Anticipatory contrast as a function of access time and spatial location

Charles F. Flaherty, Patricia S. Grigson, Cynthia Coppotelli, Colin Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intake of a 0.15% saccharin solution was suppressed when it was followed by a 32% sucrose solution in brief daily pairings. With equal access durations to the two solutions, intervals of intermediate duration (2 or 3 min) produced a larger contrast than more extreme intervals (1 or 10 min). There was no evidence of inhibition of delay with the 10-min interval (Experiments 1A and 1B). When access times were asymmetrical, longer access time to the flint solution reduced contrast, whereas longer access time to the second solution enhanced contrast (Experiment 2). Contrast was greater when the two solutions were presented at consistent and separate spatial locations than when location was changed randomly or when both solutions were presented in sequence at the same location. However, a degree of contrast occurred in all conditions (Experiment 3). Experiment 4, conducted with the solutions in opposite arms of a T-maze, showed that anticipatory approach to the location correlated with the 32% sucrose solution developed prior to lick suppression on the saccharin solution. However, within daily sessions, there was a reliable increase in contrast without correlated changes in anticipatory-approach behavior. Access-time effects were attributed to altered reward values, whereas spatial-separation effects suggest that goal- directed responses contribute to, but do not cause, anticipatory contrast.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-81
Number of pages14
JournalAnimal Learning and Behavior
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

saccharin
Saccharin
Sucrose
sucrose
Choice Behavior
duration
Reward
Inhibition (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Flaherty, Charles F. ; Grigson, Patricia S. ; Coppotelli, Cynthia ; Mitchell, Colin. / Anticipatory contrast as a function of access time and spatial location. In: Animal Learning and Behavior. 1996 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 68-81.
@article{39985b1dcc824382be58c08b11488a00,
title = "Anticipatory contrast as a function of access time and spatial location",
abstract = "Intake of a 0.15{\%} saccharin solution was suppressed when it was followed by a 32{\%} sucrose solution in brief daily pairings. With equal access durations to the two solutions, intervals of intermediate duration (2 or 3 min) produced a larger contrast than more extreme intervals (1 or 10 min). There was no evidence of inhibition of delay with the 10-min interval (Experiments 1A and 1B). When access times were asymmetrical, longer access time to the flint solution reduced contrast, whereas longer access time to the second solution enhanced contrast (Experiment 2). Contrast was greater when the two solutions were presented at consistent and separate spatial locations than when location was changed randomly or when both solutions were presented in sequence at the same location. However, a degree of contrast occurred in all conditions (Experiment 3). Experiment 4, conducted with the solutions in opposite arms of a T-maze, showed that anticipatory approach to the location correlated with the 32{\%} sucrose solution developed prior to lick suppression on the saccharin solution. However, within daily sessions, there was a reliable increase in contrast without correlated changes in anticipatory-approach behavior. Access-time effects were attributed to altered reward values, whereas spatial-separation effects suggest that goal- directed responses contribute to, but do not cause, anticipatory contrast.",
author = "Flaherty, {Charles F.} and Grigson, {Patricia S.} and Cynthia Coppotelli and Colin Mitchell",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03198955",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "68--81",
journal = "Animal Learning and Behavior",
issn = "0090-4996",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Anticipatory contrast as a function of access time and spatial location. / Flaherty, Charles F.; Grigson, Patricia S.; Coppotelli, Cynthia; Mitchell, Colin.

In: Animal Learning and Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 68-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anticipatory contrast as a function of access time and spatial location

AU - Flaherty, Charles F.

AU - Grigson, Patricia S.

AU - Coppotelli, Cynthia

AU - Mitchell, Colin

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Intake of a 0.15% saccharin solution was suppressed when it was followed by a 32% sucrose solution in brief daily pairings. With equal access durations to the two solutions, intervals of intermediate duration (2 or 3 min) produced a larger contrast than more extreme intervals (1 or 10 min). There was no evidence of inhibition of delay with the 10-min interval (Experiments 1A and 1B). When access times were asymmetrical, longer access time to the flint solution reduced contrast, whereas longer access time to the second solution enhanced contrast (Experiment 2). Contrast was greater when the two solutions were presented at consistent and separate spatial locations than when location was changed randomly or when both solutions were presented in sequence at the same location. However, a degree of contrast occurred in all conditions (Experiment 3). Experiment 4, conducted with the solutions in opposite arms of a T-maze, showed that anticipatory approach to the location correlated with the 32% sucrose solution developed prior to lick suppression on the saccharin solution. However, within daily sessions, there was a reliable increase in contrast without correlated changes in anticipatory-approach behavior. Access-time effects were attributed to altered reward values, whereas spatial-separation effects suggest that goal- directed responses contribute to, but do not cause, anticipatory contrast.

AB - Intake of a 0.15% saccharin solution was suppressed when it was followed by a 32% sucrose solution in brief daily pairings. With equal access durations to the two solutions, intervals of intermediate duration (2 or 3 min) produced a larger contrast than more extreme intervals (1 or 10 min). There was no evidence of inhibition of delay with the 10-min interval (Experiments 1A and 1B). When access times were asymmetrical, longer access time to the flint solution reduced contrast, whereas longer access time to the second solution enhanced contrast (Experiment 2). Contrast was greater when the two solutions were presented at consistent and separate spatial locations than when location was changed randomly or when both solutions were presented in sequence at the same location. However, a degree of contrast occurred in all conditions (Experiment 3). Experiment 4, conducted with the solutions in opposite arms of a T-maze, showed that anticipatory approach to the location correlated with the 32% sucrose solution developed prior to lick suppression on the saccharin solution. However, within daily sessions, there was a reliable increase in contrast without correlated changes in anticipatory-approach behavior. Access-time effects were attributed to altered reward values, whereas spatial-separation effects suggest that goal- directed responses contribute to, but do not cause, anticipatory contrast.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030049263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030049263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03198955

DO - 10.3758/BF03198955

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030049263

VL - 24

SP - 68

EP - 81

JO - Animal Learning and Behavior

JF - Animal Learning and Behavior

SN - 0090-4996

IS - 1

ER -