Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research investigating corpora of English learners’ language raises new questions about how syntactic complexity is defined theoretically and operationally for second language (L2) writing assessment. I show that syntactic complexity is important in construct definitions and L2 writing rating scales as well as in L2 writing research. I describe the operationalizations of syntactic complexity measurement in corpus-based L2 writing research, focusing on the Biber Tagger (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad, & Finegan, 1999), Coh-Metrix (McNamara, Graesser, McCarthy, & Cai, 2014), and L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (Lu, 2010), which are three tools commonly used to automate syntactic complexity analysis. A review of findings from recent corpus-based L2 writing studies on the relationship of syntactic complexity to L2 writing quality follows. I conclude with a discussion of the implications of these multiple perspectives on the definition of syntactic complexity in L2 studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-511
Number of pages19
JournalLanguage Testing
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

operationalization
rating scale
L2 Writing
Corpus-based
Writing Assessment
Writing Research
Syntactic Complexity
English language
language
Operationalization
Rating Scales
Language
Tag
English Language Learners

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{9aed0f51d0484f47a63fc83898b4f94b,
title = "Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment",
abstract = "Research investigating corpora of English learners’ language raises new questions about how syntactic complexity is defined theoretically and operationally for second language (L2) writing assessment. I show that syntactic complexity is important in construct definitions and L2 writing rating scales as well as in L2 writing research. I describe the operationalizations of syntactic complexity measurement in corpus-based L2 writing research, focusing on the Biber Tagger (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad, & Finegan, 1999), Coh-Metrix (McNamara, Graesser, McCarthy, & Cai, 2014), and L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (Lu, 2010), which are three tools commonly used to automate syntactic complexity analysis. A review of findings from recent corpus-based L2 writing studies on the relationship of syntactic complexity to L2 writing quality follows. I conclude with a discussion of the implications of these multiple perspectives on the definition of syntactic complexity in L2 studies.",
author = "Xiaofei Lu",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0265532217710675",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "493--511",
journal = "Language Testing",
issn = "0265-5322",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment. / Lu, Xiaofei.

In: Language Testing, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.10.2017, p. 493-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment

AU - Lu, Xiaofei

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Research investigating corpora of English learners’ language raises new questions about how syntactic complexity is defined theoretically and operationally for second language (L2) writing assessment. I show that syntactic complexity is important in construct definitions and L2 writing rating scales as well as in L2 writing research. I describe the operationalizations of syntactic complexity measurement in corpus-based L2 writing research, focusing on the Biber Tagger (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad, & Finegan, 1999), Coh-Metrix (McNamara, Graesser, McCarthy, & Cai, 2014), and L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (Lu, 2010), which are three tools commonly used to automate syntactic complexity analysis. A review of findings from recent corpus-based L2 writing studies on the relationship of syntactic complexity to L2 writing quality follows. I conclude with a discussion of the implications of these multiple perspectives on the definition of syntactic complexity in L2 studies.

AB - Research investigating corpora of English learners’ language raises new questions about how syntactic complexity is defined theoretically and operationally for second language (L2) writing assessment. I show that syntactic complexity is important in construct definitions and L2 writing rating scales as well as in L2 writing research. I describe the operationalizations of syntactic complexity measurement in corpus-based L2 writing research, focusing on the Biber Tagger (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad, & Finegan, 1999), Coh-Metrix (McNamara, Graesser, McCarthy, & Cai, 2014), and L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (Lu, 2010), which are three tools commonly used to automate syntactic complexity analysis. A review of findings from recent corpus-based L2 writing studies on the relationship of syntactic complexity to L2 writing quality follows. I conclude with a discussion of the implications of these multiple perspectives on the definition of syntactic complexity in L2 studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029715333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029715333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0265532217710675

DO - 10.1177/0265532217710675

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029715333

VL - 34

SP - 493

EP - 511

JO - Language Testing

JF - Language Testing

SN - 0265-5322

IS - 4

ER -