Apple crop load management with special focus on early thinning strategies: A US perspective

Thomas M. Kon, James Rawlinson Schupp

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

There have been several reviews of apple crop load management practices, but few have focused on crop load management strategies prior to petal fall. While use of chemical thinners has been the primary method of managing crop load in modern fruit production, cultural practices such as pruning have been evaluated for use as primary or secondary methods to reduce cropping potential, and initial results appear promising. A significant research effort to screen and develop blossom-thinning products occurred after the loss of Elgetol in 1990. At least 150 chemicals have been evaluated, and the bulk of this review summarizes and catalogs apple blossom thinners. Despite these efforts, the number of chemical blossom thinners that can be legally applied in the USA is limited. However, the development of predictive models to optimize the timing of blossom- thinning applications may dramatically improve the consistency of chemical blossom thinning. Multiple mechanical thinning devices have been developed and are generally effective in reducing cropping potential. However, mechanical thinning technology has some limitations. Since the most recent review on apple crop load management two decades ago in 1999, there have been no new registered postbloom thinners released for commercial use in the USA. However, some new thinning products and decision-making aids show promise, and these are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHorticultural Reviews, Volume 46
Publisherwiley
Pages255-298
Number of pages44
ISBN (Electronic)9781119521082
ISBN (Print)9781119521068
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Malus
deblossoming
thinning (plants)
apples
crops
fruit growing
plant cultural practices
pruning
Decision Support Techniques
corolla
Practice Management
decision making
Fruit
Decision Making
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
methodology
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

@inbook{ce59bc4dfae94d0282afc3b3f2417071,
title = "Apple crop load management with special focus on early thinning strategies: A US perspective",
abstract = "There have been several reviews of apple crop load management practices, but few have focused on crop load management strategies prior to petal fall. While use of chemical thinners has been the primary method of managing crop load in modern fruit production, cultural practices such as pruning have been evaluated for use as primary or secondary methods to reduce cropping potential, and initial results appear promising. A significant research effort to screen and develop blossom-thinning products occurred after the loss of Elgetol in 1990. At least 150 chemicals have been evaluated, and the bulk of this review summarizes and catalogs apple blossom thinners. Despite these efforts, the number of chemical blossom thinners that can be legally applied in the USA is limited. However, the development of predictive models to optimize the timing of blossom- thinning applications may dramatically improve the consistency of chemical blossom thinning. Multiple mechanical thinning devices have been developed and are generally effective in reducing cropping potential. However, mechanical thinning technology has some limitations. Since the most recent review on apple crop load management two decades ago in 1999, there have been no new registered postbloom thinners released for commercial use in the USA. However, some new thinning products and decision-making aids show promise, and these are discussed.",
author = "Kon, {Thomas M.} and Schupp, {James Rawlinson}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/9781119521082.ch6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781119521068",
pages = "255--298",
booktitle = "Horticultural Reviews, Volume 46",
publisher = "wiley",

}

Apple crop load management with special focus on early thinning strategies : A US perspective. / Kon, Thomas M.; Schupp, James Rawlinson.

Horticultural Reviews, Volume 46. wiley, 2018. p. 255-298.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Apple crop load management with special focus on early thinning strategies

T2 - A US perspective

AU - Kon, Thomas M.

AU - Schupp, James Rawlinson

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - There have been several reviews of apple crop load management practices, but few have focused on crop load management strategies prior to petal fall. While use of chemical thinners has been the primary method of managing crop load in modern fruit production, cultural practices such as pruning have been evaluated for use as primary or secondary methods to reduce cropping potential, and initial results appear promising. A significant research effort to screen and develop blossom-thinning products occurred after the loss of Elgetol in 1990. At least 150 chemicals have been evaluated, and the bulk of this review summarizes and catalogs apple blossom thinners. Despite these efforts, the number of chemical blossom thinners that can be legally applied in the USA is limited. However, the development of predictive models to optimize the timing of blossom- thinning applications may dramatically improve the consistency of chemical blossom thinning. Multiple mechanical thinning devices have been developed and are generally effective in reducing cropping potential. However, mechanical thinning technology has some limitations. Since the most recent review on apple crop load management two decades ago in 1999, there have been no new registered postbloom thinners released for commercial use in the USA. However, some new thinning products and decision-making aids show promise, and these are discussed.

AB - There have been several reviews of apple crop load management practices, but few have focused on crop load management strategies prior to petal fall. While use of chemical thinners has been the primary method of managing crop load in modern fruit production, cultural practices such as pruning have been evaluated for use as primary or secondary methods to reduce cropping potential, and initial results appear promising. A significant research effort to screen and develop blossom-thinning products occurred after the loss of Elgetol in 1990. At least 150 chemicals have been evaluated, and the bulk of this review summarizes and catalogs apple blossom thinners. Despite these efforts, the number of chemical blossom thinners that can be legally applied in the USA is limited. However, the development of predictive models to optimize the timing of blossom- thinning applications may dramatically improve the consistency of chemical blossom thinning. Multiple mechanical thinning devices have been developed and are generally effective in reducing cropping potential. However, mechanical thinning technology has some limitations. Since the most recent review on apple crop load management two decades ago in 1999, there have been no new registered postbloom thinners released for commercial use in the USA. However, some new thinning products and decision-making aids show promise, and these are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060808905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060808905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781119521082.ch6

DO - 10.1002/9781119521082.ch6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85060808905

SN - 9781119521068

SP - 255

EP - 298

BT - Horticultural Reviews, Volume 46

PB - wiley

ER -