Assessment of students' oral communication skills

Do students and workplace supervisors rely on general response patterns?

Mieke Schuurman, Laura Pauley, Dennis Gouran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper reports a test of the hypothesis that students and supervisors rely on a general response pattern when assessing various aspects of oral communication skills. The study is a follow-up to our pilot conducted in 2006; both studies were partially funded by the Engineering Information Foundation. It is important to know whether students and supervisors evaluate each single aspect of oral communication skills individually or that they rely on a general answer pattern. This paper shows that supervisors do not seem to evaluate the various aspects but rather rely on their general impression of the students' oral communication abilities, while students distinguish between different aspects of oral communication skills when they evaluate their own skills. This is important information, because students will not be able to glean from the supervisors' assessments which aspects they will need to improve to become better communicators.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
    StatePublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Supervisory personnel
    Students
    Communication

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Engineering(all)

    Cite this

    @article{f4feed3071dd49479251d49b1942b3e6,
    title = "Assessment of students' oral communication skills: Do students and workplace supervisors rely on general response patterns?",
    abstract = "This paper reports a test of the hypothesis that students and supervisors rely on a general response pattern when assessing various aspects of oral communication skills. The study is a follow-up to our pilot conducted in 2006; both studies were partially funded by the Engineering Information Foundation. It is important to know whether students and supervisors evaluate each single aspect of oral communication skills individually or that they rely on a general answer pattern. This paper shows that supervisors do not seem to evaluate the various aspects but rather rely on their general impression of the students' oral communication abilities, while students distinguish between different aspects of oral communication skills when they evaluate their own skills. This is important information, because students will not be able to glean from the supervisors' assessments which aspects they will need to improve to become better communicators.",
    author = "Mieke Schuurman and Laura Pauley and Dennis Gouran",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings",
    issn = "2153-5965",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Assessment of students' oral communication skills

    T2 - Do students and workplace supervisors rely on general response patterns?

    AU - Schuurman, Mieke

    AU - Pauley, Laura

    AU - Gouran, Dennis

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - This paper reports a test of the hypothesis that students and supervisors rely on a general response pattern when assessing various aspects of oral communication skills. The study is a follow-up to our pilot conducted in 2006; both studies were partially funded by the Engineering Information Foundation. It is important to know whether students and supervisors evaluate each single aspect of oral communication skills individually or that they rely on a general answer pattern. This paper shows that supervisors do not seem to evaluate the various aspects but rather rely on their general impression of the students' oral communication abilities, while students distinguish between different aspects of oral communication skills when they evaluate their own skills. This is important information, because students will not be able to glean from the supervisors' assessments which aspects they will need to improve to become better communicators.

    AB - This paper reports a test of the hypothesis that students and supervisors rely on a general response pattern when assessing various aspects of oral communication skills. The study is a follow-up to our pilot conducted in 2006; both studies were partially funded by the Engineering Information Foundation. It is important to know whether students and supervisors evaluate each single aspect of oral communication skills individually or that they rely on a general answer pattern. This paper shows that supervisors do not seem to evaluate the various aspects but rather rely on their general impression of the students' oral communication abilities, while students distinguish between different aspects of oral communication skills when they evaluate their own skills. This is important information, because students will not be able to glean from the supervisors' assessments which aspects they will need to improve to become better communicators.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029079986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029079986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

    JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

    SN - 2153-5965

    ER -