Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample: A test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis

Sandra G. Zakowski, Martica H. Hall, Laura Cousino Klein, Andrew Baum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lazarus and Folkman proposed one of the most comprehensive theories of stress and coping in the psychology literature, but many of their postulates have received little empirical attention, and some of the existing research has yielded contradictory findings. This longitudinal study sought to clarify the associations among control appraisal, coping, and stress within this theoretical framework. The theory postulates that coping strategies used tend to match the level of appraised controllability of the stressor (matching hypothesis). It further states that the effects of problem-focused versus emotion-focused coping are moderated by the appraised controllability of the stressor (goodness-of-fit hypothesis). An alternative to the latter is the main-effects hypothesis, which states that problem-focused coping is generally more effective in reducing distress regardless of appraisal. These hypotheses were tested on 72 adults who completed questionnaires on coping and control appraisal. Stress was assessed using self-report (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised) and a behavioral measure (proofreading task) at two times approximately 2 months apart. Appraised control significantly predicted type of coping such that greater control was associated with more problem-focused and less emotion-focused coping. Although the main-effects hypothesis was not supported, the goodness-of-fit hypothesis was partly confirmed by a significant control by emotion-focused coping interaction predicting both self-report and behavioral measures of stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-165
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Emotions
Self Report
Checklist
Longitudinal Studies
Psychology
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{be7c6cc695f8400fb8d0082a070371b3,
title = "Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample: A test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis",
abstract = "Lazarus and Folkman proposed one of the most comprehensive theories of stress and coping in the psychology literature, but many of their postulates have received little empirical attention, and some of the existing research has yielded contradictory findings. This longitudinal study sought to clarify the associations among control appraisal, coping, and stress within this theoretical framework. The theory postulates that coping strategies used tend to match the level of appraised controllability of the stressor (matching hypothesis). It further states that the effects of problem-focused versus emotion-focused coping are moderated by the appraised controllability of the stressor (goodness-of-fit hypothesis). An alternative to the latter is the main-effects hypothesis, which states that problem-focused coping is generally more effective in reducing distress regardless of appraisal. These hypotheses were tested on 72 adults who completed questionnaires on coping and control appraisal. Stress was assessed using self-report (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised) and a behavioral measure (proofreading task) at two times approximately 2 months apart. Appraised control significantly predicted type of coping such that greater control was associated with more problem-focused and less emotion-focused coping. Although the main-effects hypothesis was not supported, the goodness-of-fit hypothesis was partly confirmed by a significant control by emotion-focused coping interaction predicting both self-report and behavioral measures of stress.",
author = "Zakowski, {Sandra G.} and Hall, {Martica H.} and Klein, {Laura Cousino} and Andrew Baum",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/S15324796ABM2303_3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "158--165",
journal = "Annals of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0883-6612",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample : A test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis. / Zakowski, Sandra G.; Hall, Martica H.; Klein, Laura Cousino; Baum, Andrew.

In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 158-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample

T2 - A test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis

AU - Zakowski, Sandra G.

AU - Hall, Martica H.

AU - Klein, Laura Cousino

AU - Baum, Andrew

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Lazarus and Folkman proposed one of the most comprehensive theories of stress and coping in the psychology literature, but many of their postulates have received little empirical attention, and some of the existing research has yielded contradictory findings. This longitudinal study sought to clarify the associations among control appraisal, coping, and stress within this theoretical framework. The theory postulates that coping strategies used tend to match the level of appraised controllability of the stressor (matching hypothesis). It further states that the effects of problem-focused versus emotion-focused coping are moderated by the appraised controllability of the stressor (goodness-of-fit hypothesis). An alternative to the latter is the main-effects hypothesis, which states that problem-focused coping is generally more effective in reducing distress regardless of appraisal. These hypotheses were tested on 72 adults who completed questionnaires on coping and control appraisal. Stress was assessed using self-report (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised) and a behavioral measure (proofreading task) at two times approximately 2 months apart. Appraised control significantly predicted type of coping such that greater control was associated with more problem-focused and less emotion-focused coping. Although the main-effects hypothesis was not supported, the goodness-of-fit hypothesis was partly confirmed by a significant control by emotion-focused coping interaction predicting both self-report and behavioral measures of stress.

AB - Lazarus and Folkman proposed one of the most comprehensive theories of stress and coping in the psychology literature, but many of their postulates have received little empirical attention, and some of the existing research has yielded contradictory findings. This longitudinal study sought to clarify the associations among control appraisal, coping, and stress within this theoretical framework. The theory postulates that coping strategies used tend to match the level of appraised controllability of the stressor (matching hypothesis). It further states that the effects of problem-focused versus emotion-focused coping are moderated by the appraised controllability of the stressor (goodness-of-fit hypothesis). An alternative to the latter is the main-effects hypothesis, which states that problem-focused coping is generally more effective in reducing distress regardless of appraisal. These hypotheses were tested on 72 adults who completed questionnaires on coping and control appraisal. Stress was assessed using self-report (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised) and a behavioral measure (proofreading task) at two times approximately 2 months apart. Appraised control significantly predicted type of coping such that greater control was associated with more problem-focused and less emotion-focused coping. Although the main-effects hypothesis was not supported, the goodness-of-fit hypothesis was partly confirmed by a significant control by emotion-focused coping interaction predicting both self-report and behavioral measures of stress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034896935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034896935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/S15324796ABM2303_3

DO - 10.1207/S15324796ABM2303_3

M3 - Article

C2 - 11495216

AN - SCOPUS:0034896935

VL - 23

SP - 158

EP - 165

JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0883-6612

IS - 3

ER -