Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior

Linda Klebe Trevino, Stuart A. Youngblood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

574 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study proposed and tested a multiple-influences causal model of ethical decision-making behavior. Social learning, stage of cognitive moral development (CMD), and locus of control (LC) were hypothesized to influence ethical decision making. The mediating influence of outcome expectancies was also hypothesized. Social learning conditions (vicarious reward, vicarious punishment, and control) were manipulated with an in-basket exercise. Path analysis revealed that ethical decision making was influenced directly by CMD. LC influenced ethical decision making directly and indirectly through outcome expectancies. Vicarious reward influenced ethical decision making indirectly through outcome expectancies. No support was found for the direct effects of vicarious reward or punishment. Future research directions and theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-385
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume75
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1990

Fingerprint

Ethical Analysis
Decision Making
Reward
Moral Development
Punishment
Internal-External Control
Social Conditions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{3324c0883aa6434bad6307bcba14b28e,
title = "Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior",
abstract = "This study proposed and tested a multiple-influences causal model of ethical decision-making behavior. Social learning, stage of cognitive moral development (CMD), and locus of control (LC) were hypothesized to influence ethical decision making. The mediating influence of outcome expectancies was also hypothesized. Social learning conditions (vicarious reward, vicarious punishment, and control) were manipulated with an in-basket exercise. Path analysis revealed that ethical decision making was influenced directly by CMD. LC influenced ethical decision making directly and indirectly through outcome expectancies. Vicarious reward influenced ethical decision making indirectly through outcome expectancies. No support was found for the direct effects of vicarious reward or punishment. Future research directions and theoretical and practical implications are discussed.",
author = "Trevino, {Linda Klebe} and Youngblood, {Stuart A.}",
year = "1990",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.378",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "378--385",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Bad Apples in Bad Barrels : A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. / Trevino, Linda Klebe; Youngblood, Stuart A.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 4, 08.1990, p. 378-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bad Apples in Bad Barrels

T2 - A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior

AU - Trevino, Linda Klebe

AU - Youngblood, Stuart A.

PY - 1990/8

Y1 - 1990/8

N2 - This study proposed and tested a multiple-influences causal model of ethical decision-making behavior. Social learning, stage of cognitive moral development (CMD), and locus of control (LC) were hypothesized to influence ethical decision making. The mediating influence of outcome expectancies was also hypothesized. Social learning conditions (vicarious reward, vicarious punishment, and control) were manipulated with an in-basket exercise. Path analysis revealed that ethical decision making was influenced directly by CMD. LC influenced ethical decision making directly and indirectly through outcome expectancies. Vicarious reward influenced ethical decision making indirectly through outcome expectancies. No support was found for the direct effects of vicarious reward or punishment. Future research directions and theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

AB - This study proposed and tested a multiple-influences causal model of ethical decision-making behavior. Social learning, stage of cognitive moral development (CMD), and locus of control (LC) were hypothesized to influence ethical decision making. The mediating influence of outcome expectancies was also hypothesized. Social learning conditions (vicarious reward, vicarious punishment, and control) were manipulated with an in-basket exercise. Path analysis revealed that ethical decision making was influenced directly by CMD. LC influenced ethical decision making directly and indirectly through outcome expectancies. Vicarious reward influenced ethical decision making indirectly through outcome expectancies. No support was found for the direct effects of vicarious reward or punishment. Future research directions and theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750685033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750685033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.378

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.378

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33750685033

VL - 75

SP - 378

EP - 385

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 4

ER -