Antidepressant treatment in the primary care office: Outcomes for adjustment disorder versus major depression

Usman Hameed, Thomas L. Schwartz, Kamna Malhotra, Rebecca L. West, Francesca Bertone

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Antidepressants are widely used by primary care physicians. Very little comparative data exists regarding the newer antidepressants in regards to efficacy in naturalistic primary care outpatient settings where the treatment of adjustment disorder and major depressive disorder is concerned. Our objective was to determine if there is a difference in antidepressant effectiveness between disorders in the newer antidepressants (SSRIs) in a primary care setting when a formal systematic depression treatment protocol is used. Method. A retrospective review of 63 major depression patients and 33 adjustment disorder patients in a primary care setting was undertaken. Patients had been prescribed mostly SSRIs. DSM-IV symptoms, PHQ-9 depression rating scale scores, and functional disability reports were systematically used to evaluate partial and full remission from patients' depressive states. Results. Neither depressed patients, nor adjustment disordered patients demonstrated a difference in clinical response to any particular antidepressant. The main statistical difference was in response rates, where patients diagnosed with adjustment disorder were twice as likely to respond to standard antidepressant treatment as depressed patients. This retrospective database design with moderate sample size limits the statistical power of this study. Conclusion. Antidepressants are very effective in treating depression in the primary care setting and may even be an effective and efficient treatment for adjustment disorder with depressed mood.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-81
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2005

Fingerprint

Adjustment Disorders
Antidepressive Agents
Primary Health Care
Depression
Therapeutics
Social Adjustment
Major Depressive Disorder
Primary Care Physicians
Clinical Protocols
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Sample Size
Outpatients
Databases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Hameed, Usman ; Schwartz, Thomas L. ; Malhotra, Kamna ; West, Rebecca L. ; Bertone, Francesca. / Antidepressant treatment in the primary care office : Outcomes for adjustment disorder versus major depression. In: Annals of Clinical Psychiatry. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 77-81.
@article{85a39494f6bc499ebfeb653787bcb564,
title = "Antidepressant treatment in the primary care office: Outcomes for adjustment disorder versus major depression",
abstract = "Background. Antidepressants are widely used by primary care physicians. Very little comparative data exists regarding the newer antidepressants in regards to efficacy in naturalistic primary care outpatient settings where the treatment of adjustment disorder and major depressive disorder is concerned. Our objective was to determine if there is a difference in antidepressant effectiveness between disorders in the newer antidepressants (SSRIs) in a primary care setting when a formal systematic depression treatment protocol is used. Method. A retrospective review of 63 major depression patients and 33 adjustment disorder patients in a primary care setting was undertaken. Patients had been prescribed mostly SSRIs. DSM-IV symptoms, PHQ-9 depression rating scale scores, and functional disability reports were systematically used to evaluate partial and full remission from patients' depressive states. Results. Neither depressed patients, nor adjustment disordered patients demonstrated a difference in clinical response to any particular antidepressant. The main statistical difference was in response rates, where patients diagnosed with adjustment disorder were twice as likely to respond to standard antidepressant treatment as depressed patients. This retrospective database design with moderate sample size limits the statistical power of this study. Conclusion. Antidepressants are very effective in treating depression in the primary care setting and may even be an effective and efficient treatment for adjustment disorder with depressed mood.",
author = "Usman Hameed and Schwartz, {Thomas L.} and Kamna Malhotra and West, {Rebecca L.} and Francesca Bertone",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10401230590932344",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "77--81",
journal = "Annals of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "1040-1237",
publisher = "Dowden Health Media,Inc",
number = "2",

}

Antidepressant treatment in the primary care office : Outcomes for adjustment disorder versus major depression. / Hameed, Usman; Schwartz, Thomas L.; Malhotra, Kamna; West, Rebecca L.; Bertone, Francesca.

In: Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.04.2005, p. 77-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antidepressant treatment in the primary care office

T2 - Outcomes for adjustment disorder versus major depression

AU - Hameed, Usman

AU - Schwartz, Thomas L.

AU - Malhotra, Kamna

AU - West, Rebecca L.

AU - Bertone, Francesca

PY - 2005/4/1

Y1 - 2005/4/1

N2 - Background. Antidepressants are widely used by primary care physicians. Very little comparative data exists regarding the newer antidepressants in regards to efficacy in naturalistic primary care outpatient settings where the treatment of adjustment disorder and major depressive disorder is concerned. Our objective was to determine if there is a difference in antidepressant effectiveness between disorders in the newer antidepressants (SSRIs) in a primary care setting when a formal systematic depression treatment protocol is used. Method. A retrospective review of 63 major depression patients and 33 adjustment disorder patients in a primary care setting was undertaken. Patients had been prescribed mostly SSRIs. DSM-IV symptoms, PHQ-9 depression rating scale scores, and functional disability reports were systematically used to evaluate partial and full remission from patients' depressive states. Results. Neither depressed patients, nor adjustment disordered patients demonstrated a difference in clinical response to any particular antidepressant. The main statistical difference was in response rates, where patients diagnosed with adjustment disorder were twice as likely to respond to standard antidepressant treatment as depressed patients. This retrospective database design with moderate sample size limits the statistical power of this study. Conclusion. Antidepressants are very effective in treating depression in the primary care setting and may even be an effective and efficient treatment for adjustment disorder with depressed mood.

AB - Background. Antidepressants are widely used by primary care physicians. Very little comparative data exists regarding the newer antidepressants in regards to efficacy in naturalistic primary care outpatient settings where the treatment of adjustment disorder and major depressive disorder is concerned. Our objective was to determine if there is a difference in antidepressant effectiveness between disorders in the newer antidepressants (SSRIs) in a primary care setting when a formal systematic depression treatment protocol is used. Method. A retrospective review of 63 major depression patients and 33 adjustment disorder patients in a primary care setting was undertaken. Patients had been prescribed mostly SSRIs. DSM-IV symptoms, PHQ-9 depression rating scale scores, and functional disability reports were systematically used to evaluate partial and full remission from patients' depressive states. Results. Neither depressed patients, nor adjustment disordered patients demonstrated a difference in clinical response to any particular antidepressant. The main statistical difference was in response rates, where patients diagnosed with adjustment disorder were twice as likely to respond to standard antidepressant treatment as depressed patients. This retrospective database design with moderate sample size limits the statistical power of this study. Conclusion. Antidepressants are very effective in treating depression in the primary care setting and may even be an effective and efficient treatment for adjustment disorder with depressed mood.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22044443269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22044443269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10401230590932344

DO - 10.1080/10401230590932344

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16075660

AN - SCOPUS:22044443269

VL - 17

SP - 77

EP - 81

JO - Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 1040-1237

IS - 2

ER -