Associations between contextual factors and colorectal cancer screening in a racially and ethnically diverse population in Texas

William A. Calo, Sally W. Vernon, David R. Lairson, Stephen H. Linder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Increased attention has been given to understanding the role of local contexts on cancer screening behaviors. We examined the associations between multiple tract-level socioeconomic measures and adherence to colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional multilevel study linking individual-level data on CRCS from the 2010 Health of Houston Survey with contextual data from the U.S. Census and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We examined tract-level poverty, education, employment, income inequality, and foreclosure measures across 543 Census tracts. Analyses were limited to individuals aged 50-74 years (N=1720). Results: Overall, 58.0% of the sample was adherent to any recommended CRCS test. In bivariate analyses, increasing levels of area poverty, low education, unemployment, and foreclosures were associated with lower odds of adherence to CRCS. After controlling for individual-level covariates, only tract-level unemployment remained associated with adherence to CRCS (adjusted OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99; P=.037). Conclusions: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is increasingly recognized as a determinant of health, and our study suggests that the contextual effect of area unemployment may extend to cancer screening outcomes. Our finding is important to cancer control planners because we identified a contextual marker of disparity that can be used to target local interventions to promote CRCS and thereby reduce cancer disparities among non-adherent individuals who reside in communities with high unemployment rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)798-804
Number of pages7
JournalCancer Epidemiology
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Unemployment
Population
Censuses
Neoplasms
Urban Renewal
Poverty Areas
Education
Poverty
Health Surveys
Cause of Death
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

@article{81a96b0542504abda8863e1c529ff999,
title = "Associations between contextual factors and colorectal cancer screening in a racially and ethnically diverse population in Texas",
abstract = "Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Increased attention has been given to understanding the role of local contexts on cancer screening behaviors. We examined the associations between multiple tract-level socioeconomic measures and adherence to colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional multilevel study linking individual-level data on CRCS from the 2010 Health of Houston Survey with contextual data from the U.S. Census and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We examined tract-level poverty, education, employment, income inequality, and foreclosure measures across 543 Census tracts. Analyses were limited to individuals aged 50-74 years (N=1720). Results: Overall, 58.0{\%} of the sample was adherent to any recommended CRCS test. In bivariate analyses, increasing levels of area poverty, low education, unemployment, and foreclosures were associated with lower odds of adherence to CRCS. After controlling for individual-level covariates, only tract-level unemployment remained associated with adherence to CRCS (adjusted OR = 0.80; 95{\%} CI: 0.66-0.99; P=.037). Conclusions: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is increasingly recognized as a determinant of health, and our study suggests that the contextual effect of area unemployment may extend to cancer screening outcomes. Our finding is important to cancer control planners because we identified a contextual marker of disparity that can be used to target local interventions to promote CRCS and thereby reduce cancer disparities among non-adherent individuals who reside in communities with high unemployment rates.",
author = "Calo, {William A.} and Vernon, {Sally W.} and Lairson, {David R.} and Linder, {Stephen H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.canep.2015.09.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "798--804",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology",
issn = "1877-7821",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

Associations between contextual factors and colorectal cancer screening in a racially and ethnically diverse population in Texas. / Calo, William A.; Vernon, Sally W.; Lairson, David R.; Linder, Stephen H.

In: Cancer Epidemiology, Vol. 39, No. 6, 01.12.2015, p. 798-804.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Associations between contextual factors and colorectal cancer screening in a racially and ethnically diverse population in Texas

AU - Calo, William A.

AU - Vernon, Sally W.

AU - Lairson, David R.

AU - Linder, Stephen H.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Increased attention has been given to understanding the role of local contexts on cancer screening behaviors. We examined the associations between multiple tract-level socioeconomic measures and adherence to colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional multilevel study linking individual-level data on CRCS from the 2010 Health of Houston Survey with contextual data from the U.S. Census and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We examined tract-level poverty, education, employment, income inequality, and foreclosure measures across 543 Census tracts. Analyses were limited to individuals aged 50-74 years (N=1720). Results: Overall, 58.0% of the sample was adherent to any recommended CRCS test. In bivariate analyses, increasing levels of area poverty, low education, unemployment, and foreclosures were associated with lower odds of adherence to CRCS. After controlling for individual-level covariates, only tract-level unemployment remained associated with adherence to CRCS (adjusted OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99; P=.037). Conclusions: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is increasingly recognized as a determinant of health, and our study suggests that the contextual effect of area unemployment may extend to cancer screening outcomes. Our finding is important to cancer control planners because we identified a contextual marker of disparity that can be used to target local interventions to promote CRCS and thereby reduce cancer disparities among non-adherent individuals who reside in communities with high unemployment rates.

AB - Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Increased attention has been given to understanding the role of local contexts on cancer screening behaviors. We examined the associations between multiple tract-level socioeconomic measures and adherence to colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional multilevel study linking individual-level data on CRCS from the 2010 Health of Houston Survey with contextual data from the U.S. Census and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We examined tract-level poverty, education, employment, income inequality, and foreclosure measures across 543 Census tracts. Analyses were limited to individuals aged 50-74 years (N=1720). Results: Overall, 58.0% of the sample was adherent to any recommended CRCS test. In bivariate analyses, increasing levels of area poverty, low education, unemployment, and foreclosures were associated with lower odds of adherence to CRCS. After controlling for individual-level covariates, only tract-level unemployment remained associated with adherence to CRCS (adjusted OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99; P=.037). Conclusions: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is increasingly recognized as a determinant of health, and our study suggests that the contextual effect of area unemployment may extend to cancer screening outcomes. Our finding is important to cancer control planners because we identified a contextual marker of disparity that can be used to target local interventions to promote CRCS and thereby reduce cancer disparities among non-adherent individuals who reside in communities with high unemployment rates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949752773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949752773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.canep.2015.09.012

DO - 10.1016/j.canep.2015.09.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 26651438

AN - SCOPUS:84949752773

VL - 39

SP - 798

EP - 804

JO - Cancer Epidemiology

JF - Cancer Epidemiology

SN - 1877-7821

IS - 6

ER -