Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances.

Megan C. McHugh, Jillian B. Harvey, Dasha Aseyev, Jeffrey A. Alexander, Jeff Beich, Dennis P. Scanlon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our purposes were: (1) to describe how 14 multi-stakeholder alliances participating in the Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative approached the charge of improving healthcare delivery at the community level between 2006 and 2010; and (2) to offer insights to policy makers and program planners seeking to promote or establish community-wide quality improvement (QI). This was a qualitative study. A total of 84 semi-structured interviews were conducted with AF4Q alliance leaders between 2006 and 2010, and an iterative coding process was used to identify salient themes. Program documents supplemented the interview data and were used to develop an inventory of the alliances' QI activities using the Leatherman and Sutherland taxonomy of quality-enhancing interventions. Alliances spent years planning their QI approaches and activities. Initial selection of QI activities was driven by the availability of local expertise and resources, rather than alignment with a community-wide vision for quality. Alliances were just as likely to rely on local partners to lead QI activities as they were to establish their own activities. The most commonly adopted QI activities were collaboratives aimed at producing organizational-level changes. Policy makers and program planners seeking to promote community-wide QI should consider developing clear expectations, offering technical assistance at the start of the program, providing information on the evidence base for QI activities, and highlighting additional funding opportunities that could support QI activities. Alliances may need a stronger push to move beyond coordinated, organizational-level activities to more community-focused, cross-organizational QI activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)s156-162
JournalThe American journal of managed care
Volume18
Issue number6 Suppl
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Delivery of Health Care
Administrative Personnel
Interviews
Organizational Innovation
Equipment and Supplies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

McHugh, M. C., Harvey, J. B., Aseyev, D., Alexander, J. A., Beich, J., & Scanlon, D. P. (2012). Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances. The American journal of managed care, 18(6 Suppl), s156-162.
McHugh, Megan C. ; Harvey, Jillian B. ; Aseyev, Dasha ; Alexander, Jeffrey A. ; Beich, Jeff ; Scanlon, Dennis P. / Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances. In: The American journal of managed care. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 6 Suppl. pp. s156-162.
@article{d611b1afbaf6475fac42a095c7d3516a,
title = "Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances.",
abstract = "Our purposes were: (1) to describe how 14 multi-stakeholder alliances participating in the Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative approached the charge of improving healthcare delivery at the community level between 2006 and 2010; and (2) to offer insights to policy makers and program planners seeking to promote or establish community-wide quality improvement (QI). This was a qualitative study. A total of 84 semi-structured interviews were conducted with AF4Q alliance leaders between 2006 and 2010, and an iterative coding process was used to identify salient themes. Program documents supplemented the interview data and were used to develop an inventory of the alliances' QI activities using the Leatherman and Sutherland taxonomy of quality-enhancing interventions. Alliances spent years planning their QI approaches and activities. Initial selection of QI activities was driven by the availability of local expertise and resources, rather than alignment with a community-wide vision for quality. Alliances were just as likely to rely on local partners to lead QI activities as they were to establish their own activities. The most commonly adopted QI activities were collaboratives aimed at producing organizational-level changes. Policy makers and program planners seeking to promote community-wide QI should consider developing clear expectations, offering technical assistance at the start of the program, providing information on the evidence base for QI activities, and highlighting additional funding opportunities that could support QI activities. Alliances may need a stronger push to move beyond coordinated, organizational-level activities to more community-focused, cross-organizational QI activities.",
author = "McHugh, {Megan C.} and Harvey, {Jillian B.} and Dasha Aseyev and Alexander, {Jeffrey A.} and Jeff Beich and Scanlon, {Dennis P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "s156--162",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "6 Suppl",

}

McHugh, MC, Harvey, JB, Aseyev, D, Alexander, JA, Beich, J & Scanlon, DP 2012, 'Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances.', The American journal of managed care, vol. 18, no. 6 Suppl, pp. s156-162.

Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances. / McHugh, Megan C.; Harvey, Jillian B.; Aseyev, Dasha; Alexander, Jeffrey A.; Beich, Jeff; Scanlon, Dennis P.

In: The American journal of managed care, Vol. 18, No. 6 Suppl, 09.2012, p. s156-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances.

AU - McHugh, Megan C.

AU - Harvey, Jillian B.

AU - Aseyev, Dasha

AU - Alexander, Jeffrey A.

AU - Beich, Jeff

AU - Scanlon, Dennis P.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Our purposes were: (1) to describe how 14 multi-stakeholder alliances participating in the Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative approached the charge of improving healthcare delivery at the community level between 2006 and 2010; and (2) to offer insights to policy makers and program planners seeking to promote or establish community-wide quality improvement (QI). This was a qualitative study. A total of 84 semi-structured interviews were conducted with AF4Q alliance leaders between 2006 and 2010, and an iterative coding process was used to identify salient themes. Program documents supplemented the interview data and were used to develop an inventory of the alliances' QI activities using the Leatherman and Sutherland taxonomy of quality-enhancing interventions. Alliances spent years planning their QI approaches and activities. Initial selection of QI activities was driven by the availability of local expertise and resources, rather than alignment with a community-wide vision for quality. Alliances were just as likely to rely on local partners to lead QI activities as they were to establish their own activities. The most commonly adopted QI activities were collaboratives aimed at producing organizational-level changes. Policy makers and program planners seeking to promote community-wide QI should consider developing clear expectations, offering technical assistance at the start of the program, providing information on the evidence base for QI activities, and highlighting additional funding opportunities that could support QI activities. Alliances may need a stronger push to move beyond coordinated, organizational-level activities to more community-focused, cross-organizational QI activities.

AB - Our purposes were: (1) to describe how 14 multi-stakeholder alliances participating in the Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative approached the charge of improving healthcare delivery at the community level between 2006 and 2010; and (2) to offer insights to policy makers and program planners seeking to promote or establish community-wide quality improvement (QI). This was a qualitative study. A total of 84 semi-structured interviews were conducted with AF4Q alliance leaders between 2006 and 2010, and an iterative coding process was used to identify salient themes. Program documents supplemented the interview data and were used to develop an inventory of the alliances' QI activities using the Leatherman and Sutherland taxonomy of quality-enhancing interventions. Alliances spent years planning their QI approaches and activities. Initial selection of QI activities was driven by the availability of local expertise and resources, rather than alignment with a community-wide vision for quality. Alliances were just as likely to rely on local partners to lead QI activities as they were to establish their own activities. The most commonly adopted QI activities were collaboratives aimed at producing organizational-level changes. Policy makers and program planners seeking to promote community-wide QI should consider developing clear expectations, offering technical assistance at the start of the program, providing information on the evidence base for QI activities, and highlighting additional funding opportunities that could support QI activities. Alliances may need a stronger push to move beyond coordinated, organizational-level activities to more community-focused, cross-organizational QI activities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891609798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891609798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23286711

AN - SCOPUS:84891609798

VL - 18

SP - s156-162

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 6 Suppl

ER -

McHugh MC, Harvey JB, Aseyev D, Alexander JA, Beich J, Scanlon DP. Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances. The American journal of managed care. 2012 Sep;18(6 Suppl):s156-162.