Asset substitution and structured financing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article shows how structured financing can be used to solve the asset substitution problem in a dynamic setting. Structuring induces the firms owner to optimally choose the first best operating strategy even though the owners value function might be locally convex (concave), which would ordinarily lead to overinvestment (underinvestment) in risky projects. This result is demonstrated in two different continuous time settingsone that is based on the risk-shifting framework of Leland (1998) and one that generalizes the scaled return model of Green (1984). It is shown that the contractual nature of the structuring is a key determinant of the issuing firms dynamic asset volatility. Furthermore, unlike nonstructured financing, the default (conversion) probability of a structured debt security may be increasing (decreasing) in the firms total assets. Structured securities are therefore hedge assets, which potentially explains the popularity of structured securities among investors and third-party issuers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-951
Number of pages41
JournalJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2009

Fingerprint

Assets
Financing
Asset substitution
Owners
Continuous time
Debt
Value function
Overinvestment
Firm dynamics
Risk-shifting
Underinvestment
Investors
Hedge

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{7fa5176d664d4ad3a51fe54d6a6a2464,
title = "Asset substitution and structured financing",
abstract = "This article shows how structured financing can be used to solve the asset substitution problem in a dynamic setting. Structuring induces the firms owner to optimally choose the first best operating strategy even though the owners value function might be locally convex (concave), which would ordinarily lead to overinvestment (underinvestment) in risky projects. This result is demonstrated in two different continuous time settingsone that is based on the risk-shifting framework of Leland (1998) and one that generalizes the scaled return model of Green (1984). It is shown that the contractual nature of the structuring is a key determinant of the issuing firms dynamic asset volatility. Furthermore, unlike nonstructured financing, the default (conversion) probability of a structured debt security may be increasing (decreasing) in the firms total assets. Structured securities are therefore hedge assets, which potentially explains the popularity of structured securities among investors and third-party issuers.",
author = "Vanden, {Joel Matthew}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0022109009990226",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "911--951",
journal = "Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis",
issn = "0022-1090",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Asset substitution and structured financing. / Vanden, Joel Matthew.

In: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.08.2009, p. 911-951.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asset substitution and structured financing

AU - Vanden, Joel Matthew

PY - 2009/8/1

Y1 - 2009/8/1

N2 - This article shows how structured financing can be used to solve the asset substitution problem in a dynamic setting. Structuring induces the firms owner to optimally choose the first best operating strategy even though the owners value function might be locally convex (concave), which would ordinarily lead to overinvestment (underinvestment) in risky projects. This result is demonstrated in two different continuous time settingsone that is based on the risk-shifting framework of Leland (1998) and one that generalizes the scaled return model of Green (1984). It is shown that the contractual nature of the structuring is a key determinant of the issuing firms dynamic asset volatility. Furthermore, unlike nonstructured financing, the default (conversion) probability of a structured debt security may be increasing (decreasing) in the firms total assets. Structured securities are therefore hedge assets, which potentially explains the popularity of structured securities among investors and third-party issuers.

AB - This article shows how structured financing can be used to solve the asset substitution problem in a dynamic setting. Structuring induces the firms owner to optimally choose the first best operating strategy even though the owners value function might be locally convex (concave), which would ordinarily lead to overinvestment (underinvestment) in risky projects. This result is demonstrated in two different continuous time settingsone that is based on the risk-shifting framework of Leland (1998) and one that generalizes the scaled return model of Green (1984). It is shown that the contractual nature of the structuring is a key determinant of the issuing firms dynamic asset volatility. Furthermore, unlike nonstructured financing, the default (conversion) probability of a structured debt security may be increasing (decreasing) in the firms total assets. Structured securities are therefore hedge assets, which potentially explains the popularity of structured securities among investors and third-party issuers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77049124768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77049124768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022109009990226

DO - 10.1017/S0022109009990226

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77049124768

VL - 44

SP - 911

EP - 951

JO - Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis

JF - Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis

SN - 0022-1090

IS - 4

ER -