Behavior Analysts' Use of and Beliefs in Treatments for People with Autism: A 5-Year Follow-up

Kimberly Anne Schreck, Yenushka Karunaratne, Thomas Zane, Heather Wilford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As autism prevalence rises, parents of children with autism rely upon professionals to recommend the most effective treatment for their children. Historically, these professionals have chosen a range of treatments from empirically supported to nonempirically supported treatments. This study replicated and extended that work by surveying Board Certified Behavior Analysts to determine what treatments they promoted and used. Results showed that although most respondents used evidence-based, behavioral procedures, many did not. Influential stimuli most likely to contribute to behavior analysts' choices of treatments were beliefs in effectiveness, ease of implementation, and persuasion by others. Self-reported reinforcers for treatment use included perceived observed success, praise from others, and financial gain. Behavior analysts continue to use a variety of nonscientifically supported treatments, including those that have been deemed ineffective and harmful to people with autism. Future training of Board Certified Behavior Analysts must stress adherence to the ethical code for certified behavior analysts, adherence to data-based decision-making, and strict fealty to the scientific process in which all behavior analysts have been trained.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages355-376
Number of pages22
JournalBehavioral Interventions
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Therapeutics
Choice Behavior
Persuasive Communication
Codes of Ethics
Autism
Decision Making
Parents

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Schreck, Kimberly Anne ; Karunaratne, Yenushka ; Zane, Thomas ; Wilford, Heather. / Behavior Analysts' Use of and Beliefs in Treatments for People with Autism : A 5-Year Follow-up. In: Behavioral Interventions. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 355-376.
@article{02b703067f094aba9fe358768ca33436,
title = "Behavior Analysts' Use of and Beliefs in Treatments for People with Autism: A 5-Year Follow-up",
abstract = "As autism prevalence rises, parents of children with autism rely upon professionals to recommend the most effective treatment for their children. Historically, these professionals have chosen a range of treatments from empirically supported to nonempirically supported treatments. This study replicated and extended that work by surveying Board Certified Behavior Analysts to determine what treatments they promoted and used. Results showed that although most respondents used evidence-based, behavioral procedures, many did not. Influential stimuli most likely to contribute to behavior analysts' choices of treatments were beliefs in effectiveness, ease of implementation, and persuasion by others. Self-reported reinforcers for treatment use included perceived observed success, praise from others, and financial gain. Behavior analysts continue to use a variety of nonscientifically supported treatments, including those that have been deemed ineffective and harmful to people with autism. Future training of Board Certified Behavior Analysts must stress adherence to the ethical code for certified behavior analysts, adherence to data-based decision-making, and strict fealty to the scientific process in which all behavior analysts have been trained.",
author = "Schreck, {Kimberly Anne} and Yenushka Karunaratne and Thomas Zane and Heather Wilford",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bin.1461",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "355--376",
journal = "Behavioral Interventions",
issn = "1072-0847",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Behavior Analysts' Use of and Beliefs in Treatments for People with Autism : A 5-Year Follow-up. / Schreck, Kimberly Anne; Karunaratne, Yenushka; Zane, Thomas; Wilford, Heather.

In: Behavioral Interventions, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.11.2016, p. 355-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavior Analysts' Use of and Beliefs in Treatments for People with Autism

T2 - Behavioral Interventions

AU - Schreck, Kimberly Anne

AU - Karunaratne, Yenushka

AU - Zane, Thomas

AU - Wilford, Heather

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - As autism prevalence rises, parents of children with autism rely upon professionals to recommend the most effective treatment for their children. Historically, these professionals have chosen a range of treatments from empirically supported to nonempirically supported treatments. This study replicated and extended that work by surveying Board Certified Behavior Analysts to determine what treatments they promoted and used. Results showed that although most respondents used evidence-based, behavioral procedures, many did not. Influential stimuli most likely to contribute to behavior analysts' choices of treatments were beliefs in effectiveness, ease of implementation, and persuasion by others. Self-reported reinforcers for treatment use included perceived observed success, praise from others, and financial gain. Behavior analysts continue to use a variety of nonscientifically supported treatments, including those that have been deemed ineffective and harmful to people with autism. Future training of Board Certified Behavior Analysts must stress adherence to the ethical code for certified behavior analysts, adherence to data-based decision-making, and strict fealty to the scientific process in which all behavior analysts have been trained.

AB - As autism prevalence rises, parents of children with autism rely upon professionals to recommend the most effective treatment for their children. Historically, these professionals have chosen a range of treatments from empirically supported to nonempirically supported treatments. This study replicated and extended that work by surveying Board Certified Behavior Analysts to determine what treatments they promoted and used. Results showed that although most respondents used evidence-based, behavioral procedures, many did not. Influential stimuli most likely to contribute to behavior analysts' choices of treatments were beliefs in effectiveness, ease of implementation, and persuasion by others. Self-reported reinforcers for treatment use included perceived observed success, praise from others, and financial gain. Behavior analysts continue to use a variety of nonscientifically supported treatments, including those that have been deemed ineffective and harmful to people with autism. Future training of Board Certified Behavior Analysts must stress adherence to the ethical code for certified behavior analysts, adherence to data-based decision-making, and strict fealty to the scientific process in which all behavior analysts have been trained.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991396043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991396043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bin.1461

DO - 10.1002/bin.1461

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 355

EP - 376

JO - Behavioral Interventions

JF - Behavioral Interventions

SN - 1072-0847

IS - 4

ER -