Benevolently bowing out: The influence of self-construals and leadership performance on the willful relinquishing of power

Nathaniel J. Ratcliff, Theresa K. Vescio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sometimes a group's best interest is served when powerful people relinquish power, but little theory or empirical research has investigated when and by whom power is willingly given-up. Using a simulated, online team competition, two studies demonstrated that people who were dispositionally high in interdependent self-construals were more likely to relinquish their position of leadership within a group when they perceived that their leadership performance on the task was unambiguously poor versus good. However, when given the ability to attribute performance to others rather than the self, leader's level of interdependent self-construal did not significantly influence their decisions to relinquish power. Overall, these findings suggest that factors such as perceived leadership performance, interdependent self-construals, and ability to defer blame all converge when making decisions in regards to how much power should be relinquished.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)978-983
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013

Fingerprint

leadership
Aptitude
performance
Public Opinion
Empirical Research
Task Performance and Analysis
ability
empirical research
Decision Making
Group
leader
decision making
Power (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{1e2e1ecbac4a46a8b17fafadbe2e1cce,
title = "Benevolently bowing out: The influence of self-construals and leadership performance on the willful relinquishing of power",
abstract = "Sometimes a group's best interest is served when powerful people relinquish power, but little theory or empirical research has investigated when and by whom power is willingly given-up. Using a simulated, online team competition, two studies demonstrated that people who were dispositionally high in interdependent self-construals were more likely to relinquish their position of leadership within a group when they perceived that their leadership performance on the task was unambiguously poor versus good. However, when given the ability to attribute performance to others rather than the self, leader's level of interdependent self-construal did not significantly influence their decisions to relinquish power. Overall, these findings suggest that factors such as perceived leadership performance, interdependent self-construals, and ability to defer blame all converge when making decisions in regards to how much power should be relinquished.",
author = "Ratcliff, {Nathaniel J.} and Vescio, {Theresa K.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "978--983",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benevolently bowing out

T2 - The influence of self-construals and leadership performance on the willful relinquishing of power

AU - Ratcliff, Nathaniel J.

AU - Vescio, Theresa K.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Sometimes a group's best interest is served when powerful people relinquish power, but little theory or empirical research has investigated when and by whom power is willingly given-up. Using a simulated, online team competition, two studies demonstrated that people who were dispositionally high in interdependent self-construals were more likely to relinquish their position of leadership within a group when they perceived that their leadership performance on the task was unambiguously poor versus good. However, when given the ability to attribute performance to others rather than the self, leader's level of interdependent self-construal did not significantly influence their decisions to relinquish power. Overall, these findings suggest that factors such as perceived leadership performance, interdependent self-construals, and ability to defer blame all converge when making decisions in regards to how much power should be relinquished.

AB - Sometimes a group's best interest is served when powerful people relinquish power, but little theory or empirical research has investigated when and by whom power is willingly given-up. Using a simulated, online team competition, two studies demonstrated that people who were dispositionally high in interdependent self-construals were more likely to relinquish their position of leadership within a group when they perceived that their leadership performance on the task was unambiguously poor versus good. However, when given the ability to attribute performance to others rather than the self, leader's level of interdependent self-construal did not significantly influence their decisions to relinquish power. Overall, these findings suggest that factors such as perceived leadership performance, interdependent self-construals, and ability to defer blame all converge when making decisions in regards to how much power should be relinquished.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880634165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880634165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880634165

VL - 49

SP - 978

EP - 983

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 6

ER -