Beliefs about arguing as predictors of trait argumentativeness: Implications for training in argument and conflict management

Andrew S. Rancer, Roberta L. Kosberg, Robert A. Baukus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research suggests that altering predispositions toward communication may be an effective prerequisite in training efforts that emphasize communication skill development. Utilizing a theoretical framework that maintains that a predisposition is controlled by a set of beliefs, this study sought to (a) identify beliefs about arguing that could explain variance in argumentativeness, and (b) determine beliefs that discriminate individuals who vary in the trait. Five composite beliefs about arguing (enjoyment, self-concept, pragmatic outcomes, dysfunctional outcomes, and ego-involvement) were found to explain significant variance in underlying motivation to argue and to discriminate between individuals who vary in the predisposition. Implications of the identification and use of these beliefs for communication pedagogy and curriculum design in argumentation and conflict management courses are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-387
Number of pages13
JournalCommunication Education
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1992

Fingerprint

conflict management
communication
Communication
self-concept
argumentation
communication skills
pragmatics
curriculum
Curricula
Composite materials
Conflict Management
Argumentativeness
Predictors
Predisposition

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Rancer, Andrew S. ; Kosberg, Roberta L. ; Baukus, Robert A. / Beliefs about arguing as predictors of trait argumentativeness : Implications for training in argument and conflict management. In: Communication Education. 1992 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 375-387.
@article{0dddb0a0d7c2444e91072e2f8d1002a7,
title = "Beliefs about arguing as predictors of trait argumentativeness: Implications for training in argument and conflict management",
abstract = "Previous research suggests that altering predispositions toward communication may be an effective prerequisite in training efforts that emphasize communication skill development. Utilizing a theoretical framework that maintains that a predisposition is controlled by a set of beliefs, this study sought to (a) identify beliefs about arguing that could explain variance in argumentativeness, and (b) determine beliefs that discriminate individuals who vary in the trait. Five composite beliefs about arguing (enjoyment, self-concept, pragmatic outcomes, dysfunctional outcomes, and ego-involvement) were found to explain significant variance in underlying motivation to argue and to discriminate between individuals who vary in the predisposition. Implications of the identification and use of these beliefs for communication pedagogy and curriculum design in argumentation and conflict management courses are discussed.",
author = "Rancer, {Andrew S.} and Kosberg, {Roberta L.} and Baukus, {Robert A.}",
year = "1992",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03634529209378899",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "375--387",
journal = "Communication Education",
issn = "0363-4523",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Beliefs about arguing as predictors of trait argumentativeness : Implications for training in argument and conflict management. / Rancer, Andrew S.; Kosberg, Roberta L.; Baukus, Robert A.

In: Communication Education, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.10.1992, p. 375-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beliefs about arguing as predictors of trait argumentativeness

T2 - Implications for training in argument and conflict management

AU - Rancer, Andrew S.

AU - Kosberg, Roberta L.

AU - Baukus, Robert A.

PY - 1992/10/1

Y1 - 1992/10/1

N2 - Previous research suggests that altering predispositions toward communication may be an effective prerequisite in training efforts that emphasize communication skill development. Utilizing a theoretical framework that maintains that a predisposition is controlled by a set of beliefs, this study sought to (a) identify beliefs about arguing that could explain variance in argumentativeness, and (b) determine beliefs that discriminate individuals who vary in the trait. Five composite beliefs about arguing (enjoyment, self-concept, pragmatic outcomes, dysfunctional outcomes, and ego-involvement) were found to explain significant variance in underlying motivation to argue and to discriminate between individuals who vary in the predisposition. Implications of the identification and use of these beliefs for communication pedagogy and curriculum design in argumentation and conflict management courses are discussed.

AB - Previous research suggests that altering predispositions toward communication may be an effective prerequisite in training efforts that emphasize communication skill development. Utilizing a theoretical framework that maintains that a predisposition is controlled by a set of beliefs, this study sought to (a) identify beliefs about arguing that could explain variance in argumentativeness, and (b) determine beliefs that discriminate individuals who vary in the trait. Five composite beliefs about arguing (enjoyment, self-concept, pragmatic outcomes, dysfunctional outcomes, and ego-involvement) were found to explain significant variance in underlying motivation to argue and to discriminate between individuals who vary in the predisposition. Implications of the identification and use of these beliefs for communication pedagogy and curriculum design in argumentation and conflict management courses are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21144474930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21144474930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03634529209378899

DO - 10.1080/03634529209378899

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21144474930

VL - 41

SP - 375

EP - 387

JO - Communication Education

JF - Communication Education

SN - 0363-4523

IS - 4

ER -