Audience costs and interstate crises: An empirical assessment of fearon's model of dispute outcomes

Peter J. Partell, Glenn Hunter Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent article, James Fearon advances an innovative approach to the study of interstate crises. He adds to the traditional view (that crisis outcomes are influenced by the balance of capability and the balance of resolve) the notion that domestic political audiences exert a strong influence over which state in a crisis is likely to achieve a successful outcome. His game-theoretic analysis yields a number of interesting hypotheses, which are tested in this study using data on militarized disputes, the structure of polities, and national capability. In general the results strongly support Fearon's model, though we find that relative national capabilities do tend to affect the outcomes of crises. This study highlights the importance of combining formal models of political events with large-N empirical tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-405
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

costs
event

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{05618d16adfd4a7f843460af9e345dbb,
title = "Audience costs and interstate crises: An empirical assessment of fearon's model of dispute outcomes",
abstract = "In a recent article, James Fearon advances an innovative approach to the study of interstate crises. He adds to the traditional view (that crisis outcomes are influenced by the balance of capability and the balance of resolve) the notion that domestic political audiences exert a strong influence over which state in a crisis is likely to achieve a successful outcome. His game-theoretic analysis yields a number of interesting hypotheses, which are tested in this study using data on militarized disputes, the structure of polities, and national capability. In general the results strongly support Fearon's model, though we find that relative national capabilities do tend to affect the outcomes of crises. This study highlights the importance of combining formal models of political events with large-N empirical tests.",
author = "Partell, {Peter J.} and Palmer, {Glenn Hunter}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/0020-8833.00125",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "389--405",
journal = "International Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0020-8833",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Audience costs and interstate crises : An empirical assessment of fearon's model of dispute outcomes. / Partell, Peter J.; Palmer, Glenn Hunter.

In: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.01.1999, p. 389-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Audience costs and interstate crises

T2 - An empirical assessment of fearon's model of dispute outcomes

AU - Partell, Peter J.

AU - Palmer, Glenn Hunter

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - In a recent article, James Fearon advances an innovative approach to the study of interstate crises. He adds to the traditional view (that crisis outcomes are influenced by the balance of capability and the balance of resolve) the notion that domestic political audiences exert a strong influence over which state in a crisis is likely to achieve a successful outcome. His game-theoretic analysis yields a number of interesting hypotheses, which are tested in this study using data on militarized disputes, the structure of polities, and national capability. In general the results strongly support Fearon's model, though we find that relative national capabilities do tend to affect the outcomes of crises. This study highlights the importance of combining formal models of political events with large-N empirical tests.

AB - In a recent article, James Fearon advances an innovative approach to the study of interstate crises. He adds to the traditional view (that crisis outcomes are influenced by the balance of capability and the balance of resolve) the notion that domestic political audiences exert a strong influence over which state in a crisis is likely to achieve a successful outcome. His game-theoretic analysis yields a number of interesting hypotheses, which are tested in this study using data on militarized disputes, the structure of polities, and national capability. In general the results strongly support Fearon's model, though we find that relative national capabilities do tend to affect the outcomes of crises. This study highlights the importance of combining formal models of political events with large-N empirical tests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000888597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000888597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/0020-8833.00125

DO - 10.1111/0020-8833.00125

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000888597

VL - 43

SP - 389

EP - 405

JO - International Studies Quarterly

JF - International Studies Quarterly

SN - 0020-8833

IS - 2

ER -