Baumol's cost disease and the withering of the state

Joshua Semat, David Lynn Lowery, Suzanna Linn, William D. Berry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Most theories of government growth place nearly exclusive attention on real changes in public sector activity. Yet, much nominal post-WWII government spending growth was not in the form of the public sector doing more relative to the general economy (real growth), but in the form of government activities becoming relatively more expensive (cost growth). Baumol's (1967) cost disease model is our best guide to understanding cost growth, but over time, Baumol has offered conflicting hypotheses about how cost growth bears on real growth. Using 1947-2012 U.S. data, we test these hypotheses, along with a more novel expectation, by modifying Berry and Lowery's (1987b) econometric models of real growth in public purchases and transfers to consider the influence of government cost growth on real public domestic spending.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-85
Number of pages33
JournalBusiness and Politics
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Disease
costs
public sector
Costs
econometrics
purchase
economy
Public sector
Government

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial relations
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Semat, Joshua ; Lowery, David Lynn ; Linn, Suzanna ; Berry, William D. / Baumol's cost disease and the withering of the state. In: Business and Politics. 2019 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 53-85.
@article{6462409455a048e39b96f88f80b821d4,
title = "Baumol's cost disease and the withering of the state",
abstract = "Most theories of government growth place nearly exclusive attention on real changes in public sector activity. Yet, much nominal post-WWII government spending growth was not in the form of the public sector doing more relative to the general economy (real growth), but in the form of government activities becoming relatively more expensive (cost growth). Baumol's (1967) cost disease model is our best guide to understanding cost growth, but over time, Baumol has offered conflicting hypotheses about how cost growth bears on real growth. Using 1947-2012 U.S. data, we test these hypotheses, along with a more novel expectation, by modifying Berry and Lowery's (1987b) econometric models of real growth in public purchases and transfers to consider the influence of government cost growth on real public domestic spending.",
author = "Joshua Semat and Lowery, {David Lynn} and Suzanna Linn and Berry, {William D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/bap.2018.10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "53--85",
journal = "Business and Politics",
issn = "1469-3569",
publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
number = "1",

}

Baumol's cost disease and the withering of the state. / Semat, Joshua; Lowery, David Lynn; Linn, Suzanna; Berry, William D.

In: Business and Politics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 53-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Baumol's cost disease and the withering of the state

AU - Semat, Joshua

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

AU - Linn, Suzanna

AU - Berry, William D.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Most theories of government growth place nearly exclusive attention on real changes in public sector activity. Yet, much nominal post-WWII government spending growth was not in the form of the public sector doing more relative to the general economy (real growth), but in the form of government activities becoming relatively more expensive (cost growth). Baumol's (1967) cost disease model is our best guide to understanding cost growth, but over time, Baumol has offered conflicting hypotheses about how cost growth bears on real growth. Using 1947-2012 U.S. data, we test these hypotheses, along with a more novel expectation, by modifying Berry and Lowery's (1987b) econometric models of real growth in public purchases and transfers to consider the influence of government cost growth on real public domestic spending.

AB - Most theories of government growth place nearly exclusive attention on real changes in public sector activity. Yet, much nominal post-WWII government spending growth was not in the form of the public sector doing more relative to the general economy (real growth), but in the form of government activities becoming relatively more expensive (cost growth). Baumol's (1967) cost disease model is our best guide to understanding cost growth, but over time, Baumol has offered conflicting hypotheses about how cost growth bears on real growth. Using 1947-2012 U.S. data, we test these hypotheses, along with a more novel expectation, by modifying Berry and Lowery's (1987b) econometric models of real growth in public purchases and transfers to consider the influence of government cost growth on real public domestic spending.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061015383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061015383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/bap.2018.10

DO - 10.1017/bap.2018.10

M3 - Review article

VL - 21

SP - 53

EP - 85

JO - Business and Politics

JF - Business and Politics

SN - 1469-3569

IS - 1

ER -