Assessing participatory processes and outcomes in agricultural research for development from participants' perspectives

Kristal Jones, Leland Luther Glenna, Eva Weltzien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To analyze the experiences of farmers involved in a participatory plant breeding project in West Africa, we develop a two-dimensional framework for evaluating the process and outcomes of participatory agricultural research for development projects. On one axis, we draw on existing typologies to describe the participatory process as consultative, collaborative, or collegial. On another axis, we theorize and test the outcomes of participation; specifically, whether the process achieves instrumental goals, is empowering for participants, or is manipulative toward participants. Qualitative interviews with farmers and technicians indicate a range of instrumental and empowering outcomes emerging from the participatory process, which support food security through access to seeds and a new ability to share information learned through the research process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume35
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

plant breeding
agricultural research
food security
typology
development project
seed
farmer
technician
West Africa
research process
qualitative interview
food
participation
test
project
ability
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{8ca92cbf89c849e19bb84f598d7f911f,
title = "Assessing participatory processes and outcomes in agricultural research for development from participants' perspectives",
abstract = "To analyze the experiences of farmers involved in a participatory plant breeding project in West Africa, we develop a two-dimensional framework for evaluating the process and outcomes of participatory agricultural research for development projects. On one axis, we draw on existing typologies to describe the participatory process as consultative, collaborative, or collegial. On another axis, we theorize and test the outcomes of participation; specifically, whether the process achieves instrumental goals, is empowering for participants, or is manipulative toward participants. Qualitative interviews with farmers and technicians indicate a range of instrumental and empowering outcomes emerging from the participatory process, which support food security through access to seeds and a new ability to share information learned through the research process.",
author = "Kristal Jones and Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Eva Weltzien",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Assessing participatory processes and outcomes in agricultural research for development from participants' perspectives. / Jones, Kristal; Glenna, Leland Luther; Weltzien, Eva.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 35, 01.01.2014, p. 91-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing participatory processes and outcomes in agricultural research for development from participants' perspectives

AU - Jones, Kristal

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Weltzien, Eva

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - To analyze the experiences of farmers involved in a participatory plant breeding project in West Africa, we develop a two-dimensional framework for evaluating the process and outcomes of participatory agricultural research for development projects. On one axis, we draw on existing typologies to describe the participatory process as consultative, collaborative, or collegial. On another axis, we theorize and test the outcomes of participation; specifically, whether the process achieves instrumental goals, is empowering for participants, or is manipulative toward participants. Qualitative interviews with farmers and technicians indicate a range of instrumental and empowering outcomes emerging from the participatory process, which support food security through access to seeds and a new ability to share information learned through the research process.

AB - To analyze the experiences of farmers involved in a participatory plant breeding project in West Africa, we develop a two-dimensional framework for evaluating the process and outcomes of participatory agricultural research for development projects. On one axis, we draw on existing typologies to describe the participatory process as consultative, collaborative, or collegial. On another axis, we theorize and test the outcomes of participation; specifically, whether the process achieves instrumental goals, is empowering for participants, or is manipulative toward participants. Qualitative interviews with farmers and technicians indicate a range of instrumental and empowering outcomes emerging from the participatory process, which support food security through access to seeds and a new ability to share information learned through the research process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900814890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900814890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.010

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -