Between the Patient and Politics – A Ready-to-Use Simulation for Human Service Practitioners

Daniel J. Mallinson, Erin O’Hanlon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Caregivers in human services fields operate within a space between their clients and the larger social forces that shape clients’ lives. Empathetic practitioners should learn to identify both personal circumstances and larger systemic forces (e.g., economic inequality) beyond their control that influence patients’ circumstances. Aim. This article presents a novel two-phase simulation that can be beneficial for increasing empathy and policy knowledge among pre-practitioners in a variety of human service fields. Method. We use a mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of a pilot study (n=9) of the simulation. First, pre-, mid-, and post-event surveys are used in conjunction with t-tests to determine changes in overall empathy and knowledge. Second, we use feedback from the first-phase debriefing and end-of-program focus groups to identify emergent themes. Learners role play a state legislator or interest group and must develop legislation to address shortages in physicians and nurses. Result. We found evidence of increased knowledge of the policymaking process and understanding of how politics relates to individual healthcare access challenges. Evidence of gains in empathy were not apparent from the quantitative measures, but were expressed in participant debriefing. Conclusion. The framework presented is flexible enough to adapt and be implemented for a variety of policy problems across a diverse array of human service fields. It shows promise in raising knowledge and potentially empathy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)855-870
Number of pages16
JournalSimulation and Gaming
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Feedback
Economics
Empathy
Human services
Simulation
Debriefing
Role play
Nurses
Caregivers
Physicians
Focus groups
T-test
Policy making
Mixed methods
Shortage
Healthcare
Economic inequality
Interest groups
Legislation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

@article{90e10ab4276348a1a07d498416b391c6,
title = "Between the Patient and Politics – A Ready-to-Use Simulation for Human Service Practitioners",
abstract = "Background. Caregivers in human services fields operate within a space between their clients and the larger social forces that shape clients’ lives. Empathetic practitioners should learn to identify both personal circumstances and larger systemic forces (e.g., economic inequality) beyond their control that influence patients’ circumstances. Aim. This article presents a novel two-phase simulation that can be beneficial for increasing empathy and policy knowledge among pre-practitioners in a variety of human service fields. Method. We use a mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of a pilot study (n=9) of the simulation. First, pre-, mid-, and post-event surveys are used in conjunction with t-tests to determine changes in overall empathy and knowledge. Second, we use feedback from the first-phase debriefing and end-of-program focus groups to identify emergent themes. Learners role play a state legislator or interest group and must develop legislation to address shortages in physicians and nurses. Result. We found evidence of increased knowledge of the policymaking process and understanding of how politics relates to individual healthcare access challenges. Evidence of gains in empathy were not apparent from the quantitative measures, but were expressed in participant debriefing. Conclusion. The framework presented is flexible enough to adapt and be implemented for a variety of policy problems across a diverse array of human service fields. It shows promise in raising knowledge and potentially empathy.",
author = "Mallinson, {Daniel J.} and Erin O’Hanlon",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1046878117734260",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "855--870",
journal = "Simulation and Gaming",
issn = "1046-8781",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Between the Patient and Politics – A Ready-to-Use Simulation for Human Service Practitioners. / Mallinson, Daniel J.; O’Hanlon, Erin.

In: Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 48, No. 6, 01.12.2017, p. 855-870.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between the Patient and Politics – A Ready-to-Use Simulation for Human Service Practitioners

AU - Mallinson, Daniel J.

AU - O’Hanlon, Erin

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Background. Caregivers in human services fields operate within a space between their clients and the larger social forces that shape clients’ lives. Empathetic practitioners should learn to identify both personal circumstances and larger systemic forces (e.g., economic inequality) beyond their control that influence patients’ circumstances. Aim. This article presents a novel two-phase simulation that can be beneficial for increasing empathy and policy knowledge among pre-practitioners in a variety of human service fields. Method. We use a mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of a pilot study (n=9) of the simulation. First, pre-, mid-, and post-event surveys are used in conjunction with t-tests to determine changes in overall empathy and knowledge. Second, we use feedback from the first-phase debriefing and end-of-program focus groups to identify emergent themes. Learners role play a state legislator or interest group and must develop legislation to address shortages in physicians and nurses. Result. We found evidence of increased knowledge of the policymaking process and understanding of how politics relates to individual healthcare access challenges. Evidence of gains in empathy were not apparent from the quantitative measures, but were expressed in participant debriefing. Conclusion. The framework presented is flexible enough to adapt and be implemented for a variety of policy problems across a diverse array of human service fields. It shows promise in raising knowledge and potentially empathy.

AB - Background. Caregivers in human services fields operate within a space between their clients and the larger social forces that shape clients’ lives. Empathetic practitioners should learn to identify both personal circumstances and larger systemic forces (e.g., economic inequality) beyond their control that influence patients’ circumstances. Aim. This article presents a novel two-phase simulation that can be beneficial for increasing empathy and policy knowledge among pre-practitioners in a variety of human service fields. Method. We use a mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of a pilot study (n=9) of the simulation. First, pre-, mid-, and post-event surveys are used in conjunction with t-tests to determine changes in overall empathy and knowledge. Second, we use feedback from the first-phase debriefing and end-of-program focus groups to identify emergent themes. Learners role play a state legislator or interest group and must develop legislation to address shortages in physicians and nurses. Result. We found evidence of increased knowledge of the policymaking process and understanding of how politics relates to individual healthcare access challenges. Evidence of gains in empathy were not apparent from the quantitative measures, but were expressed in participant debriefing. Conclusion. The framework presented is flexible enough to adapt and be implemented for a variety of policy problems across a diverse array of human service fields. It shows promise in raising knowledge and potentially empathy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033481827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033481827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046878117734260

DO - 10.1177/1046878117734260

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 855

EP - 870

JO - Simulation and Gaming

JF - Simulation and Gaming

SN - 1046-8781

IS - 6

ER -