Asymptomatic Renal Stones—to Treat or Not to Treat

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of Review: There are no current guidelines on the optimal management of asymptomatic renal stones. This review summarizes the current literature, focusing on more recent studies that have been done to grow the body of evidence on this topic. Recent Findings: Recent studies have found that stone size is a significant predictor of need for future surgical intervention, with > 7 mm for pediatric population and > 4 mm for residual fragments after both PNL and ureteroscopy (URS). The role of URS has been better defined with a recent RCT concluding that URS and SWL had comparable outcomes for an asymptomatic lower pole stone < 1 cm. Summary: The treatment decision for asymptomatic renal stones should take into consideration a variety of relevant patient and stone factors; however, ultimately, a shared decision-making approach should be used. In the properly counseled patient, active surveillance or prophylactic surgical intervention may be appropriate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number29
JournalCurrent urology reports
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Kidney
Decision Making
Guidelines
Pediatrics
Population
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{f9d12701fe9e467cb46cb94121cfe866,
title = "Asymptomatic Renal Stones—to Treat or Not to Treat",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: There are no current guidelines on the optimal management of asymptomatic renal stones. This review summarizes the current literature, focusing on more recent studies that have been done to grow the body of evidence on this topic. Recent Findings: Recent studies have found that stone size is a significant predictor of need for future surgical intervention, with > 7 mm for pediatric population and > 4 mm for residual fragments after both PNL and ureteroscopy (URS). The role of URS has been better defined with a recent RCT concluding that URS and SWL had comparable outcomes for an asymptomatic lower pole stone < 1 cm. Summary: The treatment decision for asymptomatic renal stones should take into consideration a variety of relevant patient and stone factors; however, ultimately, a shared decision-making approach should be used. In the properly counseled patient, active surveillance or prophylactic surgical intervention may be appropriate.",
author = "Necole Streeper",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11934-018-0782-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Current Urology Reports",
issn = "1527-2737",
publisher = "Current Science, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Asymptomatic Renal Stones—to Treat or Not to Treat. / Streeper, Necole.

In: Current urology reports, Vol. 19, No. 5, 29, 01.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asymptomatic Renal Stones—to Treat or Not to Treat

AU - Streeper, Necole

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Purpose of Review: There are no current guidelines on the optimal management of asymptomatic renal stones. This review summarizes the current literature, focusing on more recent studies that have been done to grow the body of evidence on this topic. Recent Findings: Recent studies have found that stone size is a significant predictor of need for future surgical intervention, with > 7 mm for pediatric population and > 4 mm for residual fragments after both PNL and ureteroscopy (URS). The role of URS has been better defined with a recent RCT concluding that URS and SWL had comparable outcomes for an asymptomatic lower pole stone < 1 cm. Summary: The treatment decision for asymptomatic renal stones should take into consideration a variety of relevant patient and stone factors; however, ultimately, a shared decision-making approach should be used. In the properly counseled patient, active surveillance or prophylactic surgical intervention may be appropriate.

AB - Purpose of Review: There are no current guidelines on the optimal management of asymptomatic renal stones. This review summarizes the current literature, focusing on more recent studies that have been done to grow the body of evidence on this topic. Recent Findings: Recent studies have found that stone size is a significant predictor of need for future surgical intervention, with > 7 mm for pediatric population and > 4 mm for residual fragments after both PNL and ureteroscopy (URS). The role of URS has been better defined with a recent RCT concluding that URS and SWL had comparable outcomes for an asymptomatic lower pole stone < 1 cm. Summary: The treatment decision for asymptomatic renal stones should take into consideration a variety of relevant patient and stone factors; however, ultimately, a shared decision-making approach should be used. In the properly counseled patient, active surveillance or prophylactic surgical intervention may be appropriate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044220296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044220296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11934-018-0782-3

DO - 10.1007/s11934-018-0782-3

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29550897

AN - SCOPUS:85044220296

VL - 19

JO - Current Urology Reports

JF - Current Urology Reports

SN - 1527-2737

IS - 5

M1 - 29

ER -