Arguing for the immortality of the soul in the palinode of the Phaedrus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that in his second speech of the Phaedrus (the "palinode"), Socrates gives an intentionally fallacious argument. He gives this argument, starting "all/every soul is immortal" (245c6-246a2), to show his speech-loving friend Phaedrus how-rather than simply to tell him that-analytic as much as imagistic speech can persuade without deserving conviction. This argument joins four others that recent Phaedrus scholarship has shown to be deliberately misconstructed. The entire dialogue has Socrates demonstrating to Phaedrus that the proper attitude to speech is active and critical scrutiny. "Philosophy"-toward which Socrates wants to turn Phaedrus-is not the rhetorical mode "speaking in sequential inferences" but is instead a kind of shared listening and conversation, an association committed to "making a person most thoughtful." Yet inducting someone into philosophy still depends on some rhetorical mode: the kind that reveals a person's need for a commitment to investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-208
Number of pages30
JournalPhilosophy and Rhetoric
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Immortality
Palinode
Socrates
Person
Rhetorical Modes
Philosophy
Conviction
Inference
Immortal
Scrutiny

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{a258cb534b9747728fec31e9d43353ed,
title = "Arguing for the immortality of the soul in the palinode of the Phaedrus",
abstract = "This article argues that in his second speech of the Phaedrus (the {"}palinode{"}), Socrates gives an intentionally fallacious argument. He gives this argument, starting {"}all/every soul is immortal{"} (245c6-246a2), to show his speech-loving friend Phaedrus how-rather than simply to tell him that-analytic as much as imagistic speech can persuade without deserving conviction. This argument joins four others that recent Phaedrus scholarship has shown to be deliberately misconstructed. The entire dialogue has Socrates demonstrating to Phaedrus that the proper attitude to speech is active and critical scrutiny. {"}Philosophy{"}-toward which Socrates wants to turn Phaedrus-is not the rhetorical mode {"}speaking in sequential inferences{"} but is instead a kind of shared listening and conversation, an association committed to {"}making a person most thoughtful.{"} Yet inducting someone into philosophy still depends on some rhetorical mode: the kind that reveals a person's need for a commitment to investigation.",
author = "Moore, {Christopher Robert}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/par.2014.0007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "179--208",
journal = "Philosophy and Rhetoric",
issn = "0031-8213",
publisher = "Penn State University Press",
number = "2",

}

Arguing for the immortality of the soul in the palinode of the Phaedrus. / Moore, Christopher Robert.

In: Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 179-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arguing for the immortality of the soul in the palinode of the Phaedrus

AU - Moore, Christopher Robert

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This article argues that in his second speech of the Phaedrus (the "palinode"), Socrates gives an intentionally fallacious argument. He gives this argument, starting "all/every soul is immortal" (245c6-246a2), to show his speech-loving friend Phaedrus how-rather than simply to tell him that-analytic as much as imagistic speech can persuade without deserving conviction. This argument joins four others that recent Phaedrus scholarship has shown to be deliberately misconstructed. The entire dialogue has Socrates demonstrating to Phaedrus that the proper attitude to speech is active and critical scrutiny. "Philosophy"-toward which Socrates wants to turn Phaedrus-is not the rhetorical mode "speaking in sequential inferences" but is instead a kind of shared listening and conversation, an association committed to "making a person most thoughtful." Yet inducting someone into philosophy still depends on some rhetorical mode: the kind that reveals a person's need for a commitment to investigation.

AB - This article argues that in his second speech of the Phaedrus (the "palinode"), Socrates gives an intentionally fallacious argument. He gives this argument, starting "all/every soul is immortal" (245c6-246a2), to show his speech-loving friend Phaedrus how-rather than simply to tell him that-analytic as much as imagistic speech can persuade without deserving conviction. This argument joins four others that recent Phaedrus scholarship has shown to be deliberately misconstructed. The entire dialogue has Socrates demonstrating to Phaedrus that the proper attitude to speech is active and critical scrutiny. "Philosophy"-toward which Socrates wants to turn Phaedrus-is not the rhetorical mode "speaking in sequential inferences" but is instead a kind of shared listening and conversation, an association committed to "making a person most thoughtful." Yet inducting someone into philosophy still depends on some rhetorical mode: the kind that reveals a person's need for a commitment to investigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901491721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901491721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/par.2014.0007

DO - 10.1353/par.2014.0007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901491721

VL - 47

SP - 179

EP - 208

JO - Philosophy and Rhetoric

JF - Philosophy and Rhetoric

SN - 0031-8213

IS - 2

ER -