Axiologies: Past and present concepts of literary value

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Verdicts concerning a work's worth, "good," "bad," or "great," vary wildly at any point and change radically over time. Much depends on what didactic or aesthetic rules are imposed and what modes of reading hold sway. Many critics see the purpose of literature as didactic; others subscribe to the principle of art for art's sake. We need to know whether we are debating a text or disputing the evaluative criteria applicable to it. We need to ask how certain we are of what the author meant to accomplish. Henry Fielding and David Hume remind us that a range of judgments is unavoidable: people differ, and so do aesthetic and moral preferences. So if subjectivity is inescapable, we should accept chaotic diversity in a spirit of courteous toleration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-172
Number of pages34
JournalModern Language Quarterly
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Axiologies: Past and present concepts of literary value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this