Are emotions abstract or concrete? An ERP study on affect representations

Xu Xu, Chunyan Kang, Kaia Sword, Taomei Guo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to identify and communicate emotions is essential to psychological well-being. Yet research focusing exclusively on emotion concepts has been limited. This study examined nouns that represent emotions (e.g., pleasure, guilt) in comparison to nouns that represent abstract (e.g., wisdom, failure) and concrete entities (e.g., flower, coffin). Twenty-five healthy participants completed a lexical decision task. Event-related potential (ERP) data showed that emotion nouns elicited less pronounced N400 than both abstract and concrete nouns. Further, N400 amplitude differences between emotion and concrete nouns were evident in both hemispheres, whereas the differences between emotion and abstract nouns had a left-lateralized distribution. These findings suggest representational distinctions, possibly in both verbal and imagery systems, between emotion concepts versus other concepts, implications of which for theories of affect representations and for research on affect disorders merit further investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-324
Number of pages10
JournalExperimental Psychology
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Emotions
Aptitude
Pleasure
Guilt
Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Emotion
Event-related Potentials
Research
Healthy Volunteers
Psychology
Nouns

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Xu, Xu ; Kang, Chunyan ; Sword, Kaia ; Guo, Taomei. / Are emotions abstract or concrete? An ERP study on affect representations. In: Experimental Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 64, No. 5. pp. 315-324.
@article{7a9ca341c2114d80882e576aa8762096,
title = "Are emotions abstract or concrete? An ERP study on affect representations",
abstract = "The ability to identify and communicate emotions is essential to psychological well-being. Yet research focusing exclusively on emotion concepts has been limited. This study examined nouns that represent emotions (e.g., pleasure, guilt) in comparison to nouns that represent abstract (e.g., wisdom, failure) and concrete entities (e.g., flower, coffin). Twenty-five healthy participants completed a lexical decision task. Event-related potential (ERP) data showed that emotion nouns elicited less pronounced N400 than both abstract and concrete nouns. Further, N400 amplitude differences between emotion and concrete nouns were evident in both hemispheres, whereas the differences between emotion and abstract nouns had a left-lateralized distribution. These findings suggest representational distinctions, possibly in both verbal and imagery systems, between emotion concepts versus other concepts, implications of which for theories of affect representations and for research on affect disorders merit further investigation.",
author = "Xu Xu and Chunyan Kang and Kaia Sword and Taomei Guo",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1027/1618-3169/a000374",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "315--324",
journal = "Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1618-3169",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "5",

}

Are emotions abstract or concrete? An ERP study on affect representations. / Xu, Xu; Kang, Chunyan; Sword, Kaia; Guo, Taomei.

In: Experimental Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 5, 09.2017, p. 315-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are emotions abstract or concrete? An ERP study on affect representations

AU - Xu, Xu

AU - Kang, Chunyan

AU - Sword, Kaia

AU - Guo, Taomei

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - The ability to identify and communicate emotions is essential to psychological well-being. Yet research focusing exclusively on emotion concepts has been limited. This study examined nouns that represent emotions (e.g., pleasure, guilt) in comparison to nouns that represent abstract (e.g., wisdom, failure) and concrete entities (e.g., flower, coffin). Twenty-five healthy participants completed a lexical decision task. Event-related potential (ERP) data showed that emotion nouns elicited less pronounced N400 than both abstract and concrete nouns. Further, N400 amplitude differences between emotion and concrete nouns were evident in both hemispheres, whereas the differences between emotion and abstract nouns had a left-lateralized distribution. These findings suggest representational distinctions, possibly in both verbal and imagery systems, between emotion concepts versus other concepts, implications of which for theories of affect representations and for research on affect disorders merit further investigation.

AB - The ability to identify and communicate emotions is essential to psychological well-being. Yet research focusing exclusively on emotion concepts has been limited. This study examined nouns that represent emotions (e.g., pleasure, guilt) in comparison to nouns that represent abstract (e.g., wisdom, failure) and concrete entities (e.g., flower, coffin). Twenty-five healthy participants completed a lexical decision task. Event-related potential (ERP) data showed that emotion nouns elicited less pronounced N400 than both abstract and concrete nouns. Further, N400 amplitude differences between emotion and concrete nouns were evident in both hemispheres, whereas the differences between emotion and abstract nouns had a left-lateralized distribution. These findings suggest representational distinctions, possibly in both verbal and imagery systems, between emotion concepts versus other concepts, implications of which for theories of affect representations and for research on affect disorders merit further investigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036586521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036586521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000374

DO - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000374

M3 - Article

C2 - 29173138

AN - SCOPUS:85036586521

VL - 64

SP - 315

EP - 324

JO - Experimental Psychology

JF - Experimental Psychology

SN - 1618-3169

IS - 5

ER -