Beware of Allies! Notes on Analytical Hygiene in Actor-Network Account-making

Jan Hendrik Passoth, Nicholas James Rowland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In science and technology studies (STS), reflexivity is not the foremost political or ethical concern that it is for some postmodernists, feminists, anthropologists, or those earnest students of Bourdieu. For us, reflexivity is a practical methodological concern. When reflexivity is raised in our scholarly communications it is, without irony, about crafting scientific communications (i.e., scholarly accounts like articles or books) reflexively. This paper therefore is an actor-network account of making reflexive actor-network accounts, specifically, in the process of writing-up qualitative research findings. It is a paper about research. It is a paper about the research process. As our empirical contribution, we report on research we previously conducted and about the subsequent steps we took toward a (publishable) way of reporting it. We are trying to honestly disclose how the process of preparing a reflexive account is more than merely a matter of cleaning-up the messiness of data, but also, and perhaps foremost, a process of finding, aligning, and occasionally distancing our accounts from our allies - in our case, actor-network theory (ANT) and reflexivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-483
Number of pages19
JournalQualitative Sociology
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

hygiene
reflexivity
allies
communications
technology studies
actor-network-theory
irony
science studies
research process
qualitative research
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{2762fcd0d0e440eb888b20fb88bfc7a7,
title = "Beware of Allies!: Notes on Analytical Hygiene in Actor-Network Account-making",
abstract = "In science and technology studies (STS), reflexivity is not the foremost political or ethical concern that it is for some postmodernists, feminists, anthropologists, or those earnest students of Bourdieu. For us, reflexivity is a practical methodological concern. When reflexivity is raised in our scholarly communications it is, without irony, about crafting scientific communications (i.e., scholarly accounts like articles or books) reflexively. This paper therefore is an actor-network account of making reflexive actor-network accounts, specifically, in the process of writing-up qualitative research findings. It is a paper about research. It is a paper about the research process. As our empirical contribution, we report on research we previously conducted and about the subsequent steps we took toward a (publishable) way of reporting it. We are trying to honestly disclose how the process of preparing a reflexive account is more than merely a matter of cleaning-up the messiness of data, but also, and perhaps foremost, a process of finding, aligning, and occasionally distancing our accounts from our allies - in our case, actor-network theory (ANT) and reflexivity.",
author = "Passoth, {Jan Hendrik} and Rowland, {Nicholas James}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11133-013-9256-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "465--483",
journal = "Qualitative Sociology",
issn = "0162-0436",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Beware of Allies! Notes on Analytical Hygiene in Actor-Network Account-making. / Passoth, Jan Hendrik; Rowland, Nicholas James.

In: Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.12.2013, p. 465-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beware of Allies!

T2 - Notes on Analytical Hygiene in Actor-Network Account-making

AU - Passoth, Jan Hendrik

AU - Rowland, Nicholas James

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - In science and technology studies (STS), reflexivity is not the foremost political or ethical concern that it is for some postmodernists, feminists, anthropologists, or those earnest students of Bourdieu. For us, reflexivity is a practical methodological concern. When reflexivity is raised in our scholarly communications it is, without irony, about crafting scientific communications (i.e., scholarly accounts like articles or books) reflexively. This paper therefore is an actor-network account of making reflexive actor-network accounts, specifically, in the process of writing-up qualitative research findings. It is a paper about research. It is a paper about the research process. As our empirical contribution, we report on research we previously conducted and about the subsequent steps we took toward a (publishable) way of reporting it. We are trying to honestly disclose how the process of preparing a reflexive account is more than merely a matter of cleaning-up the messiness of data, but also, and perhaps foremost, a process of finding, aligning, and occasionally distancing our accounts from our allies - in our case, actor-network theory (ANT) and reflexivity.

AB - In science and technology studies (STS), reflexivity is not the foremost political or ethical concern that it is for some postmodernists, feminists, anthropologists, or those earnest students of Bourdieu. For us, reflexivity is a practical methodological concern. When reflexivity is raised in our scholarly communications it is, without irony, about crafting scientific communications (i.e., scholarly accounts like articles or books) reflexively. This paper therefore is an actor-network account of making reflexive actor-network accounts, specifically, in the process of writing-up qualitative research findings. It is a paper about research. It is a paper about the research process. As our empirical contribution, we report on research we previously conducted and about the subsequent steps we took toward a (publishable) way of reporting it. We are trying to honestly disclose how the process of preparing a reflexive account is more than merely a matter of cleaning-up the messiness of data, but also, and perhaps foremost, a process of finding, aligning, and occasionally distancing our accounts from our allies - in our case, actor-network theory (ANT) and reflexivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888045311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888045311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11133-013-9256-6

DO - 10.1007/s11133-013-9256-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84888045311

VL - 36

SP - 465

EP - 483

JO - Qualitative Sociology

JF - Qualitative Sociology

SN - 0162-0436

IS - 4

ER -