Behind closed doors: university employees as stakeholders in campus sexual violence

Marina Rosenthal, Carly Smith, Jennifer J. Freyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine employees’ experiences of institutional betrayal after a campus sexual assault. Design/methodology/approach: University employees completed online measures evaluating various attitudes toward the university. Findings: The majority of participants reported institutional betrayal in the university’s response to the case. Employees who reported institutional betrayal indicated significantly lower attachment to the university than employees who reported no institutional betrayal. Institutional betrayal mediated the relationship between institutional attachment and institutional forgiveness. Social implications: Universities’ failure to respond effectively and promptly to sexual violence does not go unnoticed by employees. Institutional actions after sexual assault have the power to damage employees’ attachment to the university – employees who experienced institutional betrayal were less attached, and ultimately less forgiving of the institution. Universities’ poor prevention and response efforts impact their entire campus community and compromise community members’ ongoing relationship with the school. Originality/value: College students’ active resistance to sexual violence on campus is featured prominently on the pages of major news outlets. Yet, less featured in research and media is the impact of campus sexual assault on university employees, particularly after sexual assault cases are mishandled. This study offers perspective on employees’ experiences and reactions after a prominent sexual assault case.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-304
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Sex Offenses
sexual violence
stakeholder
employee
university
assault
Forgiveness
Students
Research
compromise
community
experience
damages
news
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

@article{f9fe94f12c864538a22845434055a986,
title = "Behind closed doors: university employees as stakeholders in campus sexual violence",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine employees’ experiences of institutional betrayal after a campus sexual assault. Design/methodology/approach: University employees completed online measures evaluating various attitudes toward the university. Findings: The majority of participants reported institutional betrayal in the university’s response to the case. Employees who reported institutional betrayal indicated significantly lower attachment to the university than employees who reported no institutional betrayal. Institutional betrayal mediated the relationship between institutional attachment and institutional forgiveness. Social implications: Universities’ failure to respond effectively and promptly to sexual violence does not go unnoticed by employees. Institutional actions after sexual assault have the power to damage employees’ attachment to the university – employees who experienced institutional betrayal were less attached, and ultimately less forgiving of the institution. Universities’ poor prevention and response efforts impact their entire campus community and compromise community members’ ongoing relationship with the school. Originality/value: College students’ active resistance to sexual violence on campus is featured prominently on the pages of major news outlets. Yet, less featured in research and media is the impact of campus sexual assault on university employees, particularly after sexual assault cases are mishandled. This study offers perspective on employees’ experiences and reactions after a prominent sexual assault case.",
author = "Marina Rosenthal and Carly Smith and Freyd, {Jennifer J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JACPR-02-2017-0272",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "290--304",
journal = "Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research",
issn = "1759-6599",
publisher = "Pier Professional Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Behind closed doors : university employees as stakeholders in campus sexual violence. / Rosenthal, Marina; Smith, Carly; Freyd, Jennifer J.

In: Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.01.2017, p. 290-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behind closed doors

T2 - university employees as stakeholders in campus sexual violence

AU - Rosenthal, Marina

AU - Smith, Carly

AU - Freyd, Jennifer J.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine employees’ experiences of institutional betrayal after a campus sexual assault. Design/methodology/approach: University employees completed online measures evaluating various attitudes toward the university. Findings: The majority of participants reported institutional betrayal in the university’s response to the case. Employees who reported institutional betrayal indicated significantly lower attachment to the university than employees who reported no institutional betrayal. Institutional betrayal mediated the relationship between institutional attachment and institutional forgiveness. Social implications: Universities’ failure to respond effectively and promptly to sexual violence does not go unnoticed by employees. Institutional actions after sexual assault have the power to damage employees’ attachment to the university – employees who experienced institutional betrayal were less attached, and ultimately less forgiving of the institution. Universities’ poor prevention and response efforts impact their entire campus community and compromise community members’ ongoing relationship with the school. Originality/value: College students’ active resistance to sexual violence on campus is featured prominently on the pages of major news outlets. Yet, less featured in research and media is the impact of campus sexual assault on university employees, particularly after sexual assault cases are mishandled. This study offers perspective on employees’ experiences and reactions after a prominent sexual assault case.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine employees’ experiences of institutional betrayal after a campus sexual assault. Design/methodology/approach: University employees completed online measures evaluating various attitudes toward the university. Findings: The majority of participants reported institutional betrayal in the university’s response to the case. Employees who reported institutional betrayal indicated significantly lower attachment to the university than employees who reported no institutional betrayal. Institutional betrayal mediated the relationship between institutional attachment and institutional forgiveness. Social implications: Universities’ failure to respond effectively and promptly to sexual violence does not go unnoticed by employees. Institutional actions after sexual assault have the power to damage employees’ attachment to the university – employees who experienced institutional betrayal were less attached, and ultimately less forgiving of the institution. Universities’ poor prevention and response efforts impact their entire campus community and compromise community members’ ongoing relationship with the school. Originality/value: College students’ active resistance to sexual violence on campus is featured prominently on the pages of major news outlets. Yet, less featured in research and media is the impact of campus sexual assault on university employees, particularly after sexual assault cases are mishandled. This study offers perspective on employees’ experiences and reactions after a prominent sexual assault case.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031775470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031775470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JACPR-02-2017-0272

DO - 10.1108/JACPR-02-2017-0272

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85031775470

VL - 9

SP - 290

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research

JF - Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research

SN - 1759-6599

IS - 4

ER -