Are children with autism more responsive to animated characters? A study of interactions with humans and human-controlled avatars

Elizabeth J. Carter, Diane L. Williams, Jessica K. Hodgins, Jill F. Lehman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few direct comparisons have been made between the responsiveness of children with autism to computer-generated or animated characters and their responsiveness to humans. Twelve 4- to 8-year-old children with autism interacted with a human therapist; a human-controlled, interactive avatar in a theme park; a human actor speaking like the avatar; and cartoon characters who sought social responses. We found superior gestural and verbal responses to the therapist; intermediate response levels to the avatar and the actor; and poorest responses to the cartoon characters, although attention was equivalent across conditions. These results suggest that even avatars that provide live, responsive interactions are not superior to human therapists in eliciting verbal and non-verbal communication from children with autism in this age range.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2475-2485
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume44
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Cartoons
Communication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{267f3e814b55428c9fe96ce4efe4cad0,
title = "Are children with autism more responsive to animated characters? A study of interactions with humans and human-controlled avatars",
abstract = "Few direct comparisons have been made between the responsiveness of children with autism to computer-generated or animated characters and their responsiveness to humans. Twelve 4- to 8-year-old children with autism interacted with a human therapist; a human-controlled, interactive avatar in a theme park; a human actor speaking like the avatar; and cartoon characters who sought social responses. We found superior gestural and verbal responses to the therapist; intermediate response levels to the avatar and the actor; and poorest responses to the cartoon characters, although attention was equivalent across conditions. These results suggest that even avatars that provide live, responsive interactions are not superior to human therapists in eliciting verbal and non-verbal communication from children with autism in this age range.",
author = "Carter, {Elizabeth J.} and Williams, {Diane L.} and Hodgins, {Jessica K.} and Lehman, {Jill F.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10803-014-2116-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "2475--2485",
journal = "Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders",
issn = "0162-3257",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

Are children with autism more responsive to animated characters? A study of interactions with humans and human-controlled avatars. / Carter, Elizabeth J.; Williams, Diane L.; Hodgins, Jessica K.; Lehman, Jill F.

In: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Vol. 44, No. 10, 01.01.2014, p. 2475-2485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are children with autism more responsive to animated characters? A study of interactions with humans and human-controlled avatars

AU - Carter, Elizabeth J.

AU - Williams, Diane L.

AU - Hodgins, Jessica K.

AU - Lehman, Jill F.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Few direct comparisons have been made between the responsiveness of children with autism to computer-generated or animated characters and their responsiveness to humans. Twelve 4- to 8-year-old children with autism interacted with a human therapist; a human-controlled, interactive avatar in a theme park; a human actor speaking like the avatar; and cartoon characters who sought social responses. We found superior gestural and verbal responses to the therapist; intermediate response levels to the avatar and the actor; and poorest responses to the cartoon characters, although attention was equivalent across conditions. These results suggest that even avatars that provide live, responsive interactions are not superior to human therapists in eliciting verbal and non-verbal communication from children with autism in this age range.

AB - Few direct comparisons have been made between the responsiveness of children with autism to computer-generated or animated characters and their responsiveness to humans. Twelve 4- to 8-year-old children with autism interacted with a human therapist; a human-controlled, interactive avatar in a theme park; a human actor speaking like the avatar; and cartoon characters who sought social responses. We found superior gestural and verbal responses to the therapist; intermediate response levels to the avatar and the actor; and poorest responses to the cartoon characters, although attention was equivalent across conditions. These results suggest that even avatars that provide live, responsive interactions are not superior to human therapists in eliciting verbal and non-verbal communication from children with autism in this age range.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912042385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912042385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10803-014-2116-8

DO - 10.1007/s10803-014-2116-8

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 2475

EP - 2485

JO - Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

JF - Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

SN - 0162-3257

IS - 10

ER -