Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance

An Chih Wang, Chou Yu Tsai, Shelley D. Dionne, Francis J. Yammarino, Seth M. Spain, Hsiao Chi Ling, Min Ping Huang, Li Fang Chou, Bor Shiuan Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a new typology of paternalistic leadership styles based on how leaders demonstrate authoritarianism and benevolence, the two essential components of this type of leadership. Benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership refers to leaders' sole dependence on the use of benevolence without their strong assertion of authority, whereas authoritarianism-dominant paternalistic leadership is based mainly on authoritarianism itself; classical paternalistic leadership, which best fits early observations of paternalistic leaders, refers to the salient combination of both leadership components. We used two distinct samples and methods to test this typology and the association with subordinate performance. Across the two studies, a field investigation with Taiwanese military supervisor-subordinate dyads and a hypothetical scenario experiment with U.S. working adults, we found a positive relationship between classical paternalistic leadership and subordinate performance as strong as that between benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership and performance. Our findings echo the phenomenon that paternalistic leaders tend to combine benevolence with authoritarianism to affect subordinate performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)686-697
Number of pages12
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
Beneficence
authoritarianism
leadership
performance
leader
typology
Benevolence
Testing
dyad
Military
scenario

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Wang, An Chih ; Tsai, Chou Yu ; Dionne, Shelley D. ; Yammarino, Francis J. ; Spain, Seth M. ; Ling, Hsiao Chi ; Huang, Min Ping ; Chou, Li Fang ; Cheng, Bor Shiuan. / Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership : Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. In: Leadership Quarterly. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 686-697.
@article{675621365be241a5ac6ba4912e7da7c8,
title = "Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance",
abstract = "We propose a new typology of paternalistic leadership styles based on how leaders demonstrate authoritarianism and benevolence, the two essential components of this type of leadership. Benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership refers to leaders' sole dependence on the use of benevolence without their strong assertion of authority, whereas authoritarianism-dominant paternalistic leadership is based mainly on authoritarianism itself; classical paternalistic leadership, which best fits early observations of paternalistic leaders, refers to the salient combination of both leadership components. We used two distinct samples and methods to test this typology and the association with subordinate performance. Across the two studies, a field investigation with Taiwanese military supervisor-subordinate dyads and a hypothetical scenario experiment with U.S. working adults, we found a positive relationship between classical paternalistic leadership and subordinate performance as strong as that between benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership and performance. Our findings echo the phenomenon that paternalistic leaders tend to combine benevolence with authoritarianism to affect subordinate performance.",
author = "Wang, {An Chih} and Tsai, {Chou Yu} and Dionne, {Shelley D.} and Yammarino, {Francis J.} and Spain, {Seth M.} and Ling, {Hsiao Chi} and Huang, {Min Ping} and Chou, {Li Fang} and Cheng, {Bor Shiuan}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "686--697",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Wang, AC, Tsai, CY, Dionne, SD, Yammarino, FJ, Spain, SM, Ling, HC, Huang, MP, Chou, LF & Cheng, BS 2018, 'Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance', Leadership Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.002

Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership : Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. / Wang, An Chih; Tsai, Chou Yu; Dionne, Shelley D.; Yammarino, Francis J.; Spain, Seth M.; Ling, Hsiao Chi; Huang, Min Ping; Chou, Li Fang; Cheng, Bor Shiuan.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 6, 12.2018, p. 686-697.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership

T2 - Testing their relationships with subordinate performance

AU - Wang, An Chih

AU - Tsai, Chou Yu

AU - Dionne, Shelley D.

AU - Yammarino, Francis J.

AU - Spain, Seth M.

AU - Ling, Hsiao Chi

AU - Huang, Min Ping

AU - Chou, Li Fang

AU - Cheng, Bor Shiuan

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - We propose a new typology of paternalistic leadership styles based on how leaders demonstrate authoritarianism and benevolence, the two essential components of this type of leadership. Benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership refers to leaders' sole dependence on the use of benevolence without their strong assertion of authority, whereas authoritarianism-dominant paternalistic leadership is based mainly on authoritarianism itself; classical paternalistic leadership, which best fits early observations of paternalistic leaders, refers to the salient combination of both leadership components. We used two distinct samples and methods to test this typology and the association with subordinate performance. Across the two studies, a field investigation with Taiwanese military supervisor-subordinate dyads and a hypothetical scenario experiment with U.S. working adults, we found a positive relationship between classical paternalistic leadership and subordinate performance as strong as that between benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership and performance. Our findings echo the phenomenon that paternalistic leaders tend to combine benevolence with authoritarianism to affect subordinate performance.

AB - We propose a new typology of paternalistic leadership styles based on how leaders demonstrate authoritarianism and benevolence, the two essential components of this type of leadership. Benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership refers to leaders' sole dependence on the use of benevolence without their strong assertion of authority, whereas authoritarianism-dominant paternalistic leadership is based mainly on authoritarianism itself; classical paternalistic leadership, which best fits early observations of paternalistic leaders, refers to the salient combination of both leadership components. We used two distinct samples and methods to test this typology and the association with subordinate performance. Across the two studies, a field investigation with Taiwanese military supervisor-subordinate dyads and a hypothetical scenario experiment with U.S. working adults, we found a positive relationship between classical paternalistic leadership and subordinate performance as strong as that between benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership and performance. Our findings echo the phenomenon that paternalistic leaders tend to combine benevolence with authoritarianism to affect subordinate performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048930472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048930472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048930472

VL - 29

SP - 686

EP - 697

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 6

ER -