Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research: Perceptions of Life Scientists

Jennifer McCormick, Angie M. Boyce, Jennifer M. Ladd, Mildred K. Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: As part of an empirical study investigating how life scientists think about ethical and societal implications of their work, and about life science research in general, we sought to elucidate barriers that scientists might face in considering such implications. Methods: Between 2005 and 2007, we conducted a study consisting of phone interviews, focus groups, and a national survey of life scientists at biomedical research institutions. The study population included graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, faculty, clinical instructors, and research staff. We analyzed data through qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: In analyzing the data, we found that life scientists do, in fact, face barriers to considering ethical and societal implications of research. We categorized these barriers as falling into four broad domains: (1) lack of awareness of ethical and societal implications; (2) lack of relevance of such concerns to their specific research; (3) self-confidence in their ability to resolve such concerns; and (4) aspects of the daily practice of science itself. Conclusions: Life science researchers experience elements inherent in their training and in the conduct of science as barriers to thinking about ethical and societal implications related to their work. These findings suggest areas in which research ethics educators, bioethicists, and the scientific community can focus their efforts to improve social and ethical accountability in research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-50
Number of pages11
JournalAJOB Primary Research
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Research
Biological Science Disciplines
life sciences
Ethicists
Research Ethics
Aptitude
Social Responsibility
Focus Groups
research ethics
lack
self-confidence
scientific community
Biomedical Research
science
quantitative method
qualitative method
Research Personnel
Interviews
Students
instructor

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

McCormick, Jennifer ; Boyce, Angie M. ; Ladd, Jennifer M. ; Cho, Mildred K. / Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research : Perceptions of Life Scientists. In: AJOB Primary Research. 2012 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 40-50.
@article{ac975ecc432845198e9b11de46eeeeff,
title = "Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research: Perceptions of Life Scientists",
abstract = "Background: As part of an empirical study investigating how life scientists think about ethical and societal implications of their work, and about life science research in general, we sought to elucidate barriers that scientists might face in considering such implications. Methods: Between 2005 and 2007, we conducted a study consisting of phone interviews, focus groups, and a national survey of life scientists at biomedical research institutions. The study population included graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, faculty, clinical instructors, and research staff. We analyzed data through qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: In analyzing the data, we found that life scientists do, in fact, face barriers to considering ethical and societal implications of research. We categorized these barriers as falling into four broad domains: (1) lack of awareness of ethical and societal implications; (2) lack of relevance of such concerns to their specific research; (3) self-confidence in their ability to resolve such concerns; and (4) aspects of the daily practice of science itself. Conclusions: Life science researchers experience elements inherent in their training and in the conduct of science as barriers to thinking about ethical and societal implications related to their work. These findings suggest areas in which research ethics educators, bioethicists, and the scientific community can focus their efforts to improve social and ethical accountability in research.",
author = "Jennifer McCormick and Boyce, {Angie M.} and Ladd, {Jennifer M.} and Cho, {Mildred K.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/21507716.2012.680651",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "40--50",
journal = "AJOB Empirical Bioethics",
issn = "2329-4515",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research : Perceptions of Life Scientists. / McCormick, Jennifer; Boyce, Angie M.; Ladd, Jennifer M.; Cho, Mildred K.

In: AJOB Primary Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.07.2012, p. 40-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research

T2 - Perceptions of Life Scientists

AU - McCormick, Jennifer

AU - Boyce, Angie M.

AU - Ladd, Jennifer M.

AU - Cho, Mildred K.

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Background: As part of an empirical study investigating how life scientists think about ethical and societal implications of their work, and about life science research in general, we sought to elucidate barriers that scientists might face in considering such implications. Methods: Between 2005 and 2007, we conducted a study consisting of phone interviews, focus groups, and a national survey of life scientists at biomedical research institutions. The study population included graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, faculty, clinical instructors, and research staff. We analyzed data through qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: In analyzing the data, we found that life scientists do, in fact, face barriers to considering ethical and societal implications of research. We categorized these barriers as falling into four broad domains: (1) lack of awareness of ethical and societal implications; (2) lack of relevance of such concerns to their specific research; (3) self-confidence in their ability to resolve such concerns; and (4) aspects of the daily practice of science itself. Conclusions: Life science researchers experience elements inherent in their training and in the conduct of science as barriers to thinking about ethical and societal implications related to their work. These findings suggest areas in which research ethics educators, bioethicists, and the scientific community can focus their efforts to improve social and ethical accountability in research.

AB - Background: As part of an empirical study investigating how life scientists think about ethical and societal implications of their work, and about life science research in general, we sought to elucidate barriers that scientists might face in considering such implications. Methods: Between 2005 and 2007, we conducted a study consisting of phone interviews, focus groups, and a national survey of life scientists at biomedical research institutions. The study population included graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, faculty, clinical instructors, and research staff. We analyzed data through qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: In analyzing the data, we found that life scientists do, in fact, face barriers to considering ethical and societal implications of research. We categorized these barriers as falling into four broad domains: (1) lack of awareness of ethical and societal implications; (2) lack of relevance of such concerns to their specific research; (3) self-confidence in their ability to resolve such concerns; and (4) aspects of the daily practice of science itself. Conclusions: Life science researchers experience elements inherent in their training and in the conduct of science as barriers to thinking about ethical and societal implications related to their work. These findings suggest areas in which research ethics educators, bioethicists, and the scientific community can focus their efforts to improve social and ethical accountability in research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862605169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862605169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21507716.2012.680651

DO - 10.1080/21507716.2012.680651

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862605169

VL - 3

SP - 40

EP - 50

JO - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

JF - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

SN - 2329-4515

IS - 3

ER -