Avoiding the struggle: Instruction that supports students' motivation in reading and writing about content material

Linda H. Mason, Hedda Meadan, Laura R. Hedin, Maryanne Mong Cramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate motivation among 20 fourth-grade students who struggle with reading and writing prior to and after receiving either self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) instruction for expository reading comprehension or SRSD instruction for expository reading comprehension plus informative writing. We performed qualitative, descriptive, and statistical analysis on 3 data sets to gain insight into student perceptions across a variety of motivational factors and dimensions. Results indicated that students' efficacy increased after instruction in both interventions; however, efficacy was more varied across interventions for interest, self-regulation (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation), and task perception. Findings indicated that social factors could be better developed in both interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-96
Number of pages27
JournalReading and Writing Quarterly
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

instruction
development strategy
comprehension
motivation to study
extrinsic motivation
student
intrinsic motivation
self-regulation
statistical analysis
social factors

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{b70abf25ad7d47349558e47b35c7fcfe,
title = "Avoiding the struggle: Instruction that supports students' motivation in reading and writing about content material",
abstract = "We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate motivation among 20 fourth-grade students who struggle with reading and writing prior to and after receiving either self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) instruction for expository reading comprehension or SRSD instruction for expository reading comprehension plus informative writing. We performed qualitative, descriptive, and statistical analysis on 3 data sets to gain insight into student perceptions across a variety of motivational factors and dimensions. Results indicated that students' efficacy increased after instruction in both interventions; however, efficacy was more varied across interventions for interest, self-regulation (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation), and task perception. Findings indicated that social factors could be better developed in both interventions.",
author = "Mason, {Linda H.} and Hedda Meadan and Hedin, {Laura R.} and Cramer, {Maryanne Mong}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10573569.2012.632734",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "70--96",
journal = "Reading and Writing Quarterly",
issn = "1057-3569",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Avoiding the struggle : Instruction that supports students' motivation in reading and writing about content material. / Mason, Linda H.; Meadan, Hedda; Hedin, Laura R.; Cramer, Maryanne Mong.

In: Reading and Writing Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 70-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Avoiding the struggle

T2 - Instruction that supports students' motivation in reading and writing about content material

AU - Mason, Linda H.

AU - Meadan, Hedda

AU - Hedin, Laura R.

AU - Cramer, Maryanne Mong

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate motivation among 20 fourth-grade students who struggle with reading and writing prior to and after receiving either self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) instruction for expository reading comprehension or SRSD instruction for expository reading comprehension plus informative writing. We performed qualitative, descriptive, and statistical analysis on 3 data sets to gain insight into student perceptions across a variety of motivational factors and dimensions. Results indicated that students' efficacy increased after instruction in both interventions; however, efficacy was more varied across interventions for interest, self-regulation (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation), and task perception. Findings indicated that social factors could be better developed in both interventions.

AB - We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate motivation among 20 fourth-grade students who struggle with reading and writing prior to and after receiving either self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) instruction for expository reading comprehension or SRSD instruction for expository reading comprehension plus informative writing. We performed qualitative, descriptive, and statistical analysis on 3 data sets to gain insight into student perceptions across a variety of motivational factors and dimensions. Results indicated that students' efficacy increased after instruction in both interventions; however, efficacy was more varied across interventions for interest, self-regulation (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation), and task perception. Findings indicated that social factors could be better developed in both interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861159967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861159967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10573569.2012.632734

DO - 10.1080/10573569.2012.632734

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84861159967

VL - 28

SP - 70

EP - 96

JO - Reading and Writing Quarterly

JF - Reading and Writing Quarterly

SN - 1057-3569

IS - 1

ER -