Barriers to compliance with emergency department discharge instructions

lessons learned from patients’ perspectives

Erica Schenhals, Paul Haidet, Lawrence Kass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The objective of this study is to understand patients’ perspectives about system-based barriers that may influence decision-making regarding following discharge instructions. In this qualitative study, subjects were interviewed by phone 1–4 weeks following being discharged to home from the emergency department (ED). We used a semi-structured interview guide to ask a series of open-ended questions about subjects’ recent ED visit and subsequent course, including discharge instructions, whether or not they complied with those instructions, and reasoning behind their decisions to follow-up or not. All interviews were recorded and transcribed to identify themes among the transcripts, which were analyzed to identify barriers to compliance. While the majority of those interviewed expressed no specific concerns or challenges, four system-based themes did emerge regarding patient attitudes toward and experiences with discharge instructions. They were: (1) failure to ensure clarity about diagnosis at the time of discharge from the ED, (2) failure to identify patients’ feelings of hopelessness regarding the utility of follow-up, (3) difficulty in scheduling follow-up appointments, and (4) the importance of a clear discharge process. This study finds several system-based barriers might influence compliance. The four identified themes suggest a recurring cycle of visiting the ED, being discharged to primary care or specialists, and ultimately returning to the ED. We propose that systems-based interventions may help to break this cycle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-138
Number of pages6
JournalInternal and Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2019

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Compliance
Interviews
Primary Health Care
Decision Making
Appointments and Schedules
Emotions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

@article{23190834dddc4f92a6c6570f4c45e8c4,
title = "Barriers to compliance with emergency department discharge instructions: lessons learned from patients’ perspectives",
abstract = "The objective of this study is to understand patients’ perspectives about system-based barriers that may influence decision-making regarding following discharge instructions. In this qualitative study, subjects were interviewed by phone 1–4 weeks following being discharged to home from the emergency department (ED). We used a semi-structured interview guide to ask a series of open-ended questions about subjects’ recent ED visit and subsequent course, including discharge instructions, whether or not they complied with those instructions, and reasoning behind their decisions to follow-up or not. All interviews were recorded and transcribed to identify themes among the transcripts, which were analyzed to identify barriers to compliance. While the majority of those interviewed expressed no specific concerns or challenges, four system-based themes did emerge regarding patient attitudes toward and experiences with discharge instructions. They were: (1) failure to ensure clarity about diagnosis at the time of discharge from the ED, (2) failure to identify patients’ feelings of hopelessness regarding the utility of follow-up, (3) difficulty in scheduling follow-up appointments, and (4) the importance of a clear discharge process. This study finds several system-based barriers might influence compliance. The four identified themes suggest a recurring cycle of visiting the ED, being discharged to primary care or specialists, and ultimately returning to the ED. We propose that systems-based interventions may help to break this cycle.",
author = "Erica Schenhals and Paul Haidet and Lawrence Kass",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1007/s11739-018-1943-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "133--138",
journal = "Internal and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1828-0447",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to compliance with emergency department discharge instructions

T2 - lessons learned from patients’ perspectives

AU - Schenhals, Erica

AU - Haidet, Paul

AU - Kass, Lawrence

PY - 2019/1/24

Y1 - 2019/1/24

N2 - The objective of this study is to understand patients’ perspectives about system-based barriers that may influence decision-making regarding following discharge instructions. In this qualitative study, subjects were interviewed by phone 1–4 weeks following being discharged to home from the emergency department (ED). We used a semi-structured interview guide to ask a series of open-ended questions about subjects’ recent ED visit and subsequent course, including discharge instructions, whether or not they complied with those instructions, and reasoning behind their decisions to follow-up or not. All interviews were recorded and transcribed to identify themes among the transcripts, which were analyzed to identify barriers to compliance. While the majority of those interviewed expressed no specific concerns or challenges, four system-based themes did emerge regarding patient attitudes toward and experiences with discharge instructions. They were: (1) failure to ensure clarity about diagnosis at the time of discharge from the ED, (2) failure to identify patients’ feelings of hopelessness regarding the utility of follow-up, (3) difficulty in scheduling follow-up appointments, and (4) the importance of a clear discharge process. This study finds several system-based barriers might influence compliance. The four identified themes suggest a recurring cycle of visiting the ED, being discharged to primary care or specialists, and ultimately returning to the ED. We propose that systems-based interventions may help to break this cycle.

AB - The objective of this study is to understand patients’ perspectives about system-based barriers that may influence decision-making regarding following discharge instructions. In this qualitative study, subjects were interviewed by phone 1–4 weeks following being discharged to home from the emergency department (ED). We used a semi-structured interview guide to ask a series of open-ended questions about subjects’ recent ED visit and subsequent course, including discharge instructions, whether or not they complied with those instructions, and reasoning behind their decisions to follow-up or not. All interviews were recorded and transcribed to identify themes among the transcripts, which were analyzed to identify barriers to compliance. While the majority of those interviewed expressed no specific concerns or challenges, four system-based themes did emerge regarding patient attitudes toward and experiences with discharge instructions. They were: (1) failure to ensure clarity about diagnosis at the time of discharge from the ED, (2) failure to identify patients’ feelings of hopelessness regarding the utility of follow-up, (3) difficulty in scheduling follow-up appointments, and (4) the importance of a clear discharge process. This study finds several system-based barriers might influence compliance. The four identified themes suggest a recurring cycle of visiting the ED, being discharged to primary care or specialists, and ultimately returning to the ED. We propose that systems-based interventions may help to break this cycle.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053529781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053529781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11739-018-1943-6

DO - 10.1007/s11739-018-1943-6

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 133

EP - 138

JO - Internal and Emergency Medicine

JF - Internal and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1828-0447

IS - 1

ER -