Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design

Sue L. Niezgoda, Peggy Ann Johnson, Louise O. Slate

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

A low-risk, stream restoration design includes methods that validate design assumptions, incorporate uncertainty in the decision-making process during the project design phase, and reduce uncertainty by checking the final design. A two-step method of incorporating uncertainty and risk in stream restoration design has been developed as a combination of Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and risk quantification. As a first step, DFMEA is applied to identify risk in terms of ratings with respect to consequence of failure, the likelihood of occurrence of a failure, and the ability to detect a failure. Due to its evolutionary nature, the DFMEA can be revised to account for design modifications and relative ratings are re-evaluated to examine reductions in uncertainty, and thereby, risk. The second step of the method is quantifying risk using initial and expected failure costs. Expected failure cost is defined as the product of probability of failure and the cost associated with failure. Since failure probability and cost of failure are both difficult to determine directly in stream restoration, the consequence and likelihood of occurrence ratings from the DFMEA can be used to estimate the expected cost and probability of failure, respectively. Using this method, risk can be estimated for several restoration design alternatives and compared to provide justification and guidance on selecting the most cost effective design alternative. The two-step, risk-based method is illustrated through application to a stream relocation project in Pennsylvania and a stream restoration project in North Carolina. Overall, the two-step method presented here can prove valuable in decision-making and will improve the likelihood of success in stream restoration design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRestoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress
StatePublished - 2007
Event2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress: Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Tampa, FL, United States
Duration: May 15 2007May 19 2007

Other

Other2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress: Restoring Our Natural Habitat
CountryUnited States
CityTampa, FL
Period5/15/075/19/07

Fingerprint

Risk assessment
Restoration
risk assessment
cost
Costs
Failure modes
restoration
decision making
Decision making
project design
relocation
design method
Relocation
method
analysis
effect

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Niezgoda, S. L., Johnson, P. A., & Slate, L. O. (2007). Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design. In Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress
Niezgoda, Sue L. ; Johnson, Peggy Ann ; Slate, Louise O. / Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design. Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. 2007.
@inproceedings{0b18c08f8a5945c3af570141bb9a533f,
title = "Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design",
abstract = "A low-risk, stream restoration design includes methods that validate design assumptions, incorporate uncertainty in the decision-making process during the project design phase, and reduce uncertainty by checking the final design. A two-step method of incorporating uncertainty and risk in stream restoration design has been developed as a combination of Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and risk quantification. As a first step, DFMEA is applied to identify risk in terms of ratings with respect to consequence of failure, the likelihood of occurrence of a failure, and the ability to detect a failure. Due to its evolutionary nature, the DFMEA can be revised to account for design modifications and relative ratings are re-evaluated to examine reductions in uncertainty, and thereby, risk. The second step of the method is quantifying risk using initial and expected failure costs. Expected failure cost is defined as the product of probability of failure and the cost associated with failure. Since failure probability and cost of failure are both difficult to determine directly in stream restoration, the consequence and likelihood of occurrence ratings from the DFMEA can be used to estimate the expected cost and probability of failure, respectively. Using this method, risk can be estimated for several restoration design alternatives and compared to provide justification and guidance on selecting the most cost effective design alternative. The two-step, risk-based method is illustrated through application to a stream relocation project in Pennsylvania and a stream restoration project in North Carolina. Overall, the two-step method presented here can prove valuable in decision-making and will improve the likelihood of success in stream restoration design.",
author = "Niezgoda, {Sue L.} and Johnson, {Peggy Ann} and Slate, {Louise O.}",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784409275",
booktitle = "Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress",

}

Niezgoda, SL, Johnson, PA & Slate, LO 2007, Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design. in Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress: Restoring Our Natural Habitat, Tampa, FL, United States, 5/15/07.

Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design. / Niezgoda, Sue L.; Johnson, Peggy Ann; Slate, Louise O.

Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. 2007.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design

AU - Niezgoda, Sue L.

AU - Johnson, Peggy Ann

AU - Slate, Louise O.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - A low-risk, stream restoration design includes methods that validate design assumptions, incorporate uncertainty in the decision-making process during the project design phase, and reduce uncertainty by checking the final design. A two-step method of incorporating uncertainty and risk in stream restoration design has been developed as a combination of Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and risk quantification. As a first step, DFMEA is applied to identify risk in terms of ratings with respect to consequence of failure, the likelihood of occurrence of a failure, and the ability to detect a failure. Due to its evolutionary nature, the DFMEA can be revised to account for design modifications and relative ratings are re-evaluated to examine reductions in uncertainty, and thereby, risk. The second step of the method is quantifying risk using initial and expected failure costs. Expected failure cost is defined as the product of probability of failure and the cost associated with failure. Since failure probability and cost of failure are both difficult to determine directly in stream restoration, the consequence and likelihood of occurrence ratings from the DFMEA can be used to estimate the expected cost and probability of failure, respectively. Using this method, risk can be estimated for several restoration design alternatives and compared to provide justification and guidance on selecting the most cost effective design alternative. The two-step, risk-based method is illustrated through application to a stream relocation project in Pennsylvania and a stream restoration project in North Carolina. Overall, the two-step method presented here can prove valuable in decision-making and will improve the likelihood of success in stream restoration design.

AB - A low-risk, stream restoration design includes methods that validate design assumptions, incorporate uncertainty in the decision-making process during the project design phase, and reduce uncertainty by checking the final design. A two-step method of incorporating uncertainty and risk in stream restoration design has been developed as a combination of Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and risk quantification. As a first step, DFMEA is applied to identify risk in terms of ratings with respect to consequence of failure, the likelihood of occurrence of a failure, and the ability to detect a failure. Due to its evolutionary nature, the DFMEA can be revised to account for design modifications and relative ratings are re-evaluated to examine reductions in uncertainty, and thereby, risk. The second step of the method is quantifying risk using initial and expected failure costs. Expected failure cost is defined as the product of probability of failure and the cost associated with failure. Since failure probability and cost of failure are both difficult to determine directly in stream restoration, the consequence and likelihood of occurrence ratings from the DFMEA can be used to estimate the expected cost and probability of failure, respectively. Using this method, risk can be estimated for several restoration design alternatives and compared to provide justification and guidance on selecting the most cost effective design alternative. The two-step, risk-based method is illustrated through application to a stream relocation project in Pennsylvania and a stream restoration project in North Carolina. Overall, the two-step method presented here can prove valuable in decision-making and will improve the likelihood of success in stream restoration design.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051616111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051616111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780784409275

BT - Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress

ER -

Niezgoda SL, Johnson PA, Slate LO. Applying cost-based risk assessment to stream restoration design. In Restoring Our Natural Habitat - Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. 2007