Anticipatory postural adjustments under simple and choice reaction time conditions

Harm Slijper, Mark Latash, J. Toby Mordkoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two different schemes of the central organization of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) have been proposed: one of them assumes that postural and focal components of an action are results of a single control process (single-process hypothesis) while the other one suggests that these two components result from two relatively independent control processes (dual-process hypothesis). To distinguish between the two hypotheses, we investigated changes in the relative timing of the postural and focal components under self-paced, simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction conditions (CRT). Standing subjects performed one of four small arm movements resulting in a standard postural perturbation (dropping a load). APAs were quantified as changes in the background muscle activity as well as shifts of the center of pressure. APAs occurred at a larger delay prior to the focal movement under the self-paced condition than under the SRT condition. Under the CRT condition, actual RTs were longer than under SRT, but APAs were more similar to those under self-paced conditions. A negative correlation between the reaction time and APA onset was found. The findings demonstrate that the focal and APA components of an action can be decoupled, thus supporting the dual-process hypothesis. Changes in APAs with action suggest a possibility of modifications of a function that transforms two parallel control signals into a single command to the focal and postural muscles, based on postural requirements and behavioral constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-197
Number of pages14
JournalBrain research
Volume924
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 11 2002

Fingerprint

Muscles
Pressure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Molecular Biology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

Slijper, Harm ; Latash, Mark ; Mordkoff, J. Toby. / Anticipatory postural adjustments under simple and choice reaction time conditions. In: Brain research. 2002 ; Vol. 924, No. 2. pp. 184-197.
@article{2dececb6787d4380a950eb316a357fcc,
title = "Anticipatory postural adjustments under simple and choice reaction time conditions",
abstract = "Two different schemes of the central organization of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) have been proposed: one of them assumes that postural and focal components of an action are results of a single control process (single-process hypothesis) while the other one suggests that these two components result from two relatively independent control processes (dual-process hypothesis). To distinguish between the two hypotheses, we investigated changes in the relative timing of the postural and focal components under self-paced, simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction conditions (CRT). Standing subjects performed one of four small arm movements resulting in a standard postural perturbation (dropping a load). APAs were quantified as changes in the background muscle activity as well as shifts of the center of pressure. APAs occurred at a larger delay prior to the focal movement under the self-paced condition than under the SRT condition. Under the CRT condition, actual RTs were longer than under SRT, but APAs were more similar to those under self-paced conditions. A negative correlation between the reaction time and APA onset was found. The findings demonstrate that the focal and APA components of an action can be decoupled, thus supporting the dual-process hypothesis. Changes in APAs with action suggest a possibility of modifications of a function that transforms two parallel control signals into a single command to the focal and postural muscles, based on postural requirements and behavioral constraints.",
author = "Harm Slijper and Mark Latash and Mordkoff, {J. Toby}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03233-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "924",
pages = "184--197",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Anticipatory postural adjustments under simple and choice reaction time conditions. / Slijper, Harm; Latash, Mark; Mordkoff, J. Toby.

In: Brain research, Vol. 924, No. 2, 11.01.2002, p. 184-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anticipatory postural adjustments under simple and choice reaction time conditions

AU - Slijper, Harm

AU - Latash, Mark

AU - Mordkoff, J. Toby

PY - 2002/1/11

Y1 - 2002/1/11

N2 - Two different schemes of the central organization of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) have been proposed: one of them assumes that postural and focal components of an action are results of a single control process (single-process hypothesis) while the other one suggests that these two components result from two relatively independent control processes (dual-process hypothesis). To distinguish between the two hypotheses, we investigated changes in the relative timing of the postural and focal components under self-paced, simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction conditions (CRT). Standing subjects performed one of four small arm movements resulting in a standard postural perturbation (dropping a load). APAs were quantified as changes in the background muscle activity as well as shifts of the center of pressure. APAs occurred at a larger delay prior to the focal movement under the self-paced condition than under the SRT condition. Under the CRT condition, actual RTs were longer than under SRT, but APAs were more similar to those under self-paced conditions. A negative correlation between the reaction time and APA onset was found. The findings demonstrate that the focal and APA components of an action can be decoupled, thus supporting the dual-process hypothesis. Changes in APAs with action suggest a possibility of modifications of a function that transforms two parallel control signals into a single command to the focal and postural muscles, based on postural requirements and behavioral constraints.

AB - Two different schemes of the central organization of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) have been proposed: one of them assumes that postural and focal components of an action are results of a single control process (single-process hypothesis) while the other one suggests that these two components result from two relatively independent control processes (dual-process hypothesis). To distinguish between the two hypotheses, we investigated changes in the relative timing of the postural and focal components under self-paced, simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction conditions (CRT). Standing subjects performed one of four small arm movements resulting in a standard postural perturbation (dropping a load). APAs were quantified as changes in the background muscle activity as well as shifts of the center of pressure. APAs occurred at a larger delay prior to the focal movement under the self-paced condition than under the SRT condition. Under the CRT condition, actual RTs were longer than under SRT, but APAs were more similar to those under self-paced conditions. A negative correlation between the reaction time and APA onset was found. The findings demonstrate that the focal and APA components of an action can be decoupled, thus supporting the dual-process hypothesis. Changes in APAs with action suggest a possibility of modifications of a function that transforms two parallel control signals into a single command to the focal and postural muscles, based on postural requirements and behavioral constraints.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037059595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037059595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03233-4

DO - 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03233-4

M3 - Article

VL - 924

SP - 184

EP - 197

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 2

ER -