Assessing the Explanatory Power of Social Movement Theories across the Life Course of the Civil Rights Movement

Thomas V. Maher, Andrew Martin, John David McCarthy, Lisa Moorhead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social movements are constantly evolving. Protest activity waxes and wanes as movements suffer through prolonged periods of frustration, win occasional gains, and turn to new goals and issues. While theoretical models of protest activity are often sensitive to this reality, empirical models typically treat these explanations as time-invariant, rather than situated in specific moments in movements’ histories. Quite simply, we suspect that the effect of important predictors of movement activity, notably access to resources, political opportunities, repression, and competition, varies depending on the specific moment in the movement’s life course. We explore this possibility through a detailed analysis of three main periods of the American Civil Rights movement: (1) the movement’s initial success (1960–1968), its subsequent demobilization (1968–1977), and its institutionalization (1978–1995). Our analysis builds on limited work arguing for greater sensitivity to a movement’s life course when explaining protest activity. We find that the type of organizational resources that shape mobilization varies across periods, and support for prior work showing that the concurrent push and pull of institutionalization and radicalization led to demobilization. Finally, we find that coalition work motivated protest during its period of institutionalization. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and empirical implications of these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)399-421
Number of pages23
JournalSocial Currents
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

civil rights movement
social movement
protest
institutionalization
demobilization
radicalization
repression
frustration
Social Movements
resources
mobilization
coalition
history

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{5cfac3f8902e4056b0cc95d2aae0271f,
title = "Assessing the Explanatory Power of Social Movement Theories across the Life Course of the Civil Rights Movement",
abstract = "Social movements are constantly evolving. Protest activity waxes and wanes as movements suffer through prolonged periods of frustration, win occasional gains, and turn to new goals and issues. While theoretical models of protest activity are often sensitive to this reality, empirical models typically treat these explanations as time-invariant, rather than situated in specific moments in movements’ histories. Quite simply, we suspect that the effect of important predictors of movement activity, notably access to resources, political opportunities, repression, and competition, varies depending on the specific moment in the movement’s life course. We explore this possibility through a detailed analysis of three main periods of the American Civil Rights movement: (1) the movement’s initial success (1960–1968), its subsequent demobilization (1968–1977), and its institutionalization (1978–1995). Our analysis builds on limited work arguing for greater sensitivity to a movement’s life course when explaining protest activity. We find that the type of organizational resources that shape mobilization varies across periods, and support for prior work showing that the concurrent push and pull of institutionalization and radicalization led to demobilization. Finally, we find that coalition work motivated protest during its period of institutionalization. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and empirical implications of these findings.",
author = "Maher, {Thomas V.} and Andrew Martin and McCarthy, {John David} and Lisa Moorhead",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2329496519850846",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "399--421",
journal = "Social Currents",
issn = "2329-4965",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "5",

}

Assessing the Explanatory Power of Social Movement Theories across the Life Course of the Civil Rights Movement. / Maher, Thomas V.; Martin, Andrew; McCarthy, John David; Moorhead, Lisa.

In: Social Currents, Vol. 6, No. 5, 01.10.2019, p. 399-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the Explanatory Power of Social Movement Theories across the Life Course of the Civil Rights Movement

AU - Maher, Thomas V.

AU - Martin, Andrew

AU - McCarthy, John David

AU - Moorhead, Lisa

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Social movements are constantly evolving. Protest activity waxes and wanes as movements suffer through prolonged periods of frustration, win occasional gains, and turn to new goals and issues. While theoretical models of protest activity are often sensitive to this reality, empirical models typically treat these explanations as time-invariant, rather than situated in specific moments in movements’ histories. Quite simply, we suspect that the effect of important predictors of movement activity, notably access to resources, political opportunities, repression, and competition, varies depending on the specific moment in the movement’s life course. We explore this possibility through a detailed analysis of three main periods of the American Civil Rights movement: (1) the movement’s initial success (1960–1968), its subsequent demobilization (1968–1977), and its institutionalization (1978–1995). Our analysis builds on limited work arguing for greater sensitivity to a movement’s life course when explaining protest activity. We find that the type of organizational resources that shape mobilization varies across periods, and support for prior work showing that the concurrent push and pull of institutionalization and radicalization led to demobilization. Finally, we find that coalition work motivated protest during its period of institutionalization. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and empirical implications of these findings.

AB - Social movements are constantly evolving. Protest activity waxes and wanes as movements suffer through prolonged periods of frustration, win occasional gains, and turn to new goals and issues. While theoretical models of protest activity are often sensitive to this reality, empirical models typically treat these explanations as time-invariant, rather than situated in specific moments in movements’ histories. Quite simply, we suspect that the effect of important predictors of movement activity, notably access to resources, political opportunities, repression, and competition, varies depending on the specific moment in the movement’s life course. We explore this possibility through a detailed analysis of three main periods of the American Civil Rights movement: (1) the movement’s initial success (1960–1968), its subsequent demobilization (1968–1977), and its institutionalization (1978–1995). Our analysis builds on limited work arguing for greater sensitivity to a movement’s life course when explaining protest activity. We find that the type of organizational resources that shape mobilization varies across periods, and support for prior work showing that the concurrent push and pull of institutionalization and radicalization led to demobilization. Finally, we find that coalition work motivated protest during its period of institutionalization. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and empirical implications of these findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071719100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071719100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2329496519850846

DO - 10.1177/2329496519850846

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071719100

VL - 6

SP - 399

EP - 421

JO - Social Currents

JF - Social Currents

SN - 2329-4965

IS - 5

ER -