Are the “Customers” of Business Ethics Courses Satisfied? An Examination of One Source of Business Ethics Education Legitimacy

Scott J. Reynolds, Carolyn T. Dang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Though there are many factors that contribute to the perceived legitimacy of business ethics education, this research focuses on one factor that is given great attention both formally and informally in many business schools: student satisfaction with the course. To understand the nature of student satisfaction, the authors draw from multiple theories with central claims relating (met) expectations with satisfaction. The authors then compare student expectations of business ethics courses with instructor objectives and discover that business ethics courses are not necessarily designed to meet student expectations. The authors speculate that this general mismatch between student expectations and instructor objectives has material consequences. As one example, the authors analyze student evaluations from three business schools and identify a “business ethics course effect”: a negative association between business ethics courses and student evaluations. The authors discuss the implications for business ethics education of a situation where pedagogical objectives (“Educate!”) and market prescriptions (“Satisfy!”) point in different directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)947-974
Number of pages28
JournalBusiness and Society
Volume56
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

business ethics
legitimacy
customer
examination
education
student
business school
instructor
research focus
Business ethics
Legitimacy
Ethics education
mismatch
evaluation
medication
market

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{1759666567c84d9d8f34ea4850e588f9,
title = "Are the “Customers” of Business Ethics Courses Satisfied? An Examination of One Source of Business Ethics Education Legitimacy",
abstract = "Though there are many factors that contribute to the perceived legitimacy of business ethics education, this research focuses on one factor that is given great attention both formally and informally in many business schools: student satisfaction with the course. To understand the nature of student satisfaction, the authors draw from multiple theories with central claims relating (met) expectations with satisfaction. The authors then compare student expectations of business ethics courses with instructor objectives and discover that business ethics courses are not necessarily designed to meet student expectations. The authors speculate that this general mismatch between student expectations and instructor objectives has material consequences. As one example, the authors analyze student evaluations from three business schools and identify a “business ethics course effect”: a negative association between business ethics courses and student evaluations. The authors discuss the implications for business ethics education of a situation where pedagogical objectives (“Educate!”) and market prescriptions (“Satisfy!”) point in different directions.",
author = "Reynolds, {Scott J.} and Dang, {Carolyn T.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0007650315609265",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "947--974",
journal = "Business and Society",
issn = "0007-6503",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

Are the “Customers” of Business Ethics Courses Satisfied? An Examination of One Source of Business Ethics Education Legitimacy. / Reynolds, Scott J.; Dang, Carolyn T.

In: Business and Society, Vol. 56, No. 7, 01.09.2017, p. 947-974.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the “Customers” of Business Ethics Courses Satisfied? An Examination of One Source of Business Ethics Education Legitimacy

AU - Reynolds, Scott J.

AU - Dang, Carolyn T.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Though there are many factors that contribute to the perceived legitimacy of business ethics education, this research focuses on one factor that is given great attention both formally and informally in many business schools: student satisfaction with the course. To understand the nature of student satisfaction, the authors draw from multiple theories with central claims relating (met) expectations with satisfaction. The authors then compare student expectations of business ethics courses with instructor objectives and discover that business ethics courses are not necessarily designed to meet student expectations. The authors speculate that this general mismatch between student expectations and instructor objectives has material consequences. As one example, the authors analyze student evaluations from three business schools and identify a “business ethics course effect”: a negative association between business ethics courses and student evaluations. The authors discuss the implications for business ethics education of a situation where pedagogical objectives (“Educate!”) and market prescriptions (“Satisfy!”) point in different directions.

AB - Though there are many factors that contribute to the perceived legitimacy of business ethics education, this research focuses on one factor that is given great attention both formally and informally in many business schools: student satisfaction with the course. To understand the nature of student satisfaction, the authors draw from multiple theories with central claims relating (met) expectations with satisfaction. The authors then compare student expectations of business ethics courses with instructor objectives and discover that business ethics courses are not necessarily designed to meet student expectations. The authors speculate that this general mismatch between student expectations and instructor objectives has material consequences. As one example, the authors analyze student evaluations from three business schools and identify a “business ethics course effect”: a negative association between business ethics courses and student evaluations. The authors discuss the implications for business ethics education of a situation where pedagogical objectives (“Educate!”) and market prescriptions (“Satisfy!”) point in different directions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027572808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027572808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0007650315609265

DO - 10.1177/0007650315609265

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027572808

VL - 56

SP - 947

EP - 974

JO - Business and Society

JF - Business and Society

SN - 0007-6503

IS - 7

ER -