Are coups good for democracy? A response to Miller (2016)

George Derpanopoulos, Erica Frantz, Barbara Geddes, Joseph Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article responds to “Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy?” (Miller MK (2016) Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy? Research and Politics 3(4): ) We make clear to readers that Miller (2016) re-reports findings that we originally reported in the Appendix to our original article. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different estimators and re-state Miller’s main point with a visual presentation of how regime-case and country fixed effects estimators differ in this application.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalResearch and Politics
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

democracy
regime
politics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Derpanopoulos, George ; Frantz, Erica ; Geddes, Barbara ; Wright, Joseph. / Are coups good for democracy? A response to Miller (2016). In: Research and Politics. 2017 ; Vol. 4, No. 2.
@article{c5e980e7b39e4dfcbe2e1c4006f671ce,
title = "Are coups good for democracy? A response to Miller (2016)",
abstract = "This article responds to “Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy?” (Miller MK (2016) Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy? Research and Politics 3(4): ) We make clear to readers that Miller (2016) re-reports findings that we originally reported in the Appendix to our original article. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different estimators and re-state Miller’s main point with a visual presentation of how regime-case and country fixed effects estimators differ in this application.",
author = "George Derpanopoulos and Erica Frantz and Barbara Geddes and Joseph Wright",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2053168017707355",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Research and Politics",
issn = "2053-1680",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Are coups good for democracy? A response to Miller (2016). / Derpanopoulos, George; Frantz, Erica; Geddes, Barbara; Wright, Joseph.

In: Research and Politics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.04.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are coups good for democracy? A response to Miller (2016)

AU - Derpanopoulos, George

AU - Frantz, Erica

AU - Geddes, Barbara

AU - Wright, Joseph

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - This article responds to “Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy?” (Miller MK (2016) Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy? Research and Politics 3(4): ) We make clear to readers that Miller (2016) re-reports findings that we originally reported in the Appendix to our original article. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different estimators and re-state Miller’s main point with a visual presentation of how regime-case and country fixed effects estimators differ in this application.

AB - This article responds to “Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy?” (Miller MK (2016) Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy? Research and Politics 3(4): ) We make clear to readers that Miller (2016) re-reports findings that we originally reported in the Appendix to our original article. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different estimators and re-state Miller’s main point with a visual presentation of how regime-case and country fixed effects estimators differ in this application.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048749110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048749110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2053168017707355

DO - 10.1177/2053168017707355

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85048749110

VL - 4

JO - Research and Politics

JF - Research and Politics

SN - 2053-1680

IS - 2

ER -