Assessment of pre-operative psychosocial function among people receiving left ventricular assist devices: A national survey of US LVAD programs

Malachy J. Clancy, Amy B. Jessop, Howard Eisen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) includes assessment of four elements of psychosocial functioning prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation. Information about the practices and impact of assessments of psychosocial functioning are limited. Objective: To describe the psychosocial function assessment practices used within US LVAD programs and the influence of psychosocial assessment results on clinical decisions for LVAD patient selection. Methods: In 2017, a cross-sectional survey of LVAD programs listed in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) (N = 164) was conducted to understand practices used for and the influence of psychosocial assessments for post-operative care planning decisions. Results: Respondents included representatives of 69 LVAD programs from throughout the U.S. that implanted 64.8% of all U.S LVADs in 2016. More than 39 psychosocial screening instruments were used. Assessment of family, social and emotional support occurred most frequently (84.1% (n = 58) of programs assessed 100% of patients), but assessment was least likely to be conducted with standardized instruments (36.2%). Cognitive dysfunction was the least likely characteristic to be assessed (26.1% (n = 18) of programs assessed 100% of patients), but was most often conducted with standardized instruments (53.8% of programs). Twenty seven percent of programs used non-standardized instruments or patient observation. The influence of assessments on clinical decisions to implant an LVAD was most influential in the bridge to transplant pathway with 60% (n = 39) of respondents rating it very influential and least influential for patients in the destination therapy pathway with 39.4% (n = 26) of respondents. Conclusions: Current psychosocial assessment practices in LVAD programs vary widely and often yield non-standardized, non-comparable data that may lead to variations in care and limit generation of an evidence base for decision making regarding psychosocial eligibility for LVAD implantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)302-307
Number of pages6
JournalHeart and Lung
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Heart-Assist Devices
Lung Transplantation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Selection
Registries
Decision Making
Cross-Sectional Studies
Observation
Guidelines
Transplants

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{fdbee06bf7ba4a9c839935d75c3b54d9,
title = "Assessment of pre-operative psychosocial function among people receiving left ventricular assist devices: A national survey of US LVAD programs",
abstract = "Background: The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) includes assessment of four elements of psychosocial functioning prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation. Information about the practices and impact of assessments of psychosocial functioning are limited. Objective: To describe the psychosocial function assessment practices used within US LVAD programs and the influence of psychosocial assessment results on clinical decisions for LVAD patient selection. Methods: In 2017, a cross-sectional survey of LVAD programs listed in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) (N = 164) was conducted to understand practices used for and the influence of psychosocial assessments for post-operative care planning decisions. Results: Respondents included representatives of 69 LVAD programs from throughout the U.S. that implanted 64.8{\%} of all U.S LVADs in 2016. More than 39 psychosocial screening instruments were used. Assessment of family, social and emotional support occurred most frequently (84.1{\%} (n = 58) of programs assessed 100{\%} of patients), but assessment was least likely to be conducted with standardized instruments (36.2{\%}). Cognitive dysfunction was the least likely characteristic to be assessed (26.1{\%} (n = 18) of programs assessed 100{\%} of patients), but was most often conducted with standardized instruments (53.8{\%} of programs). Twenty seven percent of programs used non-standardized instruments or patient observation. The influence of assessments on clinical decisions to implant an LVAD was most influential in the bridge to transplant pathway with 60{\%} (n = 39) of respondents rating it very influential and least influential for patients in the destination therapy pathway with 39.4{\%} (n = 26) of respondents. Conclusions: Current psychosocial assessment practices in LVAD programs vary widely and often yield non-standardized, non-comparable data that may lead to variations in care and limit generation of an evidence base for decision making regarding psychosocial eligibility for LVAD implantation.",
author = "Clancy, {Malachy J.} and Jessop, {Amy B.} and Howard Eisen",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "302--307",
journal = "Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Assessment of pre-operative psychosocial function among people receiving left ventricular assist devices : A national survey of US LVAD programs. / Clancy, Malachy J.; Jessop, Amy B.; Eisen, Howard.

In: Heart and Lung, Vol. 48, No. 4, 01.07.2019, p. 302-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of pre-operative psychosocial function among people receiving left ventricular assist devices

T2 - A national survey of US LVAD programs

AU - Clancy, Malachy J.

AU - Jessop, Amy B.

AU - Eisen, Howard

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Background: The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) includes assessment of four elements of psychosocial functioning prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation. Information about the practices and impact of assessments of psychosocial functioning are limited. Objective: To describe the psychosocial function assessment practices used within US LVAD programs and the influence of psychosocial assessment results on clinical decisions for LVAD patient selection. Methods: In 2017, a cross-sectional survey of LVAD programs listed in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) (N = 164) was conducted to understand practices used for and the influence of psychosocial assessments for post-operative care planning decisions. Results: Respondents included representatives of 69 LVAD programs from throughout the U.S. that implanted 64.8% of all U.S LVADs in 2016. More than 39 psychosocial screening instruments were used. Assessment of family, social and emotional support occurred most frequently (84.1% (n = 58) of programs assessed 100% of patients), but assessment was least likely to be conducted with standardized instruments (36.2%). Cognitive dysfunction was the least likely characteristic to be assessed (26.1% (n = 18) of programs assessed 100% of patients), but was most often conducted with standardized instruments (53.8% of programs). Twenty seven percent of programs used non-standardized instruments or patient observation. The influence of assessments on clinical decisions to implant an LVAD was most influential in the bridge to transplant pathway with 60% (n = 39) of respondents rating it very influential and least influential for patients in the destination therapy pathway with 39.4% (n = 26) of respondents. Conclusions: Current psychosocial assessment practices in LVAD programs vary widely and often yield non-standardized, non-comparable data that may lead to variations in care and limit generation of an evidence base for decision making regarding psychosocial eligibility for LVAD implantation.

AB - Background: The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) includes assessment of four elements of psychosocial functioning prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation. Information about the practices and impact of assessments of psychosocial functioning are limited. Objective: To describe the psychosocial function assessment practices used within US LVAD programs and the influence of psychosocial assessment results on clinical decisions for LVAD patient selection. Methods: In 2017, a cross-sectional survey of LVAD programs listed in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) (N = 164) was conducted to understand practices used for and the influence of psychosocial assessments for post-operative care planning decisions. Results: Respondents included representatives of 69 LVAD programs from throughout the U.S. that implanted 64.8% of all U.S LVADs in 2016. More than 39 psychosocial screening instruments were used. Assessment of family, social and emotional support occurred most frequently (84.1% (n = 58) of programs assessed 100% of patients), but assessment was least likely to be conducted with standardized instruments (36.2%). Cognitive dysfunction was the least likely characteristic to be assessed (26.1% (n = 18) of programs assessed 100% of patients), but was most often conducted with standardized instruments (53.8% of programs). Twenty seven percent of programs used non-standardized instruments or patient observation. The influence of assessments on clinical decisions to implant an LVAD was most influential in the bridge to transplant pathway with 60% (n = 39) of respondents rating it very influential and least influential for patients in the destination therapy pathway with 39.4% (n = 26) of respondents. Conclusions: Current psychosocial assessment practices in LVAD programs vary widely and often yield non-standardized, non-comparable data that may lead to variations in care and limit generation of an evidence base for decision making regarding psychosocial eligibility for LVAD implantation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063188863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063188863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.02.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 30905390

AN - SCOPUS:85063188863

VL - 48

SP - 302

EP - 307

JO - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

JF - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

SN - 0147-9563

IS - 4

ER -