Automated biopsy devices: A blinded evaluation

K. D. Hopper, Catherine Abendroth, K. W. Sturtz, Y. L. Matthews, L. A. Stevens, S. J. Shirk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate 20 different automated biopsy devices with respect to the quality of tissue obtained for histopathologic analysis, a total of 1,470 18- gauge biopsy specimens were obtained from 10 fresh autopsy cases, including 30 liver, 20 kidney, 10 pancreas, and 10 psoas muscle biopsy specimens per device and per biopsy depth. There was no statistical difference in the performance of the long-throw Biopty, ASAP 18, 1.9-cm UltraCut, long-throw Monopty, and 2.5-cm ABS biopsy guns. All obtained a large amount of tissue with minimal fragmentation or crush artifact. Most of the short-throw biopsy guns (depth of biopsy ≤ 1.1 cm) did not perform as well. Although the other guns performed adequately, less than optimal results were obtained with the Temno, Bio-Gun, Roth, Klear Kut, ABC, and Urocut biopsy guns. Most 18-gauge automated biopsy devices with a biopsy excursion of at least 2.0 cm provide a high-quality, diagnostically adequate specimen for histopathologic analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)653-660
Number of pages8
JournalRadiology
Volume187
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Biopsy
Equipment and Supplies
Firearms
Psoas Muscles
Artifacts
Pancreas
Autopsy
Kidney
Liver

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Hopper, K. D., Abendroth, C., Sturtz, K. W., Matthews, Y. L., Stevens, L. A., & Shirk, S. J. (1993). Automated biopsy devices: A blinded evaluation. Radiology, 187(3), 653-660. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497611
Hopper, K. D. ; Abendroth, Catherine ; Sturtz, K. W. ; Matthews, Y. L. ; Stevens, L. A. ; Shirk, S. J. / Automated biopsy devices : A blinded evaluation. In: Radiology. 1993 ; Vol. 187, No. 3. pp. 653-660.
@article{506b672badab4dd78b05cf72638750a1,
title = "Automated biopsy devices: A blinded evaluation",
abstract = "To evaluate 20 different automated biopsy devices with respect to the quality of tissue obtained for histopathologic analysis, a total of 1,470 18- gauge biopsy specimens were obtained from 10 fresh autopsy cases, including 30 liver, 20 kidney, 10 pancreas, and 10 psoas muscle biopsy specimens per device and per biopsy depth. There was no statistical difference in the performance of the long-throw Biopty, ASAP 18, 1.9-cm UltraCut, long-throw Monopty, and 2.5-cm ABS biopsy guns. All obtained a large amount of tissue with minimal fragmentation or crush artifact. Most of the short-throw biopsy guns (depth of biopsy ≤ 1.1 cm) did not perform as well. Although the other guns performed adequately, less than optimal results were obtained with the Temno, Bio-Gun, Roth, Klear Kut, ABC, and Urocut biopsy guns. Most 18-gauge automated biopsy devices with a biopsy excursion of at least 2.0 cm provide a high-quality, diagnostically adequate specimen for histopathologic analysis.",
author = "Hopper, {K. D.} and Catherine Abendroth and Sturtz, {K. W.} and Matthews, {Y. L.} and Stevens, {L. A.} and Shirk, {S. J.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497611",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "653--660",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Hopper, KD, Abendroth, C, Sturtz, KW, Matthews, YL, Stevens, LA & Shirk, SJ 1993, 'Automated biopsy devices: A blinded evaluation', Radiology, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 653-660. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497611

Automated biopsy devices : A blinded evaluation. / Hopper, K. D.; Abendroth, Catherine; Sturtz, K. W.; Matthews, Y. L.; Stevens, L. A.; Shirk, S. J.

In: Radiology, Vol. 187, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 653-660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated biopsy devices

T2 - A blinded evaluation

AU - Hopper, K. D.

AU - Abendroth, Catherine

AU - Sturtz, K. W.

AU - Matthews, Y. L.

AU - Stevens, L. A.

AU - Shirk, S. J.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - To evaluate 20 different automated biopsy devices with respect to the quality of tissue obtained for histopathologic analysis, a total of 1,470 18- gauge biopsy specimens were obtained from 10 fresh autopsy cases, including 30 liver, 20 kidney, 10 pancreas, and 10 psoas muscle biopsy specimens per device and per biopsy depth. There was no statistical difference in the performance of the long-throw Biopty, ASAP 18, 1.9-cm UltraCut, long-throw Monopty, and 2.5-cm ABS biopsy guns. All obtained a large amount of tissue with minimal fragmentation or crush artifact. Most of the short-throw biopsy guns (depth of biopsy ≤ 1.1 cm) did not perform as well. Although the other guns performed adequately, less than optimal results were obtained with the Temno, Bio-Gun, Roth, Klear Kut, ABC, and Urocut biopsy guns. Most 18-gauge automated biopsy devices with a biopsy excursion of at least 2.0 cm provide a high-quality, diagnostically adequate specimen for histopathologic analysis.

AB - To evaluate 20 different automated biopsy devices with respect to the quality of tissue obtained for histopathologic analysis, a total of 1,470 18- gauge biopsy specimens were obtained from 10 fresh autopsy cases, including 30 liver, 20 kidney, 10 pancreas, and 10 psoas muscle biopsy specimens per device and per biopsy depth. There was no statistical difference in the performance of the long-throw Biopty, ASAP 18, 1.9-cm UltraCut, long-throw Monopty, and 2.5-cm ABS biopsy guns. All obtained a large amount of tissue with minimal fragmentation or crush artifact. Most of the short-throw biopsy guns (depth of biopsy ≤ 1.1 cm) did not perform as well. Although the other guns performed adequately, less than optimal results were obtained with the Temno, Bio-Gun, Roth, Klear Kut, ABC, and Urocut biopsy guns. Most 18-gauge automated biopsy devices with a biopsy excursion of at least 2.0 cm provide a high-quality, diagnostically adequate specimen for histopathologic analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027173858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027173858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497611

DO - 10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497611

M3 - Article

C2 - 8497611

AN - SCOPUS:0027173858

VL - 187

SP - 653

EP - 660

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -

Hopper KD, Abendroth C, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Stevens LA, Shirk SJ. Automated biopsy devices: A blinded evaluation. Radiology. 1993 Jan 1;187(3):653-660. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497611