Attachment and mentalization in female patients with comorbid narcissistic and borderline personality disorder

Diana Diamond, John F. Clarkin, Nicole M. Cain, Susanne Hörz, Kenneth N. Levy, Melitta Fischer-Kern, Stephan Doering, Anna Buchheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated attachment representations and the capacity for mentalization in a sample of adult female borderline patients with and without comorbid narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Participants were 22 borderline patients diagnosed with comorbid NPD (NPD/BPD) and 129 BPD patients without NPD (BPD) from 2 randomized clinical trials. Attachment and mentalization were assessed on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996). Results showed that as expected, compared with the BPD group, the NPD/BPD group was significantly more likely to be categorized as either dismissing or cannot classify on the AAI, whereas the BPD group was more likely to be classified as either preoccupied or unresolved for loss and abuse than was the NPD/BPD group. Both groups of patients scored low on mentalizing, and there were no significant differences between the groups, indicating that both NPD/BPD and BPD individuals showed deficits in this capacity. The clinical implications of the group differences in AAI classification are discussed with a focus on how understanding the attachment representations of NPD/BPD patients helps to illuminate their complex, contradictory mental states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)428-433
Number of pages6
JournalPersonality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Borderline Personality Disorder
Personality Disorders
Theory of Mind
Randomized Controlled Trials
Interviews

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Diamond, Diana ; Clarkin, John F. ; Cain, Nicole M. ; Hörz, Susanne ; Levy, Kenneth N. ; Fischer-Kern, Melitta ; Doering, Stephan ; Buchheim, Anna. / Attachment and mentalization in female patients with comorbid narcissistic and borderline personality disorder. In: Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 428-433.
@article{47f71bd850f044739a1211c628c076c2,
title = "Attachment and mentalization in female patients with comorbid narcissistic and borderline personality disorder",
abstract = "We investigated attachment representations and the capacity for mentalization in a sample of adult female borderline patients with and without comorbid narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Participants were 22 borderline patients diagnosed with comorbid NPD (NPD/BPD) and 129 BPD patients without NPD (BPD) from 2 randomized clinical trials. Attachment and mentalization were assessed on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996). Results showed that as expected, compared with the BPD group, the NPD/BPD group was significantly more likely to be categorized as either dismissing or cannot classify on the AAI, whereas the BPD group was more likely to be classified as either preoccupied or unresolved for loss and abuse than was the NPD/BPD group. Both groups of patients scored low on mentalizing, and there were no significant differences between the groups, indicating that both NPD/BPD and BPD individuals showed deficits in this capacity. The clinical implications of the group differences in AAI classification are discussed with a focus on how understanding the attachment representations of NPD/BPD patients helps to illuminate their complex, contradictory mental states.",
author = "Diana Diamond and Clarkin, {John F.} and Cain, {Nicole M.} and Susanne H{\"o}rz and Levy, {Kenneth N.} and Melitta Fischer-Kern and Stephan Doering and Anna Buchheim",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/per0000065",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "428--433",
journal = "Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment",
issn = "1949-2715",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Attachment and mentalization in female patients with comorbid narcissistic and borderline personality disorder. / Diamond, Diana; Clarkin, John F.; Cain, Nicole M.; Hörz, Susanne; Levy, Kenneth N.; Fischer-Kern, Melitta; Doering, Stephan; Buchheim, Anna.

In: Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, Vol. 5, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 428-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attachment and mentalization in female patients with comorbid narcissistic and borderline personality disorder

AU - Diamond, Diana

AU - Clarkin, John F.

AU - Cain, Nicole M.

AU - Hörz, Susanne

AU - Levy, Kenneth N.

AU - Fischer-Kern, Melitta

AU - Doering, Stephan

AU - Buchheim, Anna

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - We investigated attachment representations and the capacity for mentalization in a sample of adult female borderline patients with and without comorbid narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Participants were 22 borderline patients diagnosed with comorbid NPD (NPD/BPD) and 129 BPD patients without NPD (BPD) from 2 randomized clinical trials. Attachment and mentalization were assessed on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996). Results showed that as expected, compared with the BPD group, the NPD/BPD group was significantly more likely to be categorized as either dismissing or cannot classify on the AAI, whereas the BPD group was more likely to be classified as either preoccupied or unresolved for loss and abuse than was the NPD/BPD group. Both groups of patients scored low on mentalizing, and there were no significant differences between the groups, indicating that both NPD/BPD and BPD individuals showed deficits in this capacity. The clinical implications of the group differences in AAI classification are discussed with a focus on how understanding the attachment representations of NPD/BPD patients helps to illuminate their complex, contradictory mental states.

AB - We investigated attachment representations and the capacity for mentalization in a sample of adult female borderline patients with and without comorbid narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Participants were 22 borderline patients diagnosed with comorbid NPD (NPD/BPD) and 129 BPD patients without NPD (BPD) from 2 randomized clinical trials. Attachment and mentalization were assessed on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996). Results showed that as expected, compared with the BPD group, the NPD/BPD group was significantly more likely to be categorized as either dismissing or cannot classify on the AAI, whereas the BPD group was more likely to be classified as either preoccupied or unresolved for loss and abuse than was the NPD/BPD group. Both groups of patients scored low on mentalizing, and there were no significant differences between the groups, indicating that both NPD/BPD and BPD individuals showed deficits in this capacity. The clinical implications of the group differences in AAI classification are discussed with a focus on how understanding the attachment representations of NPD/BPD patients helps to illuminate their complex, contradictory mental states.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928593870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928593870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/per0000065

DO - 10.1037/per0000065

M3 - Article

C2 - 25314231

AN - SCOPUS:84928593870

VL - 5

SP - 428

EP - 433

JO - Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

JF - Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

SN - 1949-2715

IS - 4

ER -