Are researchers ethically obligated to report suspected child maltreatment? A critical analysis of opposing perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of authors have commented on the topic of mandated reporting in cases of suspected child maltreatment and the application of this requirement to researchers. Most of these commentaries focus on the interpretation of current legal standards and offer opinions for or against the imposition of mandated reporting laws on research activities. Authors on both sides of the issue offer ethical arguments, although a direct comparison and analysis of these opposing arguments is rare. This article critically examines the ethical arguments made by authors on both sides of the debate. The conclusion is reached that researchers should be mandated reporters of child maltreatment because the current arguments do not justify their exclusion from current ethical and legal standards. The author makes recommendations for the ethically responsible conduct of research in regard to this topic and legal implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-24
Number of pages10
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Child Abuse
Research Personnel
Research
Ethics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{499fc76d269a47ac94be523551dd2314,
title = "Are researchers ethically obligated to report suspected child maltreatment? A critical analysis of opposing perspectives",
abstract = "A number of authors have commented on the topic of mandated reporting in cases of suspected child maltreatment and the application of this requirement to researchers. Most of these commentaries focus on the interpretation of current legal standards and offer opinions for or against the imposition of mandated reporting laws on research activities. Authors on both sides of the issue offer ethical arguments, although a direct comparison and analysis of these opposing arguments is rare. This article critically examines the ethical arguments made by authors on both sides of the debate. The conclusion is reached that researchers should be mandated reporters of child maltreatment because the current arguments do not justify their exclusion from current ethical and legal standards. The author makes recommendations for the ethically responsible conduct of research in regard to this topic and legal implications are discussed.",
author = "Brian Allen",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10508420802623641",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "15--24",
journal = "Ethics and Behavior",
issn = "1050-8422",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are researchers ethically obligated to report suspected child maltreatment? A critical analysis of opposing perspectives

AU - Allen, Brian

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - A number of authors have commented on the topic of mandated reporting in cases of suspected child maltreatment and the application of this requirement to researchers. Most of these commentaries focus on the interpretation of current legal standards and offer opinions for or against the imposition of mandated reporting laws on research activities. Authors on both sides of the issue offer ethical arguments, although a direct comparison and analysis of these opposing arguments is rare. This article critically examines the ethical arguments made by authors on both sides of the debate. The conclusion is reached that researchers should be mandated reporters of child maltreatment because the current arguments do not justify their exclusion from current ethical and legal standards. The author makes recommendations for the ethically responsible conduct of research in regard to this topic and legal implications are discussed.

AB - A number of authors have commented on the topic of mandated reporting in cases of suspected child maltreatment and the application of this requirement to researchers. Most of these commentaries focus on the interpretation of current legal standards and offer opinions for or against the imposition of mandated reporting laws on research activities. Authors on both sides of the issue offer ethical arguments, although a direct comparison and analysis of these opposing arguments is rare. This article critically examines the ethical arguments made by authors on both sides of the debate. The conclusion is reached that researchers should be mandated reporters of child maltreatment because the current arguments do not justify their exclusion from current ethical and legal standards. The author makes recommendations for the ethically responsible conduct of research in regard to this topic and legal implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849100234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849100234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10508420802623641

DO - 10.1080/10508420802623641

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:60849100234

VL - 19

SP - 15

EP - 24

JO - Ethics and Behavior

JF - Ethics and Behavior

SN - 1050-8422

IS - 1

ER -