Attitudes and labeling biases toward behavior modification: The effects of labels, content, and jargon

Alan E. Kazdin, Pamela Marie Cole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that the label "behavior modification" results in negative evaluations of treatment. Three experiments were conducted to separate the impact of the label, content, and manner of presenting treatment on evaluations of behavior modification. In each experiment, undergraduate students rated treatments designed to alter classroom behavior. Experiment 1 examined the effects of labels (behavior modification, humanistic education, and a new teaching method) and content (behavioral, humanistic, and neutral conditions). Experiment 2 evaluated the effects of content (behavioral versus neutral methods) and the manner in which they were described (in scientific jargon versus ordinary language). Experiment 3 examined the impact of labels (behavior modification versus no label) and the manner in which behavioral methods were presented (jargon versus ordinary language). Content of the method consistently contributed to negative evaluations. Behavior modification was evaluated less favorably than were humanistic or neutral procedures. Labeling of treatment as "behavior modification" failed to contribute to the evaluations of the procedures. Interestingly, presenting behavioral treatments in jargon rather than in ordinary language was associated with more positive evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-68
Number of pages13
JournalBehavior Therapy
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

Fingerprint

Behavior Therapy
Language
Therapeutics
Teaching
Students
Education
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{e02a47986e0e40cfa0069bb20e3e2fb3,
title = "Attitudes and labeling biases toward behavior modification: The effects of labels, content, and jargon",
abstract = "Previous research has suggested that the label {"}behavior modification{"} results in negative evaluations of treatment. Three experiments were conducted to separate the impact of the label, content, and manner of presenting treatment on evaluations of behavior modification. In each experiment, undergraduate students rated treatments designed to alter classroom behavior. Experiment 1 examined the effects of labels (behavior modification, humanistic education, and a new teaching method) and content (behavioral, humanistic, and neutral conditions). Experiment 2 evaluated the effects of content (behavioral versus neutral methods) and the manner in which they were described (in scientific jargon versus ordinary language). Experiment 3 examined the impact of labels (behavior modification versus no label) and the manner in which behavioral methods were presented (jargon versus ordinary language). Content of the method consistently contributed to negative evaluations. Behavior modification was evaluated less favorably than were humanistic or neutral procedures. Labeling of treatment as {"}behavior modification{"} failed to contribute to the evaluations of the procedures. Interestingly, presenting behavioral treatments in jargon rather than in ordinary language was associated with more positive evaluations.",
author = "Kazdin, {Alan E.} and Cole, {Pamela Marie}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80106-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "56--68",
journal = "Behavior Therapy",
issn = "0005-7894",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Attitudes and labeling biases toward behavior modification : The effects of labels, content, and jargon. / Kazdin, Alan E.; Cole, Pamela Marie.

In: Behavior Therapy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.1981, p. 56-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes and labeling biases toward behavior modification

T2 - The effects of labels, content, and jargon

AU - Kazdin, Alan E.

AU - Cole, Pamela Marie

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - Previous research has suggested that the label "behavior modification" results in negative evaluations of treatment. Three experiments were conducted to separate the impact of the label, content, and manner of presenting treatment on evaluations of behavior modification. In each experiment, undergraduate students rated treatments designed to alter classroom behavior. Experiment 1 examined the effects of labels (behavior modification, humanistic education, and a new teaching method) and content (behavioral, humanistic, and neutral conditions). Experiment 2 evaluated the effects of content (behavioral versus neutral methods) and the manner in which they were described (in scientific jargon versus ordinary language). Experiment 3 examined the impact of labels (behavior modification versus no label) and the manner in which behavioral methods were presented (jargon versus ordinary language). Content of the method consistently contributed to negative evaluations. Behavior modification was evaluated less favorably than were humanistic or neutral procedures. Labeling of treatment as "behavior modification" failed to contribute to the evaluations of the procedures. Interestingly, presenting behavioral treatments in jargon rather than in ordinary language was associated with more positive evaluations.

AB - Previous research has suggested that the label "behavior modification" results in negative evaluations of treatment. Three experiments were conducted to separate the impact of the label, content, and manner of presenting treatment on evaluations of behavior modification. In each experiment, undergraduate students rated treatments designed to alter classroom behavior. Experiment 1 examined the effects of labels (behavior modification, humanistic education, and a new teaching method) and content (behavioral, humanistic, and neutral conditions). Experiment 2 evaluated the effects of content (behavioral versus neutral methods) and the manner in which they were described (in scientific jargon versus ordinary language). Experiment 3 examined the impact of labels (behavior modification versus no label) and the manner in which behavioral methods were presented (jargon versus ordinary language). Content of the method consistently contributed to negative evaluations. Behavior modification was evaluated less favorably than were humanistic or neutral procedures. Labeling of treatment as "behavior modification" failed to contribute to the evaluations of the procedures. Interestingly, presenting behavioral treatments in jargon rather than in ordinary language was associated with more positive evaluations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019431519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019431519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80106-2

DO - 10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80106-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0019431519

VL - 12

SP - 56

EP - 68

JO - Behavior Therapy

JF - Behavior Therapy

SN - 0005-7894

IS - 1

ER -