Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: Myth or reality?

Hoi K. Suen, Donald Ary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on a reanalysis of 881 studies in applied behavior analysis, Huitema (1985 Behavioral Assessment7, 107-118) concluded that behavioral data are not autocorrelated. This conclusion was challenged by Suen (in press Behavioral Assessment) from a number of methodological perspectives. One of the most essential criticisms was the inherent high probability of Type II error in Huitema's conclusion. In this paper, the common power analysis method is modified and is suggested as a means to assess the appropriateness of a "no autocorrelation" conclusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-130
Number of pages6
JournalBehavioral Assessment
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 1987

Fingerprint

Applied Behavior Analysis
Power (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Suen, Hoi K. ; Ary, Donald. / Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis : Myth or reality?. In: Behavioral Assessment. 1987 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 125-130.
@article{b7448e5ff01c463e97cadec9a3d64da8,
title = "Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: Myth or reality?",
abstract = "Based on a reanalysis of 881 studies in applied behavior analysis, Huitema (1985 Behavioral Assessment7, 107-118) concluded that behavioral data are not autocorrelated. This conclusion was challenged by Suen (in press Behavioral Assessment) from a number of methodological perspectives. One of the most essential criticisms was the inherent high probability of Type II error in Huitema's conclusion. In this paper, the common power analysis method is modified and is suggested as a means to assess the appropriateness of a {"}no autocorrelation{"} conclusion.",
author = "Suen, {Hoi K.} and Donald Ary",
year = "1987",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "125--130",
journal = "Behaviour Research and Therapy",
issn = "0005-7967",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

Suen, HK & Ary, D 1987, 'Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: Myth or reality?', Behavioral Assessment, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 125-130.

Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis : Myth or reality? / Suen, Hoi K.; Ary, Donald.

In: Behavioral Assessment, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.03.1987, p. 125-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis

T2 - Myth or reality?

AU - Suen, Hoi K.

AU - Ary, Donald

PY - 1987/3/1

Y1 - 1987/3/1

N2 - Based on a reanalysis of 881 studies in applied behavior analysis, Huitema (1985 Behavioral Assessment7, 107-118) concluded that behavioral data are not autocorrelated. This conclusion was challenged by Suen (in press Behavioral Assessment) from a number of methodological perspectives. One of the most essential criticisms was the inherent high probability of Type II error in Huitema's conclusion. In this paper, the common power analysis method is modified and is suggested as a means to assess the appropriateness of a "no autocorrelation" conclusion.

AB - Based on a reanalysis of 881 studies in applied behavior analysis, Huitema (1985 Behavioral Assessment7, 107-118) concluded that behavioral data are not autocorrelated. This conclusion was challenged by Suen (in press Behavioral Assessment) from a number of methodological perspectives. One of the most essential criticisms was the inherent high probability of Type II error in Huitema's conclusion. In this paper, the common power analysis method is modified and is suggested as a means to assess the appropriateness of a "no autocorrelation" conclusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346360978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346360978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0346360978

VL - 9

SP - 125

EP - 130

JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy

JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy

SN - 0005-7967

IS - 2

ER -