Autonomy for Inmates

Counterculture or Cooptation?

D. Wayne Osgood, Enid Gruber, Mark A. Archer, Theodore M. Newcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An inmate counterculture presents a barrier to the institutional goal of long-term reform. If the counterculture is a reaction to deprivations caused by incarceration, increasing autonomy would help co-opt the counterculture to cooperation with the institutional program. Data concerning autonomy for inmates and their adaptation to incarceration were collected from over 400 residents and 160 staff members at institutions for juvenile offenders. The research design avoided confounding autonomy with inmate characteristics and institutional setting, and included a broad range of measures of inmates' adaptation. Inmate reports of greater autonomy were associated with adaptations that were considerably more favorable to institutional goals. There was little relationship between staff reports of autonomy and either inmate reports of autonomy or inmate adaptation. This can be explained by a lack of variance in staff perceptions of groups, meaning that staff members failed to discriminate differences that were substantial in the eyes of inmates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-89
Number of pages19
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1985

Fingerprint

subculture
Research Design
autonomy
staff
juvenile offender
deprivation
research planning
resident
reform
lack
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Law

Cite this

Osgood, D. W., Gruber, E., Archer, M. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (1985). Autonomy for Inmates: Counterculture or Cooptation? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012001006
Osgood, D. Wayne ; Gruber, Enid ; Archer, Mark A. ; Newcomb, Theodore M. / Autonomy for Inmates : Counterculture or Cooptation?. In: Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1985 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 71-89.
@article{6a74d94eb6e74cbbace576607908542b,
title = "Autonomy for Inmates: Counterculture or Cooptation?",
abstract = "An inmate counterculture presents a barrier to the institutional goal of long-term reform. If the counterculture is a reaction to deprivations caused by incarceration, increasing autonomy would help co-opt the counterculture to cooperation with the institutional program. Data concerning autonomy for inmates and their adaptation to incarceration were collected from over 400 residents and 160 staff members at institutions for juvenile offenders. The research design avoided confounding autonomy with inmate characteristics and institutional setting, and included a broad range of measures of inmates' adaptation. Inmate reports of greater autonomy were associated with adaptations that were considerably more favorable to institutional goals. There was little relationship between staff reports of autonomy and either inmate reports of autonomy or inmate adaptation. This can be explained by a lack of variance in staff perceptions of groups, meaning that staff members failed to discriminate differences that were substantial in the eyes of inmates.",
author = "Osgood, {D. Wayne} and Enid Gruber and Archer, {Mark A.} and Newcomb, {Theodore M.}",
year = "1985",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093854885012001006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "71--89",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Osgood, DW, Gruber, E, Archer, MA & Newcomb, TM 1985, 'Autonomy for Inmates: Counterculture or Cooptation?', Criminal Justice and Behavior, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012001006

Autonomy for Inmates : Counterculture or Cooptation? / Osgood, D. Wayne; Gruber, Enid; Archer, Mark A.; Newcomb, Theodore M.

In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.1985, p. 71-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autonomy for Inmates

T2 - Counterculture or Cooptation?

AU - Osgood, D. Wayne

AU - Gruber, Enid

AU - Archer, Mark A.

AU - Newcomb, Theodore M.

PY - 1985/1/1

Y1 - 1985/1/1

N2 - An inmate counterculture presents a barrier to the institutional goal of long-term reform. If the counterculture is a reaction to deprivations caused by incarceration, increasing autonomy would help co-opt the counterculture to cooperation with the institutional program. Data concerning autonomy for inmates and their adaptation to incarceration were collected from over 400 residents and 160 staff members at institutions for juvenile offenders. The research design avoided confounding autonomy with inmate characteristics and institutional setting, and included a broad range of measures of inmates' adaptation. Inmate reports of greater autonomy were associated with adaptations that were considerably more favorable to institutional goals. There was little relationship between staff reports of autonomy and either inmate reports of autonomy or inmate adaptation. This can be explained by a lack of variance in staff perceptions of groups, meaning that staff members failed to discriminate differences that were substantial in the eyes of inmates.

AB - An inmate counterculture presents a barrier to the institutional goal of long-term reform. If the counterculture is a reaction to deprivations caused by incarceration, increasing autonomy would help co-opt the counterculture to cooperation with the institutional program. Data concerning autonomy for inmates and their adaptation to incarceration were collected from over 400 residents and 160 staff members at institutions for juvenile offenders. The research design avoided confounding autonomy with inmate characteristics and institutional setting, and included a broad range of measures of inmates' adaptation. Inmate reports of greater autonomy were associated with adaptations that were considerably more favorable to institutional goals. There was little relationship between staff reports of autonomy and either inmate reports of autonomy or inmate adaptation. This can be explained by a lack of variance in staff perceptions of groups, meaning that staff members failed to discriminate differences that were substantial in the eyes of inmates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964130512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964130512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854885012001006

DO - 10.1177/0093854885012001006

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 71

EP - 89

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 1

ER -