory, and public health communities about ECIGs and their effects.

AB - Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are a relatively new class of tobacco products and a subject of much debate for scientists and policymakers worldwide. Objective data that address the ECIG risk- benefit ratio for individual and public health are needed, and addressing this need requires a multidisciplinary approach that spans several areas of psychology as well as chemistry, toxicant inhalation, and physiology. This multidisciplinary approach would benefit from methods that are reliable, valid, and swift. For this reason, we formed a multidisciplinary team to develop methods that could answer questions about ECIGs and other potential modified risk tobacco products. Our team includes scientists with expertise in psychology (clinical, community, and experimental) and other disciplines, including aerosol research, analytical chemistry, biostatistics, engineering, internal medicine, and public health. The psychologists on our team keep other members focused on factors that influence individual behavior, and other team members keep the psychologists aware of other issues, such as product design. Critically, all team members are willing to extend their interests beyond the boundaries of their discipline to collaborate effectively with the shared goal of producing therigorous science needed to inform empirically based tobacco policy. In addition, our trainees gain valuable knowledge from these collaborations and learn that other disciplines are accessible, exciting, and can enhance their own research. Multidisciplinary work presents challenges: learning other scientists' languages and staying focused on our core mission. Overall, our multidisciplinary team has led to several major findings that inform the scientific, regulatory, and public health communities about ECIGs and their effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063930252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063930252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/amp0000426

DO - 10.1037/amp0000426

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 368

EP - 379

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 3

ER -