Barter markets for conjoint analysis

Min Ding, Young Hoon Park, Eric T. Bradlow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a new alternative preference measurement method, barter conjoint, to contrast with traditional choice-based conjoint (CBC) approaches. Barter conjoint collects a substantially larger amount of data compared to CBC and allows for information diffusion among respondents. We conducted two empirical studies that compare CBC (with and without incentive alignment) and barter conjoint. The studies employed a total of three product categories, each with two validation tasks (one follows immediately and one conducted two weeks later). Our results confirmed prior research that incentive alignment, in general, substantially improves out-of-sample predictive performance of CBC. Furthermore, we found barter conjoint performs substantially better than the incentive-aligned CBC. However, in the spirit of "no free lunch," barter conjoint is more taxing (in various ways) than CBC, suggesting a potential trade-off between consumer resource allocation (at the time of the task) and (managerial) predictive accuracy downstream. Given that this is the first study on barter conjoint, we discuss various limitations of the current implementation and fruitful directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1003-1017
Number of pages15
JournalManagement Science
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Barter
Conjoint analysis
Incentive alignment
Predictive accuracy
Trade-offs
Incentives
Measurement method
Information diffusion
Preference measurement
Resource allocation
Empirical study
Free lunch
Product category

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Ding, Min ; Park, Young Hoon ; Bradlow, Eric T. / Barter markets for conjoint analysis. In: Management Science. 2009 ; Vol. 55, No. 6. pp. 1003-1017.
@article{e6f42f83bf00413790651cacb60e953d,
title = "Barter markets for conjoint analysis",
abstract = "We propose a new alternative preference measurement method, barter conjoint, to contrast with traditional choice-based conjoint (CBC) approaches. Barter conjoint collects a substantially larger amount of data compared to CBC and allows for information diffusion among respondents. We conducted two empirical studies that compare CBC (with and without incentive alignment) and barter conjoint. The studies employed a total of three product categories, each with two validation tasks (one follows immediately and one conducted two weeks later). Our results confirmed prior research that incentive alignment, in general, substantially improves out-of-sample predictive performance of CBC. Furthermore, we found barter conjoint performs substantially better than the incentive-aligned CBC. However, in the spirit of {"}no free lunch,{"} barter conjoint is more taxing (in various ways) than CBC, suggesting a potential trade-off between consumer resource allocation (at the time of the task) and (managerial) predictive accuracy downstream. Given that this is the first study on barter conjoint, we discuss various limitations of the current implementation and fruitful directions for future research.",
author = "Min Ding and Park, {Young Hoon} and Bradlow, {Eric T.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.1090.1003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1003--1017",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "6",

}

Ding, M, Park, YH & Bradlow, ET 2009, 'Barter markets for conjoint analysis', Management Science, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1003

Barter markets for conjoint analysis. / Ding, Min; Park, Young Hoon; Bradlow, Eric T.

In: Management Science, Vol. 55, No. 6, 01.06.2009, p. 1003-1017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barter markets for conjoint analysis

AU - Ding, Min

AU - Park, Young Hoon

AU - Bradlow, Eric T.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - We propose a new alternative preference measurement method, barter conjoint, to contrast with traditional choice-based conjoint (CBC) approaches. Barter conjoint collects a substantially larger amount of data compared to CBC and allows for information diffusion among respondents. We conducted two empirical studies that compare CBC (with and without incentive alignment) and barter conjoint. The studies employed a total of three product categories, each with two validation tasks (one follows immediately and one conducted two weeks later). Our results confirmed prior research that incentive alignment, in general, substantially improves out-of-sample predictive performance of CBC. Furthermore, we found barter conjoint performs substantially better than the incentive-aligned CBC. However, in the spirit of "no free lunch," barter conjoint is more taxing (in various ways) than CBC, suggesting a potential trade-off between consumer resource allocation (at the time of the task) and (managerial) predictive accuracy downstream. Given that this is the first study on barter conjoint, we discuss various limitations of the current implementation and fruitful directions for future research.

AB - We propose a new alternative preference measurement method, barter conjoint, to contrast with traditional choice-based conjoint (CBC) approaches. Barter conjoint collects a substantially larger amount of data compared to CBC and allows for information diffusion among respondents. We conducted two empirical studies that compare CBC (with and without incentive alignment) and barter conjoint. The studies employed a total of three product categories, each with two validation tasks (one follows immediately and one conducted two weeks later). Our results confirmed prior research that incentive alignment, in general, substantially improves out-of-sample predictive performance of CBC. Furthermore, we found barter conjoint performs substantially better than the incentive-aligned CBC. However, in the spirit of "no free lunch," barter conjoint is more taxing (in various ways) than CBC, suggesting a potential trade-off between consumer resource allocation (at the time of the task) and (managerial) predictive accuracy downstream. Given that this is the first study on barter conjoint, we discuss various limitations of the current implementation and fruitful directions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651092006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651092006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1003

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1003

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1003

EP - 1017

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 6

ER -