Assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia: A systematic review of measures

Laura N. Gitlin, Katherine A. Marx, Ian H. Stanley, Bryan R. Hansen, Kimberly S. Van Haitsma

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) occur in people with dementia throughout disease course and across etiologies. NPS are associated with significant morbidities and hastened disease processes. Nevertheless, people with dementia are not systematically assessed for NPS in clinical settings. We review existing NPS measures for clinical and/or research purposes, and identify measurement gaps. Methods: We conducted a computerized search of peer-reviewed published studies of measures (January 1, 1980-December 1, 2013) using multiple search terms. Measures selected for review were in English, had adequate psychometric properties, and were developed for or used with people with dementia. Papers describing measures were evaluated by three coders along seven characteristics: behavioral domains, number of items, method of administration, response categories, targeted population, setting, and psychometric properties. Results: Overall, 2,233 papers were identified through search terms, and 36 papers from manual searches of references. From 2,269 papers, 85 measures were identified of which 45 (52.9%) had adequate psychometric properties and were developed or used with dementia populations. Of these, 16 (35.6%) were general measures that included a wide range of behaviors; 29 (64.4%) targeted specific behaviors (e.g. agitation). Measures differed widely as to behaviors assessed and measurement properties. Conclusions: A robust set of diverse measures exists for assessing NPS in different settings. No measures identify risk factors for behaviors or enable an evaluation of the context in which behaviors occur. To improve clinical efforts, research is needed to evaluate concordance of behavioral ratings between formal and informal caregivers, and to develop and test measures that can identify known risks for behaviors and the circumstances under which behaviors occur.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1805-1848
Number of pages44
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
Volume26
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2014

Fingerprint

Dementia
Psychometrics
Risk-Taking
Research
Caregivers
Population
Morbidity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Gitlin, Laura N. ; Marx, Katherine A. ; Stanley, Ian H. ; Hansen, Bryan R. ; Van Haitsma, Kimberly S. / Assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia : A systematic review of measures. In: International Psychogeriatrics. 2014 ; Vol. 26, No. 11. pp. 1805-1848.
@article{de65203b55db41418ea6902f3595ab90,
title = "Assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia: A systematic review of measures",
abstract = "Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) occur in people with dementia throughout disease course and across etiologies. NPS are associated with significant morbidities and hastened disease processes. Nevertheless, people with dementia are not systematically assessed for NPS in clinical settings. We review existing NPS measures for clinical and/or research purposes, and identify measurement gaps. Methods: We conducted a computerized search of peer-reviewed published studies of measures (January 1, 1980-December 1, 2013) using multiple search terms. Measures selected for review were in English, had adequate psychometric properties, and were developed for or used with people with dementia. Papers describing measures were evaluated by three coders along seven characteristics: behavioral domains, number of items, method of administration, response categories, targeted population, setting, and psychometric properties. Results: Overall, 2,233 papers were identified through search terms, and 36 papers from manual searches of references. From 2,269 papers, 85 measures were identified of which 45 (52.9{\%}) had adequate psychometric properties and were developed or used with dementia populations. Of these, 16 (35.6{\%}) were general measures that included a wide range of behaviors; 29 (64.4{\%}) targeted specific behaviors (e.g. agitation). Measures differed widely as to behaviors assessed and measurement properties. Conclusions: A robust set of diverse measures exists for assessing NPS in different settings. No measures identify risk factors for behaviors or enable an evaluation of the context in which behaviors occur. To improve clinical efforts, research is needed to evaluate concordance of behavioral ratings between formal and informal caregivers, and to develop and test measures that can identify known risks for behaviors and the circumstances under which behaviors occur.",
author = "Gitlin, {Laura N.} and Marx, {Katherine A.} and Stanley, {Ian H.} and Hansen, {Bryan R.} and {Van Haitsma}, {Kimberly S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610214001537",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1805--1848",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "11",

}

Assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia : A systematic review of measures. / Gitlin, Laura N.; Marx, Katherine A.; Stanley, Ian H.; Hansen, Bryan R.; Van Haitsma, Kimberly S.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 26, No. 11, 15.11.2014, p. 1805-1848.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia

T2 - A systematic review of measures

AU - Gitlin, Laura N.

AU - Marx, Katherine A.

AU - Stanley, Ian H.

AU - Hansen, Bryan R.

AU - Van Haitsma, Kimberly S.

PY - 2014/11/15

Y1 - 2014/11/15

N2 - Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) occur in people with dementia throughout disease course and across etiologies. NPS are associated with significant morbidities and hastened disease processes. Nevertheless, people with dementia are not systematically assessed for NPS in clinical settings. We review existing NPS measures for clinical and/or research purposes, and identify measurement gaps. Methods: We conducted a computerized search of peer-reviewed published studies of measures (January 1, 1980-December 1, 2013) using multiple search terms. Measures selected for review were in English, had adequate psychometric properties, and were developed for or used with people with dementia. Papers describing measures were evaluated by three coders along seven characteristics: behavioral domains, number of items, method of administration, response categories, targeted population, setting, and psychometric properties. Results: Overall, 2,233 papers were identified through search terms, and 36 papers from manual searches of references. From 2,269 papers, 85 measures were identified of which 45 (52.9%) had adequate psychometric properties and were developed or used with dementia populations. Of these, 16 (35.6%) were general measures that included a wide range of behaviors; 29 (64.4%) targeted specific behaviors (e.g. agitation). Measures differed widely as to behaviors assessed and measurement properties. Conclusions: A robust set of diverse measures exists for assessing NPS in different settings. No measures identify risk factors for behaviors or enable an evaluation of the context in which behaviors occur. To improve clinical efforts, research is needed to evaluate concordance of behavioral ratings between formal and informal caregivers, and to develop and test measures that can identify known risks for behaviors and the circumstances under which behaviors occur.

AB - Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) occur in people with dementia throughout disease course and across etiologies. NPS are associated with significant morbidities and hastened disease processes. Nevertheless, people with dementia are not systematically assessed for NPS in clinical settings. We review existing NPS measures for clinical and/or research purposes, and identify measurement gaps. Methods: We conducted a computerized search of peer-reviewed published studies of measures (January 1, 1980-December 1, 2013) using multiple search terms. Measures selected for review were in English, had adequate psychometric properties, and were developed for or used with people with dementia. Papers describing measures were evaluated by three coders along seven characteristics: behavioral domains, number of items, method of administration, response categories, targeted population, setting, and psychometric properties. Results: Overall, 2,233 papers were identified through search terms, and 36 papers from manual searches of references. From 2,269 papers, 85 measures were identified of which 45 (52.9%) had adequate psychometric properties and were developed or used with dementia populations. Of these, 16 (35.6%) were general measures that included a wide range of behaviors; 29 (64.4%) targeted specific behaviors (e.g. agitation). Measures differed widely as to behaviors assessed and measurement properties. Conclusions: A robust set of diverse measures exists for assessing NPS in different settings. No measures identify risk factors for behaviors or enable an evaluation of the context in which behaviors occur. To improve clinical efforts, research is needed to evaluate concordance of behavioral ratings between formal and informal caregivers, and to develop and test measures that can identify known risks for behaviors and the circumstances under which behaviors occur.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911433633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911433633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610214001537

DO - 10.1017/S1041610214001537

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25096416

AN - SCOPUS:84911433633

VL - 26

SP - 1805

EP - 1848

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

IS - 11

ER -