@inproceedings{7d75ea6a0c6f4ddf9fc7f91bf100e3df,
title = "Assessing the quality of students{\textquoteright} arguments in yammer",
abstract = "In this poster, we discuss the analysis of students{\textquoteright} online posts for an introductory human-centered design course using a quality of argument coding scheme based on four criteria: 1) alternative claim or idea; 2) weighing of options; 3) use of evidence; and 4) professionalism. While almost all posts demonstrate professionalism (95.9%), few posts justified claims by weighing options (17.5%) or using fact-based evidence (2.1%). A minority of posts includes alternative claims or ideas (13.4%).",
author = "Ong, {Yann Shiou} and Marcela Borge",
note = "Funding Information: This project was supported by the National Science Foundation (IIS-1319445). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} ISLS; 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning, CSCL 2015 ; Conference date: 07-06-2015 Through 11-06-2015",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL",
publisher = "International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)",
pages = "675--676",
editor = "Oskar Lindwall and Paivi Hakkinen and Timothy Koschmann and Pierre Tchounikine and Sten Ludvigsen",
booktitle = "Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning",
}