Bargaining or Backlash? Evidence on Intimate Partner Violence from the Dominican Republic

Cruz Caridad Bueno, Errol Anthony Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay explores the role of economic, political, and social factors in the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV). It considers the extent to which two prominent theses on the determinants of IPV–(1) the household bargaining model (HBM), and (2) the male backlash model (MBM)–best explain this phenomenon in the case of the Dominican Republic. Drawing on the 2007 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), which differentiates between physical and sexual IPV, results from logistic regressions reveal that the HBM better explains physical IPV, while the MBM better predicts sexual IPV. Further, the HBM does better accounting for IPV among wealthier women, while the MBM best explains IPV among poorer women. The findings suggest the need to reconsider broad programs and policies intended to prevent and ameliorate IPV in the Dominican Republic, and to implement targeted initiatives focusing on the economic factors motivating them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-116
Number of pages27
JournalFeminist Economics
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2017

Fingerprint

Dominican Republic
violence
evidence
economic factors
Intimate Partner Violence
Backlash
Intimate partner violence
political factors
social factors
incidence
logistics
determinants
regression
health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{44dc0c705c9847b497cd6526006e82c0,
title = "Bargaining or Backlash? Evidence on Intimate Partner Violence from the Dominican Republic",
abstract = "This essay explores the role of economic, political, and social factors in the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV). It considers the extent to which two prominent theses on the determinants of IPV–(1) the household bargaining model (HBM), and (2) the male backlash model (MBM)–best explain this phenomenon in the case of the Dominican Republic. Drawing on the 2007 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), which differentiates between physical and sexual IPV, results from logistic regressions reveal that the HBM better explains physical IPV, while the MBM better predicts sexual IPV. Further, the HBM does better accounting for IPV among wealthier women, while the MBM best explains IPV among poorer women. The findings suggest the need to reconsider broad programs and policies intended to prevent and ameliorate IPV in the Dominican Republic, and to implement targeted initiatives focusing on the economic factors motivating them.",
author = "{Caridad Bueno}, Cruz and Henderson, {Errol Anthony}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/13545701.2017.1292360",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "90--116",
journal = "Feminist Economics",
issn = "1354-5701",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Bargaining or Backlash? Evidence on Intimate Partner Violence from the Dominican Republic. / Caridad Bueno, Cruz; Henderson, Errol Anthony.

In: Feminist Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4, 02.10.2017, p. 90-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bargaining or Backlash? Evidence on Intimate Partner Violence from the Dominican Republic

AU - Caridad Bueno, Cruz

AU - Henderson, Errol Anthony

PY - 2017/10/2

Y1 - 2017/10/2

N2 - This essay explores the role of economic, political, and social factors in the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV). It considers the extent to which two prominent theses on the determinants of IPV–(1) the household bargaining model (HBM), and (2) the male backlash model (MBM)–best explain this phenomenon in the case of the Dominican Republic. Drawing on the 2007 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), which differentiates between physical and sexual IPV, results from logistic regressions reveal that the HBM better explains physical IPV, while the MBM better predicts sexual IPV. Further, the HBM does better accounting for IPV among wealthier women, while the MBM best explains IPV among poorer women. The findings suggest the need to reconsider broad programs and policies intended to prevent and ameliorate IPV in the Dominican Republic, and to implement targeted initiatives focusing on the economic factors motivating them.

AB - This essay explores the role of economic, political, and social factors in the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV). It considers the extent to which two prominent theses on the determinants of IPV–(1) the household bargaining model (HBM), and (2) the male backlash model (MBM)–best explain this phenomenon in the case of the Dominican Republic. Drawing on the 2007 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), which differentiates between physical and sexual IPV, results from logistic regressions reveal that the HBM better explains physical IPV, while the MBM better predicts sexual IPV. Further, the HBM does better accounting for IPV among wealthier women, while the MBM best explains IPV among poorer women. The findings suggest the need to reconsider broad programs and policies intended to prevent and ameliorate IPV in the Dominican Republic, and to implement targeted initiatives focusing on the economic factors motivating them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014623316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014623316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13545701.2017.1292360

DO - 10.1080/13545701.2017.1292360

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014623316

VL - 23

SP - 90

EP - 116

JO - Feminist Economics

JF - Feminist Economics

SN - 1354-5701

IS - 4

ER -