Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey

Jan M.L. Bosmans, Melissa Dhondt, Lize Smits, Michael Bruno, Paul M. Parizel, Paul Gemmel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Patient empowerment requires that patients have enough information to make decisions concerning their own health. If patients are to discuss imaging results with radiologists, they have to know who these medical professionals are and what they do. Purpose To examine whether patients understand the role of radiologists, and if particular subgroups are better informed than other ones. Material and Methods Consecutive radiology outpatients in eight radiology centers could complete a web-based or printed questionnaire. Respondents indicated on a five-point Likert scale their level of agreement with 18 statements on the role of radiologists and their preferences concerning contacts with radiologists. Results were rearranged to allow comparison of predetermined subgroups. Dichotomous results were analyzed using χ2 statistics. Results A total of 1,146 questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. Results showed confusion as to the question whether radiologists are medically qualified and enjoy all the privileges thereof. Medically qualified or highly educated respondents were modestly better informed. Patients in private practice were better informed than outpatients in hospitals. Conclusion Patient empowerment requires better understanding of the role of radiologists. Different population subgroups necessitate specific information strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1089-1098
Number of pages10
JournalActa Radiologica
Volume57
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Communication
Patient Participation
Radiology
Outpatients
Confusion
Private Practice
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiologists
Health
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Bosmans, J. M. L., Dhondt, M., Smits, L., Bruno, M., Parizel, P. M., & Gemmel, P. (2016). Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey. Acta Radiologica, 57(9), 1089-1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185115617348
Bosmans, Jan M.L. ; Dhondt, Melissa ; Smits, Lize ; Bruno, Michael ; Parizel, Paul M. ; Gemmel, Paul. / Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey. In: Acta Radiologica. 2016 ; Vol. 57, No. 9. pp. 1089-1098.
@article{77bb38c349514c269bf69bef5de10212,
title = "Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey",
abstract = "Background Patient empowerment requires that patients have enough information to make decisions concerning their own health. If patients are to discuss imaging results with radiologists, they have to know who these medical professionals are and what they do. Purpose To examine whether patients understand the role of radiologists, and if particular subgroups are better informed than other ones. Material and Methods Consecutive radiology outpatients in eight radiology centers could complete a web-based or printed questionnaire. Respondents indicated on a five-point Likert scale their level of agreement with 18 statements on the role of radiologists and their preferences concerning contacts with radiologists. Results were rearranged to allow comparison of predetermined subgroups. Dichotomous results were analyzed using χ2 statistics. Results A total of 1,146 questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. Results showed confusion as to the question whether radiologists are medically qualified and enjoy all the privileges thereof. Medically qualified or highly educated respondents were modestly better informed. Patients in private practice were better informed than outpatients in hospitals. Conclusion Patient empowerment requires better understanding of the role of radiologists. Different population subgroups necessitate specific information strategies.",
author = "Bosmans, {Jan M.L.} and Melissa Dhondt and Lize Smits and Michael Bruno and Parizel, {Paul M.} and Paul Gemmel",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0284185115617348",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "1089--1098",
journal = "Acta Radiologica",
issn = "0284-1851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "9",

}

Bosmans, JML, Dhondt, M, Smits, L, Bruno, M, Parizel, PM & Gemmel, P 2016, 'Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey', Acta Radiologica, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1089-1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185115617348

Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey. / Bosmans, Jan M.L.; Dhondt, Melissa; Smits, Lize; Bruno, Michael; Parizel, Paul M.; Gemmel, Paul.

In: Acta Radiologica, Vol. 57, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 1089-1098.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey

AU - Bosmans, Jan M.L.

AU - Dhondt, Melissa

AU - Smits, Lize

AU - Bruno, Michael

AU - Parizel, Paul M.

AU - Gemmel, Paul

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background Patient empowerment requires that patients have enough information to make decisions concerning their own health. If patients are to discuss imaging results with radiologists, they have to know who these medical professionals are and what they do. Purpose To examine whether patients understand the role of radiologists, and if particular subgroups are better informed than other ones. Material and Methods Consecutive radiology outpatients in eight radiology centers could complete a web-based or printed questionnaire. Respondents indicated on a five-point Likert scale their level of agreement with 18 statements on the role of radiologists and their preferences concerning contacts with radiologists. Results were rearranged to allow comparison of predetermined subgroups. Dichotomous results were analyzed using χ2 statistics. Results A total of 1,146 questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. Results showed confusion as to the question whether radiologists are medically qualified and enjoy all the privileges thereof. Medically qualified or highly educated respondents were modestly better informed. Patients in private practice were better informed than outpatients in hospitals. Conclusion Patient empowerment requires better understanding of the role of radiologists. Different population subgroups necessitate specific information strategies.

AB - Background Patient empowerment requires that patients have enough information to make decisions concerning their own health. If patients are to discuss imaging results with radiologists, they have to know who these medical professionals are and what they do. Purpose To examine whether patients understand the role of radiologists, and if particular subgroups are better informed than other ones. Material and Methods Consecutive radiology outpatients in eight radiology centers could complete a web-based or printed questionnaire. Respondents indicated on a five-point Likert scale their level of agreement with 18 statements on the role of radiologists and their preferences concerning contacts with radiologists. Results were rearranged to allow comparison of predetermined subgroups. Dichotomous results were analyzed using χ2 statistics. Results A total of 1,146 questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. Results showed confusion as to the question whether radiologists are medically qualified and enjoy all the privileges thereof. Medically qualified or highly educated respondents were modestly better informed. Patients in private practice were better informed than outpatients in hospitals. Conclusion Patient empowerment requires better understanding of the role of radiologists. Different population subgroups necessitate specific information strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985911262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985911262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0284185115617348

DO - 10.1177/0284185115617348

M3 - Article

C2 - 26622059

AN - SCOPUS:84985911262

VL - 57

SP - 1089

EP - 1098

JO - Acta Radiologica

JF - Acta Radiologica

SN - 0284-1851

IS - 9

ER -